Changing horses in wartime? the 2004 presidential election

Political Behavior

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 279-304

  Weisberg, Herbert F ^a   Christenson, Dino P ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

2004 election; Foreign policy; Presidential election; Voting; War

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248592467     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-007-9026-9     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aldrich, J. H., Sullivan, J. L., & Borgida, E. (1989). Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates 'waltz before a blind audience? American Political Science Review, 83, 123-131.
2. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
3. Erskine, H. (1963). The polls: Exposure to international information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 658-662.
4. Fordham, B. (1998). Partisanship, macroeconomic policy, and U.S. uses of force, 1949-1994. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42, 418-439.
5. Funk, C. L. (1996). Understanding trait inferences in candidate images. Research in Micropolitics, 5, 97-123.
6. Funk, C. L. (1999). Bringing the candidate into models of candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 61, 700-720.
7. Green, D. P. (1988). On the dimensionality of public sentiment toward partisan and ideological groups. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 758-780.
8. Hess, S., & Nelson, M. (1985). Foreign policy: Dominance and decisiveness in presidential elections. In: M. Nelson (Ed.), The Elections of 1984 (pp. 129-154). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
9. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1990). Public images of the Soviet Union: The impact on foreign policy attitudes. Journal of Politics, 52, 3-28.
10. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987a). The means and ends of foreign policy as determinants of presidential support. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 236-258.
11. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987b). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Journal of Political Science, 81, 1099-1120.
12. Hurwitz, J., Peffley, M., & Raymond, P. (1989). Presidential support during the Iran-Contra affair: An individual level analysis of presidential reappraisal. American Politics Quarterly, 17, 359-385.
13. Hurwitz, J., Peffley, M., & Seligson, M. A. (1993). Foreign policy belief systems in comparative perspective: The United States and Costa Rica. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 245-270.
14. Karol, D., & Miguel, E. (2005). Iraq war casualties and the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley.
15. Kelley, S. (1983). Interpreting elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 72, 506-522.
17. Kessel, J. H. (2004). Views of the voters. In H. F. Weisberg & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Models of voting in Presidential Elections (pp. 65-84). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Kessel, J. H. (2005). Structures of vote choice: The larger context of the 2004 election. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.
19. Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84, 497-512.
21. Maggioto, M. A., & Wittkopf, E. R. (1981). American public attitudes toward foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, 25, 601-631.
22. Miller, A. H., Miller, W. E., Raine, A. S., & Brown, T. A. (1976). A majority party in disarray: Policy polarization in the 1972 election. American Political Science Review, 70, 753-778.
23. Mueller, J. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 64, 18-34.
24. Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, Presidents, and public opinion. New York: Wiley.
25. Nincic, M., & Hinckley, B. (1991). Foreign policy and the evaluation of presidential candidates. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 333-355.
26. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1982). Changes in Americans' policy preferences, 1935-1979. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 24-42.
27. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77, 175-190.
28. Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (1985). A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 871-890.
29. Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (1993). Models of attitude constraint in foreign affairs. Political Behavior, 15, 61-90.
30. Pomper, G. M. (1975). Voters' choice: Varieties of American electoral behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.
31. Shapiro, R. Y., & Page, B. I. (1988). Foreign policy and the rational public. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 211-247.
32. Stokes, D. E. (1966). Some dynamic elements of contests for the presidency. The American Political Science Review, 60, 19-28.
33. Stoll, R. J. (1984). The guns of November: Presidential reelections and the use of force, 1947-1982. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 28, 231-246.
34. Weisberg, H. F. (2005). The US Presidential and Congressional Elections, November 2004. Electoral Studies, 24, 777-784.
35. Weisberg, H. F., & Hill, T. G. (2004). The succession presidential election of 2000: The battle of the legacies. In H. F. Weisberg, & C. Wilcox (Eds.), Models of voting in Presidential Elections (pp. 27-48). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
36. Weisberg, H. F., & Mockabee, S. T. (1999). Attitudinal correlates of the 1996 presidential vote: The people reeled a president. In H. F. Weisberg & J. M. Box-Steffensmeier (Eds.), Reelection 1996: How Americans voted (pp. 45-69). Chappaqua, NY: Chatham House.