CDS: A fold-change based statistical test for concomitant identification of distinctness and similarity in gene expression analysis

Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 127-135

  Tchitchek, Nicolas ^a   Golib Dzib, José Felipe ^a   Targat, Brice ^a   Noth, Sebastian ^a   Benecke, Arndt ^a,b   Lesne, Annick ^a,c  

^a INSTITUT DES HAUTES ÉTUDES SCIENTIFIQUES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Distinctness; Fold change; Gene expression; Patient study; Similarity; Single measurement; Statistical test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCOMITANT EVALUATION OF DISTINCTNESS AND SIMILARITY STATISTICAL TEST; DATA ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; MEASUREMENT; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

ADENOMA; ADRENAL CORTEX; ADRENAL CORTEX NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84865333827     PISSN: 16720229     EISSN: 22103244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Pan W. A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:546-554.
2. Chen Y., Dougherty E.R., Bittner M.L. Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images. J Biomed Opt 1997, 2:364-374.
3. DeRisi J., Penland L., Brown P.O., Bittner M.L., Meltzer P.S., Ray M., et al. Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer. Nat Genet 1996, 14:457-460.
4. Barry W.T., Kernagis D.N., Dressman H.K., Griffis R.J., Hunter J.D., Olson J.A., et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and precision of microarray-based predictors of breast cancer biology and clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:2198-2206.
5. Cui X., Churchill G.A. Statistical tests for differential expression in cDNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol 2003, 4:210.
6. McCarthy D.J., Smyth G.K. Testing significance relative to a fold-change threshold is a TREAT. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:765-771.
7. Tusher V.G., Tibshirani R., Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:5116-5121.
8. Lunnstedt I., Speed T. Replicated microarray data. Stat Sin 2002, 12:31-46.
9. Baldi P., Long A.D. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t-test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:509-519.
10. Stein C. A two-sample test for a linear hypothesis whose power is independent of the variance. Ann Math Stat 1945, 16:243-258.
11. Chapman D.G. Some two sample tests. Ann Math Stat 1950, 21:601-606.
12. Lee J.C., Lin S.H. Generalized confidence intervals for the ratio of means of two normal populations. J Stat Plan Inference 2004, 123:49-60.
13. Armstrong P., Garrido R., de Dios Ortúzar J. Confidence intervals to bound the value of time. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 2001, 37:143-161.
14. Deng X., Xu J., Hui J., Wang C. Probability fold change: a robust computational approach for identifying differentially expressed gene lists. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009, 93:124-139.
15. Broberg P. Statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes. Genome Biol 2003, 4:R41.
16. Zennaro M.C., Jeunemaitre X. Mutations in KCNJ5 gene cause hyperaldosteronism. Circ Res 2011, 108:1417-1418.
17. Giordano T.J., Kuick R., Else T., Gauger P.G., Vinco M., Bauersfeld J., et al. Molecular classification and prognostication of adrenocortical tumors by transcriptome profiling. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:668-676.
18. Giordano T.J., Thomas D.G., Kuick R., Lizyness M., Misek D.E., Smith A.L., et al. Distinct transcriptional profiles of adrenocortical tumors uncovered by DNA microarray analysis. Am J Pathol 2003, 162:521-531.
19. Boulkroun S., Samson-Couterie B., Dzib J.F., Lefebvre H., Louiset E., Amar L., et al. Adrenal cortex remodeling and functional zona glomerulosa hyperplasia in primary aldosteronism. Hypertension 2010, 56:885-892.
20. Noth S., Brysbaert G., Pellay F.X., Benecke A. High-sensitivity transcriptome data structure and implications for analysis and biologic interpretation comparison of AB1700 and Affymetrix. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2006, 4:212-229.
21. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 1995, 57:289-300.
22. Storey J.D. The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Stat 2003, 31:2013-2035.
23. Barrett T., Troup D.B., Wilhite S.E., Ledoux P., Evangelista C., Kim I.F., et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39(Database issue):D1005-D1010.
24. Brysbaert G., Pellay F.X., Noth S., Benecke A. Quality assessment of transcriptome data using intrinsic statistical properties. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2010, 8:57-71.
25. Bécavin C., Tchitchek N., Mintsa-Eya C., Lesne A., Benecke A. Improving the efficiency of multidimensional scaling in the analysis of high-dimensional data using singular value decomposition. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:1413-1421.
26. Noth S., Brysbaert G., Benecke A. Normalization using weighted negative second order exponential error functions (NeONORM) provides robustness against asymmetries in comparative transcriptome profiles and avoids false calls. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2006, 4:90-109.