Effects of tracking technology, latency, and spatial jitter on object movement

3DUI - IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 2009 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 43-50

  Teather, Robert J ^a   Pavlovych, Andriy ^a   Stuerzlinger, Wolfgang ^a   MacKenzie, I Scott ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D manipulation; Fitts' Law; Jitter; Latency

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS; USER INTERFACES;

3D MANIPULATION; FITTS' LAW; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; LATENCY; OBJECT MOVEMENTS; PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS; POINTING DEVICES; TRACKING TECHNOLOGY;

JITTER;

EID: 70349320507     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/3DUI.2009.4811204     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Data Sheet - ADNS-3080, High performance optical mouse sensor, Avago Technologies, 2008. Accessed January 4, 2009. http://www.avagotech.com/docs/ AV02-0366EN.
2. E. Bier. Skitters and jacks: interactive 3D positioning tools, in Proceedings of the 1986 workshop on Interactive 3D graphics Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States: ACM, pp. 183-196, 1987.
3. D. A. Bowman, D. B. Johnson, and L. F. Hodges. Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques, in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology London, United Kingdom: ACM, pp. 26-33, 1999.
4. D. A. Bowman, E. Kruijff, J. LaViola, Jr., and I. Poupyrev. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice: Addison Wesley, 2004.
5. F. P. Brooks, Jr., M. Ouh-Young, J. J. Batter, and P. J. Kilpatrick. Project GROPE: Haptic displays for scientific visualization, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol.24, pp. 177-185, 1990.
6. B. D. Conner, S. Snibbe, K. Herndon, D. Robbins, R. Zeleznik, and A. van Dam. Three-dimensional widgets, in Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States: ACM, pp. 183-188, 1992.
7. S. R. Ellis, F. Breant, B. Manges, R. Jacoby, and B. D. Adelstein. Factors influencing operator interaction with virtual objects viewed via head-mounted see-through displays: viewing conditions and rendering latency, in Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1997. IEEE, pp. 138-145, 1997.
8. S. R. Ellis, M. J. Young, B. D. Adelstein, and S. M. Ehrlich. Discrimination of changes of latency during voluntary hand movements of virtual objects, in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Houston, Texas, pp. 1182-1186, 1999.
9. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.47, pp. 381-391, 1954.
10. E. Foxlin. Motion tracking requirements and technologies, in Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation and applications, K. M. Stanney, Ed. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 163-210, 2002.
11. ISO/DIS 9241-9249 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, 2000.
12. I. S. MacKenzie. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in humancomputer interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, vol.7, pp. 91-139, 1992.
13. I. S. MacKenzie and C. Ware. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems, in Proceedings of the CHI '93 conference on Human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ACM, pp. 488-493, 1993.
14. M. R. Mine. Characterization of End-to-End Delays in Head- Mounted Display Systems, Technical report, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1993.
15. NaturalPoint OptiTrack, NaturalPoint, Inc., 2008. Accessed January 4, 2009. http://www.naturalpoint.com/optitrack/.
16. J.-Y. Oh and W. Stuerzlinger. Moving objects with 2D input devices in CAD systems and Desktop Virtual Environments, in Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2005, Victoria, British Columbia: Canadian Human- Computer Communications Society, pp. 195-202, 2005.
17. I. Poupyrev, Ichikawa T., S. Weghorst, and M. Billinghurst. Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: Empirical evaluation of interaction techniques, in Proceedings of Eurographics '98, vol.17, pp. 41-52, 1998.
18. R. H. Y. So and G. K. M. Chung. Sensory motor responses in virtual environments: Studying the effects of image latencies for target-directed hand movement, in 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5006-5008, 2005.
19. R. W. Soukoreff and I. S. MacKenzie. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation: Perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.61, pp. 751-789, 2004.
20. R. J. Teather and W. Stuerzlinger. Assessing the effects of orientation and device on (constrained) 3D movement techniques, in IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pp. 43-50, 2008.
21. C. Ware and R. Balakrishnan. Reaching for objects in VR displays: lag and frame rate, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol.1, no.4, pp. 331-356, 1994.
22. C. Ware and D. R. Jessome. Using the bat: A six-dimensional mouse for object placement," in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 8, pp. 65-70, 1988.
23. S. Zhai, W. Buxton, and P. Milgram. The "silk cursor": Investigating transparency for 3D target acquisition," in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 459-464, 1994.