Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the digital mammographic imaging screening trial

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Cole, Elodia B ^a   Zhang, Zheng ^b   Marques, Helga S ^b   Nishikawa, Robert M ^c   Hendrick, R Edward ^d   Yaffe, Martin J ^e   Padungchaichote, Wittaya ^f   Kuzmiak, Cherie ^g   Chayakulkheeree, Jatuporn ^h   Conant, Emily F ⁱ   Fajardo, Laurie L ^j   Baum, Janet ^k   Gatsonis, Constantine ^b   Pisano, Etta ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f Lopburi Cancer Center   (Thailand)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^k NONE

more..

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided detection; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 84865599019     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7255     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783
2. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR 2002; 179:671-677
3. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001; 218:873-880
4. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, et al. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - observer performance study. Radiology 2005; 237:37-44
5. Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. AJR 2007; 188:377-384
6. Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II study. Radiology 2004; 232:197-204
7. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study. Radiology 2003; 229:877-884
8. Pisano ED, Gatsonis CA, Yaffe MJ, et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology 2005; 236:404-412
9. Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008; 246:376-383
10. Heddson B, Ronnow K, Olsson M, Miller D. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64:419-425
11. Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, et al. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. AJR 2007; 189:860-866
12. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol 2008; 18:183-191
13. Skaane P. Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 2009; 50:3-14
14. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Website. Performance measures for 3,884,059 screening mammography examinations from 1996 to 2997 by age. breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/performance/ screening/perf-age.html. Accessed August 17, 2010
15. Balleyguier C, Kinkel K, Fermanian J, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist? Eur J Radiol 2005; 54:90-96
16. Hukkinen K, Vehmas T, Pamilo M, Kivisaari L. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 257-263
17. Paquerault S, Samuelson FW, Petrick N, Myers KJ, Smith RC. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software. Acad Radiol 2009; 16:1095-1107
18. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253: 353-358
19. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, et al. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 1994; 21:265-269
20. Bolivar AV, Gomez SS, Merino P, et al. Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Acta Radiol 2010; 51:1086-1092
21. The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. AJR 2009; 192:337-340
22. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 2007; 244:104-111