Universal information ethics? Ethical pluralism and social justice

Information Technology and Social Justice

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 69-92

  Ess, Charles ^a  

^a DRURY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899386854     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-968-7.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Ames, R., & Rosemont, H. (1998). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation. New York: Ballantine Books.
2. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). (2002). Decision-making and ethical Internet research. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
3. Aristotle. (1943). Aristotle's politics (B. Jowett, trans.). New York: Modern Library.
4. Aristotle. (1968). Metaphysics I-IX, with an English translation by Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Barber, B. (1995). Jihad versus McWorld. New York: Times Books.
6. Bizer, J. (2003). Grundrechte im netz: Von der freien meinungsäußerung bis zum recht auf eigentum. In C. Schulzki-Haddouti (Ed.), Bürgerrechte im netz (pp. 21-29). Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. Available at http://www.bpb.de/publikationen/UZX6DW,,0,B%fcrgerrechte_im_Net.html.
7. Burkhardt, J., Thompson, P., & Peterson, T. R. (2000). The first European congress on agricultural and food ethics and follow-up workshop on ethics and food biotechnology: A U.S. perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(4), 327-332.
8. Chan, J. (2003). Confucian attitudes towards ethical pluralism. In R. Madsen & T. B. Strong (Eds.), The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern world (pp. 129-153). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Chen, Y. (2005). Privacy in China. Unpublished master's thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
10. Eickelman, D. F. (2003). Islam and ethical pluralism. In R. Madsen & T. B. Strong (Eds.), The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern world (pp. 161-180). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Elberfeld, R. (2002). Resonanz als grundmotiv ostasiatischer ethik [Resonance as a fundamental motif of East Asian ethics]. In R. Elberfeld & G. Wohlfart (Eds.), Komparative ethik: Das gute leben zwischen den kulturen [Comparative ethics: The good life between cultures] (pp.131-141). Cologne, Germany: Edition Chora.
12. Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 195-203. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_elgesem.html.
13. Ess, C. (2004a). Beyond contemptus mundi and cartesian dualism: Western resurrection of the bodysubject and (re)new(ed) coherencies with eastern approaches to life/death. In G. Wohlfart & H-G. Moeller (Eds.), Philosophie des todes: Death philosophy East and West (pp. 15-36). Munich, Germany: Chora.
14. Ess, C. (2004b). Moral imperatives for life in an intercultural global village. In R. Cavalier (Ed.), The Internet and our moral lives (pp. 161-193). Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Ess, C. (2005a). Discourse ethics. In C. Mitcham et al. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics. New York: MacMillan Reference.
16. Ess, C. (2005b). Can the local reshape the global? Ethical imperatives for humane intercultural communication online. In J. Frühbauer, R. Capurro & T. Hausmanninger (Eds.), Localizing the Internet: Ethical aspects in an intercultural perspective. Schriftenreihe des ICIE, Bd 4. Munich, Germany: International Center for Information Ethics.
17. Ess, C. (2005c). What is information ethics? Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.drury.edu/ess/CAP04/cap04infoethics.html.
18. Ess, C. (2005d). "Lost in translation"?: Intercultural dialogues on privacy and information ethics (Introduction to special issue on privacy and data privacy protection in Asia). Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 1-6.
19. Ess, C. (2006a, forthcoming). Culture and communication on global networks: Cultural diversity, moral relativism, and hope for a global ethic? Or: Can Plato's cybernetes /Confucius' junzi navigate an interconnected world? In J. Weckert & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Moral philosophy and information technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Ess, C. (2006b, forthcoming). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. In L. Floridi (Ed.), Information ethics: Agents, artifacts and new cultural perspectives. Special issue of Ethics and Information Technology.
21. Floridi, L. (2003). What is the philosophy of information? In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Available at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pci/downloads/introduction.pdf.
22. Hamelink, C. (2000). The ethics of cyberspace. London: Sage.
23. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49.
24. rd ed., pp. 109-136). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Kitiyadisai, K. (2005). Privacy rights and protection: foreign values in modern Thai context. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 17-26.
26. Lü, Y. (2002). Xin xi lun li xue [Chinese information ethics]. Hunan, China: Middle South University Publication.
27. Lü, Y. (2005). Personal e-mail to the author.
28. Lundh, L. G. (2004). En fornemmelse for forskning. En empirisk undersøgelse af forskningsetik i Dansk Internetforskning [A feeling for research: An empirical investigation of Internet research ethics within the humanities in Denmark]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
29. Madsen, R., & Strong, T. (2003). The many and the one: Religious and secular perspectives on ethical pluralism in the modern world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30. Mizutani, M., Dorsey, J., & Moor, J. (2004). The Internet and Japanese conceptions of privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 121-128.
31. Nakada, M. (2005). Personal e-mail to the author.
32. Nakada, M., & Tamura, T. (2005). Japanese conceptions of privacy: An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 27-36.
33. National Institutes of Health, Office of Human Subjects Research. (2005). Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Department of Health and Human Services, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/45cfr46.html.
34. National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH). (2001). Guidelines for research ethics in the social sciences, law and the humanities. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.etikkom.no/Engelsk/NESH/Publications/NESHguide.
35. NESH. (2003). Research ethics guidelines for Internet research. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://www.etikkom.no/Engelsk/NESH/Publications/internet03.
36. Persondataloven [Personal Data Law, Denmark]. (2001, April). Lov. Nr. 429 af 31. Maj 2000 som ændret ved lov. Nr. 280 af 25. Retrieved December 2, 2003, from http://147.29.40.90/_GETDOC_/ACCN/A20000042930-REGL. English version available at http://www.datatilsynet.dk/eng/index.html.
37. Ramasoota, P. (2001). Privacy: A philosophical sketch and a search for a Thai perception. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 4(2), 89-107.
38. Reidenberg, J. R. (2000). Resolving conflicting international data privacy rules in cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52, 1315-1376.
39. Stahl, B. C. (2004). Responsible management of information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.
40. Tamura, T. (2004). Unpublished manuscript.
41. Tang, R. (2002). Approaches to privacy-the Hong Kong experience. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.pco.org.hk/english/infocentre/speech_20020222.html.
42. Tavani, H. (2004). Ethics and technology: Ethical issues in an age of information and communication technology. New York: Wiley.
43. Taylor, C. (2002). Democracy, inclusive and exclusive. In R. Madsen, W. M. Sullivan, A. Swiderl, & S. M. Tipton (Eds.), Meaning and modernity: Religion, polity, and self (pp. 181-194). Berkeley: University of California Press.
44. Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 47-66.
45. Tu, W.-M. (1999). Humanity as embodied love: Exploring filial piety as a global ethical perspective. In M. Zlomislic & D. Goicoechea (Eds.), Jen Agape Tao with Tu Wei-Ming (pp. 28-37). Binghamton, NY: Institute of Global Cultural Studies.
46. Walther, J. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 205-216. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_walther.html.
47. Warren, K. J. (1990). The power and the promise of ecological feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 123-146.
48. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: Wiley.
49. Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Yasukawa, J., & Ando, T. (2002). Online therapy- characteristics and problems for media mediated social service activities. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://ofc-hjm.misc.hit-u.ac.jp/hjm/MyDesk/Bib/2002a_1.pdf.
51. Zhang, N. (2005). Personal e-mail to the author.