Internet Research Ethics: Past, Present, and Future

The Handbook of Internet Studies

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 83-108

  Buchanan, Elizabeth A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

AoIR document, plurality of ways ethical decisions made; Current dialogue of Internet research ethics; Dias's choice, issue of identification, anonymization and pseudonymization; Ethics boards worldwide articulated in three principles; Ethics boards, and "mission creep" American Historical Association (AHA) and OHA, removing IRB review; Internet research ethics past, present and future; Internet based research, contests and methodologies ethics, and application of "rules"; Issue of consent confounded in use of databanks and data repositories; Online survey products, as Zoomerang, SurveyMonkey, and QuestionPro online research tools; Research misconduct, Martin Rimm's work "information superhighway" to access pornographic images

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865374337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444314861.ch5     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm.
2. American Historical Association (AHA) (2008). AHA Statement on IRBs and oral history research. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2008/0802/0802aha1.cfm.
3. American Psychological Association (APA) (2004). Report from the board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet.
4. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) & Ess, C. (2002). Ethical decision making and Internet research. Retrieved November 3, 2008, from www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
5. Baker, A. (2009). Media, ethics, and research subjects: Rockin' out in the NY Times. International Journal of Internet Research, (2)1.
6. Barbaro, M., & Zeller, T., Jr (2006). A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 4417749. New York Times, August 9. Retrieved October 1, 2008, from http:/www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?ex=1312776000.
7. Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (1982). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Berry, D. (2004). Internet research: Privacy, ethics and alienation: An open source approach. Internet Research, 14(4), 323-32.
9. Bober, M. (2004). Virtual youth research: An exploration of methodological and ethical dilemmas from a British perspective. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 288-316). Hershey: Idea Group.
10. Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 217-31.
11. Buchanan, E. (ed.) (2004). Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
12. Buchanan, E., & Ess, C. (2008). Internet research ethics: The field and its critical issues. In K. Himma & H. Tavani (eds.), The Handbook of Computer and Information Ethics (pp. 272-92). Boston: Wiley.
13. Buchanan, E., & Hvizdak, E. (2009). Online survey tools: Ethical and methodological concerns of human research ethics committees. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) 4(2), 37-48.
14. Buchanan, E., & Hvizdak, E. (in progress). Bibliometric counts of Internet research ethics.
15. Burk, D., Allen, G., & Ess, C. (2008). Ethical approaches to robotic data gathering in academic research. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 1(1), 9. Retrieved October 1 2008 from www.ijire.uwm.edu/burk.pdf.
16. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News (2006). Patriot Act fears prompt universities to patriate computers. CBC News, October 31. Retrieved April 5, 2008, from http:/www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2006/10/31/patriot-act.html.
17. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, (with 2000, 2002, 2005 amendments). Ottawa: Interagency Secretariat on Research Ethics.
18. Capurro, R. (2008). Intercultural information ethics. In E. Buchanan & K. Henderson (eds.), Cases in Library and Information Science Ethics (pp. 118-36). Jefferson: McFarland.
19. Carnegie Mellon University. (1995). Internal memorandum. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/venus.soci.niu.edu/~cudigest/rimm/cmu.report.
20. Carusi, A., & Jirotka, M. (forthcoming). From data archives to ethical labyrinths. Qualitative Research.
21. Cathcart, R., & Gumpert, G. (1983). Mediated interpersonal communication: Toward a new typology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 267-77.
22. Center for Advanced Study (2005). Improving the system for protecting human subjects: Counteracting IRB mission creep, November 5. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/whitepaper/summary.html.
23. Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues in Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421-34.
24. Clark, M., & Sharf, B. (2007). The dark side of truth(s): Ethical dilemmas in researching the personal. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 399-416.
25. Dias, K. (2003). The Ana Sanctuary: Women's Pro-Anorexia Narratives in Cyberspace. Journal of International Women's Studies, 4(2), 31-45.
26. Dibble, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. The Village Voice, December 21, 36-42.
27. Dyer, K. (2001). Ethical Challenges of Medicine and Research on the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e23.
28. Elefant, C. (2008). Do employers using Facebook for background checks face legal risks? Legal BlogWatch, March 11. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2008/03/do-employers-us.html.
29. Ess, C. (2003). The Cathedral or the Bazaar? The AoIR document on Internet research ethics as an exercise in open source ethics. In M. Consalvo et al. (eds.), Internet Research Annual Volume 1: Selected Papers from the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000-2002, 95-103. New York: Peter Lang.
30. Ess, C. (2006). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 215-26.
31. Ess, C. (2007). Universal information ethics? Ethical pluralism and social justice. In E. Rooksby & J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Social Justice (pp. 69-92). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
32. European Union Data Privacy Protection Acts (1995). Directive 95/46/EC.
33. European Union Data Privacy Protection Acts (2006). Directive 2006/24/EC.
34. Evans, J., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219.
35. Eysenbach, G., & Wyatt, J. (2002). Using the Internet for surveys and health research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2). http:/www.jmir.org/2002/2/e13/.
36. Feenberg, A., Bakardjieva M., & Goldie, J. (2004). User-centered Internet research: The ethical challenge. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 338-50). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
37. Frankel, M., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and Legal Aspects of Human Subjects Research on the Internet. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
38. Gallager, M. P. (2008). MySpace, Facebook pages called key to dispute over insurance coverage for eating disorders. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1201779829458.
39. Gallin, J., & Ognibene, F. (2007). Principles and Practices of Clinical Research. Boston: Academic Press.
40. Gunn, H. (2002). Web-based surveys: changing the survey process. First Monday, 7(12). Retrieved July 17, 2008, from http:/www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/gunn/.
