Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals

Medical Teacher

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 698-704

  Azer, Samy A ^a   Ramani, Subha ^b   Peterson, Ray ^c  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; WRITING;

AUSTRALIA; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MANUSCRIPTS AS TOPIC; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

EID: 84865382528     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687488     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, Gaggar A, Kapoor N, LaFrance M, Mans R, Mayhew D, McGowan S, Polter A, et al. 2007. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ 31:145-152.
2. Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. 2003. How to review a paper. Adv Physiol Educ 27:47-52.
3. Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. 1998. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal. JAMA 280:231-233. (Pubitemid 28493891)
4. Bland C, Addeane Caelleigh A, Steinecke A. 2001. Reviewers etiquette. Acad Med 76:954-955.
5. Bordage G. 2001. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Acad Med 76:889-896. (Pubitemid 32881012)
6. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. 2003. The effectiveness of journal peer review. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. 2 ed. London: BMJ Books. pp 62-75.
7. Garmel GM. 2010. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals. Perm J 14(1):32-40.
8. Godlee F. 2002. Making reviewers visible: Openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA 287:2762-2765. (Pubitemid 34591957)
9. Guilford WH. 2001. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv Physiol Educ 25:167-175.
10. ICMJE. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2010. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Ethical consideration in the conduct and reporting research in the conduct and reporting research: Conflict of interest. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/ethical- 4conlicts.html
11. Isohanni M. 2005. Peer review-still the well-functioning quality control and enhancer in scientific research. Acta Psychiatr Scand 112:165-166. (Pubitemid 41176550)
12. McNutt RA, Evans AT, Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. 1990. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 263:1371-1376. (Pubitemid 20069943)
13. Mennin SP, Cole McGrew M. 2000. Scholarship in teaching and best evidence medical education: Synergy for teaching and learning. Med Teach 22:468-471.
14. Navalta JW, Lyons TS. 2010. Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers. Adv Physiol Educ 34:170-173.
15. Provenzale JM, Robert J, Stanley RJ. 2006. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. J Nucl Med Technol 34:92-99. (Pubitemid 46931026)
16. Rennie D. 2003. Editorial peer review: Its development and rationale. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, editors. Peer review in health sciences. 2 ed. London: BMJ Books. pp 1-13.
17. Schroter S, Black N, Evans N, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R. 2004. Effects of training on quality of peer review: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 328(7441):673.
18. Schroter S, Tite L, Hutchings A, Black N. 2006. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. JAMA 295:314-317. (Pubitemid 43112960)
19. Simpson KJ. 2008. Reviewing and original research manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A guide for students and professionals. Int J Exerc Sci 1:43-49.
20. Van Rooyen S, Evans GF, Smith R, Black N. 1998. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 280:234-237. (Pubitemid 28493892)