Lack of response to unaligned chromosomes in mammalian female gametes

Cell Cycle

Volumn 11, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 3011-3018

  Sebestova, Jaroslava ^a,b   Danylevska, Anna ^a,b   Novakova, Lucia ^a,b   Kubelka, Michal ^a   Anger, Martin ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^b CENTRAL EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Anaphase; Aneuploidy; Cell cycle; Chromosome segregation; Meiosis; Oocytes

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; NOCODAZOLE;

ANAPHASE; ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL MATURATION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAMETE; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MALE; MAMMAL CELL; MEIOSIS; METAPHASE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; POLAR BODY; SOMATIC CELL;

EID: 84865339153     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.21398     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2:280-91; PMID:11283700; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/35066065.
2. Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. Human female meiosis: what makes a good egg go bad? Trends Genet 2008; 24:86-93; PMID:18192063; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig. 2007.11.010.
3. Hornak M, Jeseta M, Musilova P, Pavlok A, Kubelka M, Motlik J, et al. Frequency of aneuploidy related to age in porcine oocytes. PLoS One 2011; 6:e18892; PMID:21556143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018892.
4. Chiang T, Duncan FE, Schindler K, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1522-8; PMID:20817534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2010.06.069.
5. Lister LM, Kouznetsova A, Hyslop LA, Kalleas D, Pace SL, Barel JC, et al. Age-related meiotic segregation errors in mammalian oocytes are preceded by depletion of cohesin and Sgo2. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1511-21; PMID:20817533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.023.
6. Tachibana-Konwalski K, Godwin J, van der Weyden L, Champion L, Kudo NR, Adams DJ, et al. Rec8-containing cohesin maintains bivalents without turnover during the growing phase of mouse oocytes. Genes Dev 2010; 24:2505-16; PMID:20971813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.605910.
7. Revenkova E, Herrmann K, Adelfalk C, Jessberger R. Oocyte cohesin expression restricted to predictyate stages provides full fertility and prevents aneuploidy. Curr Biol 2010; 20:1529-33; PMID:20817531; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2010.08.024.
8. Holt JE, Jones KT. Control of homologous chromosome division in the mammalian oocyte. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 15:139-47; PMID:19179408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gap007.
9. Homer H. New insights into the genetic regulation of homologue disjunction in mammalian oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 133:209-22; PMID:21335952; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000324118.
10. Vogt E, Kirsch-Volders M, Parry J, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Spindle formation, chromosome segregation and the spindle checkpoint in mammalian oocytes and susceptibility to meiotic error. Mutat Res 2008; 651:14-29; PMID:18096427; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.10.015.
11. McGuinness BE, Anger M, Kouznetsova A, Gil-Bernabé AM, Helmhart W, Kudo NR, et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Biol 2009; 19:369-80; PMID:19249208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.064.
12. Meraldi P, Draviam VM, Sorger PK. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev Cell 2004; 7:45-60; PMID:15239953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.006.
13. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:1301-10; PMID:7962091; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301.
14. Clute P, Pines J. Temporal and spatial control of cyclin B1 destruction in metaphase. Nat Cell Biol 1999; 1:82-7; PMID:10559878; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/10049.
15. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:379-93; PMID:17426725; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nrm2163.
16. Lane SI, Yun Y, Jones KT. Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension. Development 2012; 139:1947-55; PMID:22513370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.077040.
17. Nagaoka SI, Hodges CA, Albertini DF, Hunt PA. Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors. Curr Biol 2011; 21:651-7; PMID:21497085; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.003.
18. Koehler KE, Schrump SE, Cherry JP, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Near-human aneuploidy levels in female mice with homeologous chromosomes. Curr Biol 2006; 16:R579-80; PMID:16890511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.018.
19. Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 2009; 81:768-76; PMID:19553597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biol-reprod.109.077909.
20. Kouznetsova A, Lister L, Nordenskjöld M, Herbert M, Höög C. Bi-orientation of achiasmatic chromosomes in meiosis I oocytes contributes to aneuploidy in mice. Nat Genet 2007; 39:966-8; PMID:17618286; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2065.
21. Dudas A, Ahmad S, Gregan J. Sgo1 is required for cosegregation of sister chromatids during achiasmate meiosis I. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:951-5; PMID:21330786; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.6.15032.
22. Sakuno T, Tanaka K, Hauf S, Watanabe Y. Repositioning of aurora B promoted by chiasmata ensures sister chromatid mono-orientation in meiosis I. Dev Cell 2011; 21:534-45; PMID:21920317; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel. 2011.08.012.
23. Peters JM. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol Cell 2002; 9:931-43; PMID:12049731; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097- 2765(02)00540-3.
24. Jones KT, Lane SI. Chromosomal, metabolic, environmental, and hormonal origins of aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes. Exp Cell Res 2012; 318:1394-9; PMID:22394508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.012.
25. Wang ZB, Schatten H, Sun QY. Why is chromosome segregation error in oocytes increased with maternal aging? Physiology (Bethesda) 2011; 26:314-25; PMID:22013190; http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00020.2011.
26. Khodjakov A, Pines J. Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:919-23; PMID:20885417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1010-919.
27. Musacchio A. Spindle assembly checkpoint: the third decade. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011; 366:3595-604; PMID:22084386; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2011.0072.
28. Hunt P, LeMaire R, Embury P, Sheean L, Mroz K. Analysis of chromosome behavior in intact mammalian oocytes: monitoring the segregation of a univalent chromosome during female meiosis. Hum Mol Genet 1995; 4:2007-12; PMID:8589675; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/4.11.2007.
29. LeMaire-Adkins R, Radke K, Hunt PA. Lack of checkpoint control at the metaphase/anaphase transition: a mechanism of meiotic nondisjunction in mammalian females. J Cell Biol 1997; 139:1611-9; PMID:9412457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.139.7.1611.