The case for an open science in technology enhanced learning

International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 643-654

  Kraker, Peter ^a   Leony, Derick ^b   Reinhardt, Wolfgang ^c   Beham, Günter ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADERBORN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Barriers to open science; Comparability of research; Implementation of open science; Open access; Open data; Open methodology; Open science; Open source; Reproducible research; Technology enhanced learning; TEL; Vision paper

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865512384     PISSN: 17535255     EISSN: 17535263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTEL.2011.045454     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Björk, B-C. (2004) 'Open access to scientific publications - an analysis of the barriers to change?', Information Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, available at http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper170.html (accessed on 14 December 2011).
2. BOAI (2002) Budapest Open Access Initiative, available at http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml (accessed on 29 April 2011).
3. Bowman, A. W. et al. (2010) 'Interactive teaching tools for spatial sampling', Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 36, No. 13, pp. 1-17.
4. Brase, J. (2009) 'DataCite - a global registration agency for research data', in Fourth International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, IEEE, pp. 257-261.
5. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
6. Dalton, R. (2002) 'Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth', Nature, Vol. 420, No. 6917, pp. 728-729. (Pubitemid 36019588)
7. David, P. A. (2004) 'Can "open science" be protected from the evolving regime of IPR protections?', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, Vol. 160, No. 1, pp. 9-34. (Pubitemid 38614563)
8. del Cid, J. P. E. et al. (2007) 'Implementation of a learning design run-time environment for the. LRN learning management', Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Special Issue: Adaptation and IMS Learning Design, Special Issue: Adaption and IMS Learning Design, available at http://jime.open. ac.uk/jime/article/viewArticle/2007-7/323 (accessed on 4 January 2012).
9. Dougiamas, M. and Taylor, P. (2003) 'Moodle: using learning communities to create an open source course management system', in D. Lassner and C. McNaught (Eds.): Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003, AACE, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 171-178.
10. Drachsler, H. et al. (2010) 'Issues and considerations regarding sharable data sets for recommender systems in technology enhanced learning', Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 2849-2858.
11. Dror, I. E. (2008) 'Technology enhanced learning: the good, the bad, and the ugly', Pragmatics & Cognition, Vol. 2, No. 16, pp. 215-223.
12. Dubois, P. F., Epperly, T. and Kumfert, G. (2003) 'Why Johnny can't build [portable scientific software]', Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 5, p. 83-88.
13. Eysenbach, G. (2006) 'Citation advantage of open access articles', PLoS Biology, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 692-697.
14. Feller, J. and Fitzgerald, B. (2002) Understanding Open Source Software Development, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
15. Fomel, S. and Hennenfent, G. (2007) 'Reproducible computational experiments using SCons', in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Computer Society, pp. IV-1257-IV-1260. (Pubitemid 47178605)
16. Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. (2004) 'Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes', in R&D Management Conference.
17. Geser, G. (2007) Open Educational Practices and Resources: The OlcOs Roadmap 2012, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
18. Gezelter, D. (2009) 'What, exactly, is open science? The open science project', available at http://www.openscience.org/blog/?p=269 (accessed on 27 April 2011).
19. Gillet, D., Scott, P. and Sutherland, R. (2009) 'STELLAR European research network of excellence in technology enhanced learning', in International Conference on Engineering Education & Research.
20. Goble, C. and De Roure, D. C. (2007) 'myExperiment: social networking for workflow-using e-scientists', in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, ACM, pp. 1-2. (Pubitemid 47291445)
21. Henry, N., Goodell, H., Elmqvist, N. and Fekete, J-D. (2007) '20 years of four HCI conferences: a visual exploration', Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 23, No. 3. pp. 239-285.
22. Kirby, J., Hoadley, C. and Carr-Chellman, A. (2005) 'Instructional systems design and the learning sciences: a citation analysis', Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 37-48. (Pubitemid 40447884)
23. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
24. Larsen, P. O. and von Ins, M. (2010) 'The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index', Scientometrics, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 575-603.
25. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
26. Marshall, E. (2001) 'Bermuda rules: community spirit, with teeth', Science, Vol. 291, No. 5507, pp. 1192-1192.
27. Maurer, H. and Khan, M. S. (2010) 'Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008: a scientometric and content analysis for selected journals and conferences using visualization', Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5-18.
28. Murray-Rust, P. (2008) 'Open data in science', Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 52-64.
29. Narayanan, A. and Shmatikov, V. (2008) 'Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets in security and privacy', SP 2008. IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, pp. 111-125.
30. National Science Board (2010) Science and Engineering Labor Force, National Science Foundation, Arlington.
31. Nielsen, M. (2008) 'The future of science', Michael Nielsen Blog, available at http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/ (accessed on 27 April 2011).
32. Osentoski, S. et al. (2010) 'Brown ROS package: reproducibility for shared experimentation and learning from demonstration', in AAAI-10 Robot Workshop.
33. Polanyi, M. (1983) The Tacit Dimension, Peter Smith Gloucester, MA.
34. Price, D. J. D. S. (1963) Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press, New York.
35. Reinhardt, W., Meier, C., Drachsler, H. and Sloep, P. (2011) 'Analyzing 5 years of EC-TEL proceedings', in C. D. Kloos, D. Gillet, R. M. C. Garcìa, F. Wild and M. Wolpers (Eds.): Towards Ubiquitous Learning. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pp 531-536, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
36. Schwab, M., Karrenbach, N. and Claerbout, J. (2000) 'Making scientific computations reproducible', Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 61-67.
37. Stamper, J. et al. (2010) 'PSLC DataShop: a data analysis service for the learning science community', in V. Aleven, J. Kay and J. Mostow (Eds.): Intelligent Tutoring Systems, p. 455, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
38. Stodden, V. (2009) 'The legal framework for reproducible scientific research: licensing and copyright', Computing in Science & Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 35-40.
39. Stodden, V. (2010) 'The scientific method in practice: reproducibility in the computational sciences', Sloan School Working Paper, 4773-10, MIT, available at http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=1550193 (accessed on 10 April 2011).
40. Verbert, K. et al. (2011) 'Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning', in 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Banff, Canada.
41. Waldrop, M. (2008) 'Science 2.0', Scientific American, Vol. 298, No. 5, pp. 46-51.
42. Young, N. S., Ioannidis, J. P. and Al-Ubaydli, O. (2008) 'Why current publication practices may distort science', PLoS medicine, Vol. 5, No. 10, p. e201.
43. Zhou, B., Pei, J. and Luk, W. (2008) 'A brief survey on anonymization techniques for privacy preserving publishing of social network data', ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, Vol. 10, No. 2.