Justifying Party Identification: A Case of Identifying with the "Lesser of Two Evils"

Political Behavior

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 453-475

  Groenendyk, Eric ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Identity defense; Lesser of two evils; Motivated reasoning; Partisan dimensionality; Partisanship; Party identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865406646     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-011-9170-0     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(4), 343-352.
2. Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W. J., Newcomb, T. M., Rosenberg, M. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (Eds.). (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3. Achen, C. H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior, 14(3), 195-211.
4. Achen, C. H. (2002). Parental socialization and rational party identification. Political Behavior, 24(2), 151-170.
5. Alvarez, M. R. (1990). The puzzle of party identification: Dimensionality of an important concept. American Politics Quarterly, 18(4), 476-491.
6. Brody, R. A., & Rothenberg, L. S. (1988). The instability of partisanship: An analysis of the 1980 presidential election. British Journal of Political Science, 18(4), 445-465.
7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
8. Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row.
9. Carsey, T. M., & Layman, G. C. (2006). Changing sides or changing minds? Party identification and policy preferences in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 464-477.
10. Cooper, J., & Mackie, D. (1983). Cognitive dissonance in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(3), 536-544.
11. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Plenum.
12. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
13. Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31-44.
14. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row.
15. Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Fiorina, M. P. (2002). Parties and partisanship: A 40-year retrospective. Political Behavior, 24(2), 93-115.
17. Franklin, C. H. (1984). Issue preferences, socialization, and the evolution of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 459-478.
18. Franklin, C. H. (1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 14(3), 297-309.
19. Franklin, C. H., & Jackson, J. E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77(4), 957-973.
20. Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 794-818.
21. Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1999). Misperceptions about perceptual bias. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 189-210.
22. Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 627-641.
23. Goren, P. (2007). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation: Modification and extensions. Political Behavior, 29(3), 305-325.
24. Green, D. P. (1988). On the dimensionality of public sentiment toward partisan and ideological groups. American Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 758-780.
25. Green, D. P., & Palmquist, B. (1990). Of artifacts and partisan instability. American Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 872-902.
26. Green, D. P., & Palmquist, B. (1994). How stable is party identification? Political Behavior, 16(4), 437-466.
27. Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Jackson, J. E. (1975). Issues, party choices, and presidential votes. American Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 161-185.
29. Kamieniecki, S. (1988). The dimensionality of partisan strength and political independence. Political Behavior, 10(4), 364-376.
30. Katz, R. S. (1979). The dimensionality of party identification: Cross-national perspectives. Comparative Politics, 11(2), 147-163.
31. Key, V. O. (1966). The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting 1936-1960. New York: Vintage Books.
32. Kroh, M., & Selb, P. (2009). Inheritance and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 31(4), 559-574.
33. Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498.
35. Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., & Spencer, S. J. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 283-299.
36. Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 565-579.
37. Kunda, Z., & Sanitioso, R. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(3), 272-285.
38. Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgments? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 522-544.
39. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Marcus, G. (2000). Emotions in politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 221-250.
41. Marcus, G., MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., & Keele, L. (2006). The measure and mismeasure of emotions. In D. P. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
42. Markus, G. E., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1055-1070.
43. Mayhew, D. R. (2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.
44. Page, B. I., & Jones, C. C. (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1071-1089.
45. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 1021-1044.
46. Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). Motivated reasoning, affect, and the role of memory in voter decision making. In D. P. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever "get it"? Political Psychology, 31(4), 563-593.
48. Shively, W. P. (1979). The development of party identification among adults: Exploration of a functional model. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1039-1054.
49. Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Wolfe, C. T., Fong, C., & Dunn, M. A. (1998). Automatic activation of stereotypes: The role of self-image threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(11), 1139-1152.
50. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
51. Taber, C., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137-155.
52. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
53. Valentine, D. C., & van Wingen, J. R. (1980). Partisanship, independence, and the partisan identification question. American Politics Quarterly, 8(2), 1965-1986.
54. Weinschenk, A. C. (2010). Revisiting the political theory of party identification. Political Behavior, 32(4), 473-494.
55. Weisberg, H. F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2(1), 33-60.
56. Weisberg, H. F., & Christenson, D. P. (2007). Changing horses in wartime? The 2004 Presidential Election. Political Behavior, 29(2), 279-304.
57. Weisberg, H. F., & Christenson, D. P. (2010). Partisan defection and change in the 2008 US presidential election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20(2), 213-240.
58. Westen, D., Blagov, P. S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U. S. presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1947-1958.