Frequency of aneuploidy related to age in porcine oocytes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Hornak, Miroslav ^b   Jeseta, Michal ^b   Musilova, Petra ^b   Pavlok, Antonin ^a   Kubelka, Michal ^a   Motlik, Jan ^a   Rubes, Jiri ^b   Anger, Martin ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Czech Republic)

^b VETERINARY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE MATURATION; SWINE; AGING; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; RODENTIA; SUS;

AGING; ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; OOCYTES; SWINE;

EID: 79955690982     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018892     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hassold T, Hunt P, (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2: 280-291.
2. Pacchierotti F, Adler ID, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Mailhes JB, (2007) Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells. Environ Res 104: 46-69.
3. Hunt P, Hassold T, (2002) Sex matters in meiosis. Science 296 New York, NY: 2181-2183.
4. Pellestor F, (1991) Differential distribution of aneuploidy in human gametes according to their sex. Hum Reprod 6: 1252-1258.
5. Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA, (2009) Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 81: 768-776.
6. Pan H, Ma P, Zhu W, Schultz R, (2008) Age-associated increase in aneuploidy and changes in gene expression in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 316: 397-407.
7. Zuccotti M, Boiani M, Garagna S, Redi C, (1998) Analysis of aneuploidy rate in antral and ovulated mouse oocytes during female aging. Mol Reprod Dev 50: 305-312.
8. Lechniak D, Switonski M, (1998) Aneuploidy in bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Chromosome Res 6: 504-506.
9. Nicodemo D, Pauciullo A, Cosenza G, Peretti V, Perucatti A, et al. (2010) Frequency of aneuploidy in in vitro-matured MII oocytes and corresponding first polar bodies in two dairy cattle (Bos taurus) breeds as determined by dual-color fluorescent in situ hybridization. Theriogenology 73: 523-529.
10. Sosnowski J, Waroczyk M, Switonski M, (2003) Chromosome abnormalities in secondary pig oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 60: 571-581.
11. Koenig JL, Stormshak F, (1993) Cytogenetic evaluation of ova from pubertal and third-estrous gilts. Biol Reprod 49: 1158-1162.
12. Vozdova M, Machatkova M, Kubickova S, Zudova D, Jokesova E, et al. (2001) Frequency of aneuploidy in pig oocytes matured in vitro and of the corresponding first polar bodies detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Theriogenology 56: 771-776.
13. Lechniak D, Warzych E, Pers-Kamczyc E, Sosnowski J, Antosik P, et al. (2007) Gilts and sows produce similar rate of diploid oocytes in vitro whereas the incidence of aneuploidy differs significantly. Theriogenology 68: 755-762.
14. Fragouli E, Escalona A, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Tormasi S, Alfarawati S, et al. (2009) Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors. Reprod Biomed Online 19: 228-237.
15. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Verlinsky Y, (2005) Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 111: 193-198.
16. Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C, Demaille J, (2003) Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum Genet 112: 195-203.
17. Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S, (2005) Effect of maternal age on the frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res 111: 206-212.
18. Keskintepe L, Sher G, Keskintepe M, (2007) Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in-situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. Reprod Biomed Online 15: 303-309.
19. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, et al. (2010) Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 95: 953-958.
20. Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L, Goossens V, Handyside A, et al. (2010) What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod 25: 575-577.
21. Vodicka P, Smetana KJ, Dvorankova B, Emerick T, Xu Y, et al. (2005) The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1049: 161-171.
22. Hornak M, Hulinska P, Musilova P, Kubickova S, Rubes J, (2009) Investigation of chromosome aneuploidies in early porcine embryos using comparative genomic hybridization. Cytogenet Genome Res 126: 210-216.
23. Benzacken B, Martin-Pont B, Bergere M, Hugues J, Wolf J, et al. (1998) Chromosome 21 detection in human oocyte fluorescence in situ hybridization: possible effect of maternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet 15: 105-110.
24. Hunt P, Hassold T, (2010) Female meiosis: coming unglued with age. Curr Biol 20: R699-702.