41. Hvizdak, E. (2008). Creating a web of attribution in feminist blogs. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 1(1). Retrieved December 10, 2008, from www.ijire.uwm.edu/hvizdak.pdf.
42. Im, E., Chee, W., Tsai, H., Bender, M., & Lin, H. (2007). Internet communities for recruitment of cancer patients into an internet survey: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(7), 1261-9.
43. Israel, M., & Hay, I., (2006). Research Ethics for Social Scientists. London: Sage.
44. Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (1999). Taming the cyber frontier: Techniques for improving online surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 323-37.
45. Kraut, R. et al. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs' advisory group on the conduct of research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105-17.
46. Lawson, D. (2004). Blurring the Boundaries: Ethical Considerations for Online Research Using Synchronous CMC Forums. In Buchanan, E. (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 80-100). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
47. Lipinski, T. (2008). Emerging legal issues in the collection and dissemination of Internetsourced research data: Part I, basic tort law issues and negligence. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 1(1), 92-114. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.uwm.edu/Dept/SOIS/cipr/ijire/ijire_1.1_lipinski.pdf.
48. Markham, A. (1998). Life Online. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
49. Markham, A. (2006). Method as ethic, ethic as method. Journal of Information Ethics, 15(2), 37-54.
50. Moodely, K., & Myer, L. (2007). Health research ethics committees in South Africa 12 years into democracy. BMC Med Ethics, 8(1). http:/ukpmc.ac.uk/articlerender.cgi?artid=887112.
51. Mustanski, B. S. (2001). Getting wired: exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. The Journal of Sex Research. The Free Library (November, 1). Retrieved December 4, 2008, from http:/www.thefreelibrary.com/.
52. Nancarrow, C., Pallister, J., & Brace, I. (2001). A new research medium, new research populations and seven deadly sins for Internet researchers. Qualitative Market Research, 4(3), 136-49.
53. Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2005). Obfuscated databases and group privacy. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 7-11, Alexandria, VA. http:/doi.acm.org/10.1145/1102120.1102135.
54. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC.
55. National Committees for Research Ethics in the Sciences and the Humanities (NESH), Norway (2003). Research Ethics Guidelines for Internet Research. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.etikkom.no/English/Publications/internet03/view_publikasjon.
56. National Health and Research Council, Australia (2007). History of ethics and ethical review of human research in Australia. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/history.htm.
57. National Health Service, United Kingdom (1999). National research ethics service and the research ethics framework (REF) of the ESRC (Economic and Social Research Council) general guidelines. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_Re_Ethics_Frame_tcm6-11291.pdf.
58. Nuremburg Code ([1947] 1949). In A. Mitscherlich & F. Mielke (eds.), Doctors of Infamy: The Story of the Nazi Medical Crimes (pp. xxiii-xxv). New York: Schuman.
59. Olsen, S. (2006). Military recruiters are newest MySpace buddy. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6097875-7.html.
60. Reid, E. (1996). Informed consent in the study of online communities: A reflection on the effects of computer-mediated social research. Information Society, 12(2), 169-74.
61. Roberts, L., Smith, L., & Pollock, C. (2004). Conducting ethical research online: Respect for individuals, identities, and the ownership of words. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 156-73). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
62. St Amant, K. (2004). International digital studies: A research approach for examining international online interactions. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 317-37). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
63. Schneier, B. (2007). Anonymity and the Netflix dataset. Schneier on security blog. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/12/anonymity_and_t_2.html.
64. Scriven, A., & Smith-Ferrier, S. (2003). The application of online surveys for workplace health research. Journal Of The Royal Society Of Health, 123(2), 95-101.
65. Siebert, J., Plattner, S., & Rubin, P. (2002). How (not) to regulate social and behavioral research. Professional Ethics Report, 15(2), 1-3.
66. Simsek, Z., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). A primer on Internet organizational surveys. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 218-35.
67. Sixsmith J. A., & Murray C. D. (2001). Ethical Issues in the documentary data analysis of Internet posts and archives? Qualitative Health Research, 11(3), 424-32.
68. Skitka, L., & Sargis, E. (2006). The Internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529-55.
69. Slater M., Antley A., Davison A., Swapp D., et al. (2006). A virtual reprise of the Stanley Milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1(1), e39. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.
70. Stern, S. (2004). Studying adolescents online: A consideration of ethical issues. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 274-87). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
71. Sveningsson, M. (2004). Ethics in internet ethnography. In E. Buchanan (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 45-61). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
72. Technorati. (2007). State of the blogosphere 2008. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/.
73. Thorseth, M. (2003). Applied Ethics in Internet Research. Trondheim: Programme for Applied Ethics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
74. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
75. United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71.
76. Van Gelder, L. (1985). The strange case of the electronic lover. In C. Dunlop & R. Kling (eds.), Computerization and Controversy (pp. 364-375). San Diego: Academic Press.
77. Walstrom, M. (2004). Ethics and engagement in communication scholarship: Analyzing public online support groups as researcher/participant-experiencer. In Buchanan, E. (ed.), Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and Controversies (pp. 174-202). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
78. Whitty, M., Baker, A., & Inman, J. (eds.) (2007). Online Matchmaking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
79. World Medical Association. (1964). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm.
80. Zimmer, M. (2008a). On the "anonymity" of the Facebook data set. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from http:/michaelzimmer.org/2008/09/30/on-the-anonymity-of-thefacebook-dataset/.
81. Zimmer, M. (2008b). Preface: critical perspectives on Web 2.0 First Monday, 13(3). Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http:/www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2137/1943.