메뉴 건너뛰기
American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 170-173
Student peer review decisions on submitted manuscripts are as stringent as faculty peer reviewers
Author keywords

Peer review process; Student appraisal; Student versus faculty comparison
Indexed keywords

EID: 78649791825     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: 15221229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00046.2010     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)
References (19)
  • 1
    • 0028304432 scopus 로고
    • Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts
    • Abby M, Massey MD, Galandiuk S, Polk HC. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts. JAMA 272: 105-107, 1994.
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 105-107
    • Abby, M.1    Massey, M.D.2    Galandiuk, S.3    Polk, H.C.4
  • 3
    • 0033524998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The importance of reviewers
    • Bloom FE. The importance of reviewers. Science 283: 789, 1999.
    • (1999) Science , vol.283 , pp. 789
    • Bloom, F.E.1
  • 4
    • 0031684201 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance
    • Callaham ML, Wears RL, Waeckerle JF. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance. Ann Emerg Med 32: 318-322, 1998.
    • (1998) Ann Emerg Med , vol.32 , pp. 318-322
    • Callaham, M.L.1    Wears, R.L.2    Waeckerle, J.F.3
  • 5
    • 0031974522 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded
    • Davidhoff F. Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded. Ann Intern Med 128: 66-68, 1998.
    • (1998) Ann Intern Med , vol.128 , pp. 66-68
    • Davidhoff, F.1
  • 6
    • 0034562333 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks
    • Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 70: 287-322, 2000.
    • (2000) Rev Educ Res , vol.70 , pp. 287-322
    • Falchikov, N.1    Goldfinch, J.2
  • 7
    • 0035673776 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing
    • Guilford WH. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 167-175, 2001.
    • (2001) Adv Physiol Educ , vol.25 , pp. 167-175
    • Guilford, W.H.1
  • 8
    • 0037024264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring the quality of editorial peer review
    • Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA 287: 2786-2790, 2002.
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2786-2790
    • Jefferson, T.1    Wager, E.2    Davidoff, F.3
  • 9
    • 0032086131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A different method of teaching peer review systems
    • Lightfoot TJ. A different method of teaching peer review systems. Advan Physiol Educ 19: 57-61, 1998.
    • (1998) Advan Physiol Educ , vol.19 , pp. 57-61
    • Lightfoot, T.J.1
  • 10
    • 0345840096 scopus 로고
    • A checklist to help students analyze published articles in basic medical sciences
    • Rangachari PK, Mierson S. A checklist to help students analyze published articles in basic medical sciences. Adv Physiol Educ 13: 21-25, 1995.
    • (1995) Adv Physiol Educ , vol.13 , pp. 21-25
    • Rangachari, P.K.1    Mierson, S.2
  • 11
    • 0035457208 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Calibrated peer review an application to increase student reading & writing skills
    • Robinson R. Calibrated peer review an application to increase student reading & writing skills. Am Biol Teach 63: 474-480, 2001.
    • (2001) Am Biol Teach , vol.63 , pp. 474-480
    • Robinson, R.1
  • 12
    • 0036796515 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The peer-review process
    • Rowland F. The peer-review process. Learn Publish 15: 247-258, 2002.
    • (2002) Learn Publish , vol.15 , pp. 247-258
    • Rowland, F.1
  • 13
    • 8344272908 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees
    • Seals DR, Tanaka H. Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees. Adv Physiol Educ 23: 52-58, 2000.
    • (2000) Adv Physiol Educ , vol.23 , pp. 52-58
    • Seals, D.R.1    Tanaka, H.2
  • 14
    • 1642325520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
    • Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 328: 673-677, 2004.
    • (2004) Br Med J , vol.328 , pp. 673-677
    • Schroter, S.1    Black, N.2    Evans, S.3    Carpenter, J.4    Godlee, F.5    Smith, R.6
  • 15
    • 78649767363 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing and original research manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: a guide for students and professionals
    • Simpson KJ. Reviewing and original research manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: a guide for students and professionals. Int J Exerc Sci 1: 43-49, 2008.
    • (2008) Int J Exerc Sci , vol.1 , pp. 43-49
    • Simpson, K.J.1
  • 16
    • 0030870950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: reform or revolution?
    • Smith R. Peer review: reform or revolution? Br Med J 315: 759-760, 1997.
    • (1997) Br Med J , vol.315 , pp. 759-760
    • Smith, R.1
  • 17
    • 0032285568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities
    • Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educ Res 68: 249-276, 1998.
    • (1998) Rev Educ Res , vol.68 , pp. 249-276
    • Topping, K.1
  • 18
    • 0033514073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial
    • Van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. Br Med J 318: 23-27, 1999.
    • (1999) Br Med J , vol.318 , pp. 23-27
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3    Black, N.4    Smith, R.5
  • 19
    • 0009430298 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The shortcomings of peer review
    • Wager E, Jefferson T. The shortcomings of peer review. Learn Publish 14: 257-263, 2001.
    • (2001) Learn Publish , vol.14 , pp. 257-263
    • Wager, E.1    Jefferson, T.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.