Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies

Proceedings of ISSI 2011 - 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 763-774

  Shelton, R D ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a WTEC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BIBLIOMETRIC; BUSINESS SECTOR; GOVERNMENT FUNDING; HIGHER EDUCATION; MULTIVARIATE LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL; TRADE OFF;

FINANCE;

EID: 84865370802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Almeida, J. A. S., Pais, A., & Formosinho, S. J. (2009). Science indicators and science patterns in Europe. Journal of Informetrics 3, 134-142.
2. Castro-Martinez, E., Jimenez-Saez, F., & Ortega-Colomer, F. J. (2009). Science and technology policies: A tale of political use, misuse and abuse of traditional R&D indicators. Scientometrics 80, 827-844.
3. Crespi, G. A., & Geuna, A. (2008). An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981-2002. Research Policy 37, 565-579.
4. Criscuolo, P. (2006). The 'home advantage' effect and patent families. A comparison of OECD triadic patents, the USTPTO and EPO. Scientometrics, 66(1), 23-41.
5. Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox'. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450-1464.
6. th International Conference on S&T Indicators, Leiden, Sept. 2010. Posted at http://itri2.org/s/.
7. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
8. Glanzel, W., Debackere, K., & Meyer, M. (2008). 'Triad' or 'tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics 74, 71-88.
9. Godin, B. (2007). Science, accounting and statistics: The input-output framework. Research Policy 36, 1388-1403.
10. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
11. Hung, W. C., Lee, L. C., & Tsai, M. H. (2009). An international comparison of relative contributions to academic productivity. Scientometrics 81, 703-718.
12. Jin, B. & Rousseau, R. (2005) China's quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth, but low impact. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, July, 2005.
13. Leydesdorff, L. (1990). The Prediction of Science Indicators Using Information Theory. Scientometrics 19, 297-324.
14. Leydesdorff, L. (2000). Is the European Union Becoming a Single Publication System? Scientometrics, 47(2), 265-280.
15. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
16. Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538-1553.
17. Leydesdorff, L., & Gauthier, É. (1996). The Evaluation of National Performance in Selected Priority Areas using Scientometric Methods. Research Policy, 25, 431-450.
18. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2009). The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect. Scientometrics, 83(2), 355-362.
19. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2009a). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 353-362.
20. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2009b). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system Scientometrics, 78(1), 23-36.
21. Leydesdorff, L. & Zhou, P. (2005), Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics 63, 617-630.
22. Moed, H. F. (2002), Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 53, 281-296.
23. Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119.
24. Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399-418.
25. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing link between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
26. NSB (2010), Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. Arlington: National Science Foundation. NSB 10-1.
27. OECD (2010), Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: OECD. Volume 2010/1.
28. Sampat, B. N., Mowery, D. C., & Sidonis, A. A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: a re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371-1390.
29. Scopus (2010) http://www.scopus.com/home.url Accessed Dec. 2, 2010.
30. Shelton, R. D., (2008), Relations between national research investment and publication output: Application to an American paradox. Scientometrics, 74(2), 191-205
31. Shelton, R. D. & Foland, P. (2008), National Efficiencies in Publishing Scientific Papers. 10th International Conference on S&T Indicators, Vienna, Sept., 2008. Posted at http://itri2.org/s/.
32. Shelton, R. D. & Foland, P. (2010), The Race for World Leadership of Science and Technology: Status and Forecasts. Science Focus 5, pp. 1-9 (Feb. 2010).
33. Shelton, R. D., Foland, P., & Gorelskyy, R. (2009). Do new SCI journals have a different national bias? Scientometrics 79, 351-363.