A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intra-abdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 835-841

  Park, Per Ola ^a   Long, Gary L ^a   Bergström, Maria ^a   Cunningham, Christie ^a   Vakharia, Omar J ^a   Bakos, Gregory J ^a   Bally, Kurt R ^a   Rothstein, Richard I ^a   Swain, C Paul ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHENYLEPHRINE;

ABDOMINAL WALL; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD CLOTTING; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSEL; CECUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRODE; EUROPE; FLEXIBLE BIPOLAR FORCEP; GASTROSCOPE; HEMOSTASIS; LAPAROSCOPIC BIPOLAR FORCEP; MESENTERIC ARTERY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD; SWINE; UNITED STATES; UTERINE ARTERY; UTERUS HORN;

ANIMALS; CECUM; ELECTROCOAGULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; GASTROSCOPES; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; LAPAROSCOPES; MESENTERIC ARTERIES; MESENTERIC ARTERY, INFERIOR; OVARY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SWINE; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; UTERINE ARTERY; VEINS;

EID: 77950260619     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Swain P. What endoscopic accessories do we really need?. Gastrointest Clin North Am 7 (1997) 313-330
2. Richter S., Kollmar O., Schilling M.K., et al. Efficacy and quality of vessel sealing: comparison of a reusable with a disposable device and effects of clamp surface geometry and structure. Surg Endosc 20 (2006) 890-894
3. Richter S., Kollmar O., Neunhoeffer E., et al. Differential response of arteries and veins to bipolar vessel sealing: evaluation of a novel reusable device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16 (2006) 149-155
4. Kennedy J.S., Stranahan P.L., Taylor K.D., et al. High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc 12 (1998) 876-878
5. Hübner M., Hahnloser D., Hetzer F., et al. A prospective randomized comparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21 (2007) 592-594
6. Carbonell A.M., Joels C.S., Kercher K.W., et al. A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13 (2003) 377-380
7. Targarona E.M., Balague C., Marin J., et al. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis. Surg Innov 12 (2005) 339-344
8. Harold K.L., Pollinger H., Matthews B.D., et al. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 17 (2003) 1228-1230
9. Hruby G.W., Marruffo F.C., Durak E., et al. Evaluation of surgical energy devices for vessel sealing and peripheral energy spread in a porcine model. J Urol 178 (2007) 2689-2693
10. Sung J.J., Tsoi K.K., Lai L.H., et al. Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gut 56 (2007) 1364-1373
11. Hepworth C.C., Kadirkamanathan S.S., Gong F., et al. A randomised controlled comparison of injection, thermal, and mechanical endoscopic methods of haemostasis on mesenteric vessels. Gut 42 (1998) 462-469
12. Laine L. Endoscopic therapy for bleeding ulcers: room for improvement?. Gastrointest Endosc 57 (2003) 557-560
13. Jensen D.M., Machicado G.A., and Hirabayashi K. Randomized controlled study of 3 different types of hemoclips for hemostasis of bleeding canine acute gastric ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006) 768-773
14. Swain C.P., Mills T.N., Shemesh E., et al. Which electrode? A comparison of four endoscopic methods of electrocoagulation in experimental bleeding ulcers. Gut 25 (1984) 1424-1431
15. Johnston J.H., Jensen D.M., and Auth D. Experimental comparison of endoscopic yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser, electrosurgery, and heater probe for canine gut arterial coagulation. Importance of compression and avoidance of erosion. Gastroenterology 92 (1987) 1101-1108
16. Wallwiener C.W., Rajab T.K., Zubke W., et al. Thermal conduction, compression, and electrical current-an evaluation of major parameters of electrosurgical vessel sealing in a porcine in vitro model. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15 (2008) 605-610
17. Chang I. Finite element analysis of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using temperature-dependent electrical conductivity. Biomed Eng Online 2 (2003) 12
18. Sigel B., and Hatke F.L. Physical factors in electrocoaptation of blood vessels. Arch Surg 95 (1967) 54-58
19. Swain C.P., Storey D.W., Bown, et al. Nature of the bleeding vessel in recurrently bleeding gastric ulcers. Gastroenterology 90 (1986) 595-608
20. Takizawa K., Oda I., Gotoda T., et al. Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection-an analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy 40 (2008) 179-183