Relations between national research investment and publication output: Application to an American Paradox

Scientometrics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 191-205

  Shelton, Robert D ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949140288     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-0212-2     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. AAAS 2005 Guide to R&D Data: Historical Data American Association for the Advancement of Science Washington AAAS (2005), Guide to R&D Data: Historical Data. Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/guihist.htm
2. Adams, J., Griliches, Z. (1996), Measuring science: An exploration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 12664-12670.
3. Archambult, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Cote, G., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y. (2005), Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities. Proceedings of the ISSI 2005 Conference, Stockholm, July 24-28, 2005. pp 149-158.
4. ISI (2004), National Science Indicators 1981-2004, Standard Version. Philadelphia: Thompson ISI. (CD). The 2004 edition was usually used since it has EU15 data, instead of the EU25 data in subsequent years.
5. Jin, B., Rousseau, R. (2005), China's quantitative expansion phase: Exponential growth, but low impact. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Stockholm, July, 2005.
6. Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P. (2005), Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63: 617-630.
7. Moed, H. F. (2002), Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 53: 281-296.
8. NSB (2006), Science and Engineering Indicators - 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. (NSB-06-1). Also previous editions NSB (2002) and NSB (2004).
9. OECD (2006), Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: OECD. Volume 2005/2.
10. Peoples' Daily, Beijing, China, March 1, 2006.
11. Shelton, R. D., Holdridge, G. M. (2004), The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology: Qualitative and quantitative indicators. Scientometrics, 60: 353-363.
12. Shelton, R. D. (2006), Do new SCI journals have a different national bias? WTEC Working Paper 05-02. Review copy at: http://itri2.org/s/Bpaper/ current.doc
13. Tijssen, R. J. W., van Wijk, E. (1999), In search of the European paradox: an international comparison of Europe's scientific performance and knowledge flows in information and communication technologies research. Research Policy, 28(5): 519-543.