Robotics in endoscopy

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 477-482

  Klibansky, David ^a   Rothstein, Richard I ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

endoscopy; platforms; robotics; surgery; therapeutic

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; TELEMETRY;

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; HUMANS; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84865516850     PISSN: 02671379     EISSN: 15317056     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328356ac5e     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Rothstein R, Rosen J, Young J. Improving efficiency in endoscopy with robotic technology. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 2004; 14:679-696. (Pubitemid 39195308)
2. Eickhoff A, Van Dam J, Jakobs R, et al. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the Neoguide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:261-266. (Pubitemid 46160537)
3. Vucelik B, Rex D, Pulanic R, et al. The aer-o-scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope. Gastroenterology 2006; 130:672-677. (Pubitemid 43374517)
4. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature 2000; 405:417.
5. Abbott DJ, Becke C, Rothstein R, et al. Design of an Endoluminal NOTES robotic system. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2007, October-November.
6. Sun Z, Ang RY, Lim EW, et al. Enhancement of a master-slave robotic system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Ann Acad Med 2011; 40:223-230.
7. Unger SW, Unger HM, Bass RT. AESOP robotic arm. Surg Endosc 1994; 9:1131.
8. Taniguchi K, Nishikawa A, Sekimoto M, et al. Classification, design and evaluation of endoscope robots. Robot Surg 2010; 1-24.
9. Bloom M, Salzberg AD, Krummel TM, et al. Advanced technology in surgery. Curr Probl Surg 2002; 39:733-832.
10. Wang X, Meng MQ, Chen X. A locomotion mechanism with external magnetic guidance for active capsule endoscope. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010:4375-4378.
11. Swain P, Toor A, Volke F, et al. Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:1290-1293.
12. Luketich JD, Fernando HC, Buenaventuro PO, et al. Results of a randomized trial of HERMES-assisted versus non-HERMES-assisted laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16:1264-1266. (Pubitemid 34988729)
13. Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ, et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70:121-125.
14. Von Renteln D, Vassiliou MC, Rosch T, Rothstein RI. Triangulation: the holy grail of endoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 2011; 25:1355-1357.
15. Eisenberg D, Storne E, Belson A, et al. Use of a flexible robotic transgastric natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) platform in a cadaver to test access, navigation, maneuverability, and stability. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:2323.
16. Swanstrom LL. NOTES: platform development for a paradigm shift in flexible endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011; 140:1150-1154.
17. Spaun GO, Zheng B, Swanstrom LL. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a bench-top comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:2720-2727.
18. Shaikh SN, Thompson CC. Natural orifice translumenal surgery: flexible platform review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2:210-216.
19. Park PO, Long GL, Bergstrom M, et al. A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intraabdominal vessel sealing in porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:835-841.
20. Von Renteln D, Pohl H, Vassiliou MC, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection by using a flexible Maryland dissector: a randomized, controlled, porcine study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:1056-1062.
21. Von Renteln D, Dulai PS, Pohl H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with a flexible Maryland dissector: randomized comparison of mesna and saline solution for submucosal injection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:906-911.
22. Swain CP, Bally K, Park PO, et al. New methods for innovation: the development of a toolbox for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. Surg Endosc 2012; 26:1010-1020.
23. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Lehman AC, et al. In vivo miniature robots for natural orifice surgery: state of the art and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2:217-223.
24. Lehman AC, Dumpert J, Wood NA, et al. Natural orifice cholecystectomy using a miniature robot. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:260-266.
25. Smith K, Goldstein SC. Programmable matter: applications for gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgery. Gastroenterology 2011; 140:1884-1886.