An empirical study of scientific production: A cross country analysis, 1981-2002

Research Policy

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 565-579

  Crespi, Gustavo A ^a   Geuna, Aldo ^b,c  

^a INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

International spillovers; Lag structure; Productivity of science; Returns to HERD investment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INVESTMENTS;

INTERNATIONAL SPILLOVERS; LAG STRUCTURE; PRODUCTIVITY OF SCIENCE;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 41749118158     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adams J. Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth. The Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 673-702
2. Adams J., and Griliches Z. Research productivity in a system of universities. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 49-50 (1998) 127-162
3. Adams, J., Bailey T., Jackson L., Scott P., Pendlebury D., Small H., 1998 Benchmarking of the international standing of research in England: report of a consultancy study on bibliometric analysis. CPSE, University of Leeds. 108 pp. ISBN 1 901981 04 5.
4. Arundel A., and Geuna A. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 (2004) 559-580
5. Bonaccorsi A., and Daraio C. A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation 12 (2003) 47-69
6. Crespi, G., Geuna, A. 2005. Modelling and Measuring Scientific Production: Results for a Panel of OECD Countries, SEWPS 133, SPRU University of Sussex, Brighton.
7. Crespi, G., Geuna, A. 2004. The Productivity of Science. Brighton: SPRU Report prepared for the office of science and technology (OST), Department of trade and industry (DTI), UK. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/crespiost2.pdf.
8. Dasgupta P., and David P.A. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 (1994) 487-521
9. European Commission, 2003 Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators, Belgium.
10. Geuna A. The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research (1999), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
11. Geuna A. The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences. Journal of Economic Issues 35 (2001) 607-632
12. Geuna A., and Nesta L. University patenting and its effects on academic research. The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35 (2006) 790-807
13. Greene W. Econometric Analysis (1993), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
14. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1979) 92-116
15. Guellec D., and Van Pottelsberghe B. R&D and productivity growth: panel analysis of 16 OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies 33 (2001) 103-126
16. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., TrajteNberg, M., 2001. 'The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools', NBER Working Paper Series, 8498.
17. Jacobsson S., and Rickne A. How large is the Swedish academic sector really? A critical analysis of the use of science and technology indicators. Research Policy 33 (2004) 1355-1372
18. Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79 (1989) 957-970
19. Johnes J., and Johnes G. Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics: a frontier analysis. Economics of Education Review 14 (1995) 301-314
20. Jones C. R&D-based models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995) 759-784
21. Kolenikov, S., 2000. 'Icomp: Information Complexity Measures', http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s410201.html, accessed on 02/06/2004.
22. Klette T., and Johansen F. Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-So-Fixed Effect Model. In: Encaoua D., Hall B., Lisney F., and Mairesse J. (Eds). The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London 367-397
23. Klevorick A., Levin A., Nelson R., and Winter S. On the sources and the significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24 (1995) 185-205
24. Lev B., and Sougiannis T. The capitalisation, amortization and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting Economics 21 (1996) 107-138
25. Maddala G.S., and Wu S. Comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (1999) 631-652
26. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20 (1991) 1-12
27. Mowery D., Nelson R., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation (2004), Stanford Business Books, Stanford
28. Narin F., Hamilton K., and Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26 (1997) 317-330
29. OECD. Turning Science into Business. Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organisations (2003), OECD, Paris
30. OECD. The Sources of Economic Growth in OECD Countries (2003), OECD, Paris
31. OECD. Benchmarking Industry-Science Relationships (2002), OECD, Paris
32. OECD. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research & Development Expenditures (2002), OECD, Paris 254
33. Ravenscraft D., and Scherer F.M. The lag structure of returns to research and development. Applied Economics 14 (1982) 603-620
34. Scott, A., Steyn, G., Geuna, A., Brusoni, S., Steinmueller, E., 2001. The Economic Returns to Basic Research and Benefits of University-Industry Relationships. A report commissioned by the OST-DTI, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, 2001. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/publications/econreturnsost.pdf.
35. Steinmueller W.E. Economics of Science. International Encyclopaedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences 20 (2001), Elsevier, Oxford pp.13664-13668