Assessing target acquisition and tracking performance for complex moving targets in the presence of latency and jitter

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 109-116

  Pavlovych, Andriy ^a   Gutwin, Carl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acquisition; H.5.2. information interfaces and presentation : user interfaces theory and methods; evaluation methodology; Jitter; Latency; Moving targets; Tracking

Indexed keywords

ACQUISITION; CRITICAL THRESHOLD; DELAY COMPENSATION; GAME SYSTEM; HIGH VELOCITY; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; LATENCY; MOVING TARGETS; NETWORKED GAMES; QUALITY OF INTERACTION; REAL-TIME GAMES; REAL-TIME GROUPWARE; REMOTE PARTICIPATION; TARGET ACQUISITION; TARGET VELOCITY; THEORY AND METHODS; TRACKING ERRORS; TRACKING PERFORMANCE;

GROUPWARE; JITTER; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; SURFACE DISCHARGES; USER INTERFACES;

TARGET TRACKING;

EID: 84865598802     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Allison, R. S., Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., Jasiobedzka, U., and Zacher, J. E. 2001. Tolerance of Temporal Delay in Virtual Environments. IEEE VR 2001, 247-254.
2. Armitage, G. and Stewart, L. 2004. Limitations of using real-world, public servers to estimate jitter tolerance of first person shooter games. ACMACE '04, 257-262.
3. Bolia, R. S., Morley, R. M., Nelson, T. W., Roe, M. M. 2000. Assessing Simulator Sickness in a See-Through HMD: Effects of Time Delay, Time on Task, and Task Complexity. Proceedings of the 2000 IMAGE Conference, available Online at: http://www.spatiald.wpafb.af.mil/Publications/IMAGE00.pdf
4. Console Gaming: The Lag Factor. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/ digitalfoundry-lag-factor-article.
5. Craig, S. J., Reid, L., and Kruk, R. 2000. The effect of visual system time delay on helicopter control. Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 3-69-3-72.
6. Ellis, S. R., Breant, F., Manges, B., Jacoby, R., and Adelstein, B. D. 1997. Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency. Virtual Reality 1997, 138-145.
7. Ellis, S. R., Young, M. J., Adelstein, B. D., and Ehrlich, S. M. 1999. Discrimination of changes of latency during voluntary hand movements of virtual objects. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1999, 1182-1186.
8. Fekete, J.-D., Elmqvist, N., and Guiard, Y. 2009. Motion-pointing: target selection using elliptical motions. Proc. CHI '09. 289-298.
9. Foxlin, E., Motion tracking requirements and technologies. In Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation and applications, Lawrence Eribaum, 2002, 163-210.
10. Hasan, K., Grossman, T., and Irani, P. 2011. Comet and Target Ghost: Techniques for Selecting Moving Targets. CHI '11, 839-848.
11. Hoffmann, E. R. 1991. Capture of moving targets: a modification of Fitts' Law', Ergonomics, 34:2, 211-220.
12. ISO/DIS 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 2000.
13. Just ping - Online web-based ping: remote ping a server with 40 checkpoints worldwide, www.just-ping.com.
14. Kulikov, S., MacKenzie, I. S., and Stuerzlinger, W. 2005. Measuring the effective parameters of steering motions. CHI '05 extended abstracts, 1569-1572.
15. Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C., and Viviani, P. 1983. The law relating kinematic and figurai aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130.
16. MacKenzie, I. S., and Ware, C. 1993. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. ACM CHI 1993, 488-493.
17. Meehan, M., Razzaque, S., Whitton, M. C., and Brooks, F. P. 2003. Effect of Latency on Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. In IEEE VR 2003, 141-138.
18. Mine, M. R., Characterization of End-to-End Delays in Head-Mounted Display Systems. Univ. North Carolina Chapel Hill, 1993.
19. Mould, D. and Gutwin, C. The effects of feedback on targeting with multiple moving targets. Graphics Interface 2004, 25-32.
20. Pantel, L and Wolf, L. C. 2002. On the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. In Proc. NOSSDAV '02, 23-29.
21. Pavlovych, A. and Stuerzlinger, W. 2009. The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. Proc. EICS '09, 187-196.
22. Pavlovych, A. and Stuerzlinger, W. 2011. Target Following Performance in the Presence of Latency, Jitter, and Signal Dropouts, Graphics Interface 2011, 33-40.
23. Port, N. L., Kruse, W., Lee, D., and Georgopoulos, A. P. 2001. Motor Cortical Activity during Interception of Moving Targets. J. Cognitive Neuroscience 13, 3, 306-318.
24. Poulton, E. C. 1952. Perceptual anticipation in tracking with two-pointer and one-pointer displays. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 222-229.
25. Poulton, E. C. Tracking Skill and Manual Control. Academic Press (1974).
26. Savery, C. and Graham, N. 2011. It's about time: confronting latency in the development of groupware systems. CSCW 2011, 177-186.
27. So, R. H. Y., and Chung, G. K. M. 2005. Sensory Motor Responses in Virtual Environments: Studying the Effects of Image Latencies for Target-directed Hand Movement. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE-EMBS 2005, 5006-5008.
28. Teather, R., Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W., and MacKenzie, S. 2009. Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement, IEEE 3DUI 2009, 43-50.
29. Tumanov, O., Allison, R., and Stuerzlinger, W. 2007. Variability-Aware Latency Amelioration in Distributed Environments, IEEE VR 2007, 123-130.
30. Ware C., and Balakrishnan, R., Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate. ACM TOCHI 1, 4, 1994, 331-356.