A clinical decision support needs assessment of community-based physicians

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 18, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 28-35

  Richardson, Joshua E ^a,b   Ash, Joan S ^b  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; RURAL AREA; URBAN AREA; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNITY MEDICINE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MOTIVATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNITY MEDICINE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIANS; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84865307128     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000119     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1477-9.
2. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-4.
3. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art. 2009. http://healthit.ahrq.gov/images/jun09cdsreview/09_0069_ef.html.
4. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory careda national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50-60.
5. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, et al. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):CD001096.
6. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-38.
7. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742-52.
8. Steele AW, Eisert S, Witter J, et al. The effect of automated alerts on provider ordering behavior in an outpatient setting. PLoS Med 2005;2:e255.
9. Weingart SN, Massagli M, Cyrulik A, et al. Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:571-8.
10. Weingart SN, Simchowitz B, Shiman L, et al. Clinicians' assessments of electronic medication safety alerts in ambulatory care. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1627-32.
11. Tamblyn R, Huang A, Taylor L, et al. A randomized trial of the effectiveness of ondemand versus computer-triggered drug decision support in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:430-8.
12. van Wyk JT, van Wijk MA, Sturkenboom MC, et al. Electronic alerts versus ondemand decision support to improve dyslipidemia treatment: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2008;117:371-8.
13. Woods DM, Thomas EJ, Holl JL, et al. Ambulatory care adverse events and preventable adverse events leading to a hospital admission. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:127-31.
14. Lo HG, Matheny ME, Seger DL, et al. Impact of non-interruptive medication laboratory monitoring alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:66-71.
15. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Seger AC, et al. Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20:837-41.
16. Berner ES, ed. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. c2007. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
17. Isaac T, Weissman JS, Davis RB, et al. Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:305-11.
18. Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, et al. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:5-11.
19. Krall MA. Assessments of Outpatient Electronic Medical Record Alert and Reminder Usability and Usefulness Requirements: A Qualitative Stud, 2002. http://drl.ohsu.edu/cgi-bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT/etd&CISOPTR603&filename324.pdf (accessed 1 Mar 2010).
20. Krall MA, Sittig DF. Clinician's assessments of outpatient electronic medical record alert and reminder usability and usefulness requirements. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:400-4.
21. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:523-30.
22. Stead W, National Research Council (US). Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2009.
23. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patientcentered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:614-21.
24. Armijo D, McDonnell C, Werner K. Electronic Health Record Usability: Interface Design Considerations. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009. http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/.0./09(10)-0091-2-EF.pdf.
25. Richardson JE, Ash JS, Sittig DF, et al. Multiple perspectives on the meaning of clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010:1427-31.
26. Armijo D, McDonnell C, Werner K. Electronic Health Record Usability: Evaluation and Use Case Framework. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009. http://healthit.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/.0./09(10)-0091-1-EF.pdf.
27. Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, et al. Expanding the concept of medical information: an observational study of physicians' information needs. Comput Biomed Res 1992;25:181-200.
28. Teach RL, Shortliffe EH. An analysis of physician attitudes regarding computerbased clinical consultation systems. Comput Biomed Res 1981;14:542-58.
29. McGowan JJ, Richwine M. Electronic information access in support of clinical decision making: a comparative study of the impact on rural health care outcomes. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:565-9.
30. Mihailidis A, Krones L, Boger J. Assistive computing devices: a pilot study to explore nurses' preferences and needs. Comput Inform Nurs 2006;24:328-36.
31. Carlson BA, Neal D, Magwood G, et al. A community-based participatory health information needs assessment to help eliminate diabetes information disparities. Health Promot Pract 2006;7(3 Suppl):213S-22S.
32. Lloyd SC. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Ambulatory Care. 1984. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid2578687.
33. Kukafka R, Millery M, Chan C. Needs assessment for the design of an informatics tool for HIV counselors. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:1017.
34. Morris M, Lundell J, Dishman E. Catalyzing social interaction with ubiquitous computing: a needs assessment of elders coping with cognitive decline. In: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria: ACM, 2004:1151-4.
35. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M, et al. Bundles: meeting clinical information needs. Bull Med Libr Assoc 2001;89:294-6.
36. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann Intern Med 1985;103:596-9.
37. Currie LM, Graham M, Allen M, et al. Clinical information needs in context: an observational study of clinicians while using a clinical information system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:190-4.
38. Graham MJ, Currie LM, Allen M, et al. Characterizing information needs and cognitive processes during CIS use. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:852.
39. Wager KA, Lee FW, White AW, et al. Impact of an electronic medical record system on community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract 2000;13:338-48.
40. Yoon-Flannery K, Zandieh SO, Kuperman GJ, et al. A qualitative analysis of an electronic health record (EHR) implementation in an academic ambulatory setting. Inform Prim Care 2008;16:277-84.
41. Perley CM, Gentry CA, Fleming AS, et al. Conducting a user-centered information needs assessment: the Via Christi Libraries' experience. J Med Libr Assoc 2007;95:173-81, e54-5.
42. Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Assessing medical residents' usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:25-34.
43. Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs' perspectives. Int J Med Inform 2004;73:357-62.
44. Wilson A, Duszynski A, Turnbull D, et al. Investigating patients' and general practitioners' views of computerised decision support software for the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk. Inform Prim Care 2007;15:33-44.
45. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of patient information: a multi-method study of GP's use of electronic patient records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:12.
46. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Expectations for the next generation of electronic patient records in primary care: a triangulated study. Inform Prim Care 2008;16:21-8.
47. Hoff T. Practice Under Pressure: Primary Care Physicians and their Medicine in the Twenty-First Century. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2010.
48. Weiner M, Callahan CM, Tierney WM, et al. Using information technology to improve the health care of older adults. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:430-6.
49. Cooper A. About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design. New York; Chichester: Wiley, 2003.
50. Rich E. User modeling via stereotypes. In: Readings in Intelligent User Interfaces. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1998:329-42.
51. Cooper A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. Pearson Higher Education, 2004.
52. Dreyfuss H. Designing for People. New York: Allworth Press, 2003.
53. Beyer H. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998.
54. Mayhew DJ. Requirements specifications within the usability engineering lifecycle. In: Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009:23-53.
55. Kaplan B, Maxwell J. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. Evaluating the Organizational Impact of Healthcare Information Systems. 2005:30-55.
56. Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, et al. The multitasking clinician: decisionmaking and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform 2007;76:801-11.
57. Richardson JE, Ash JS. The effects of hands-free communication device systems: communication changes in hospital organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:91-8.
58. Glaser B, Strauss A. Grounded Theory: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: de Gruyter, 1967.
59. Royse D. Program Evaluation: An Introduction. 5th edn. Australia; Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.
60. Cherry DK, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary. Adv Data 2007:1-39.
61. NAMCS/NHAMCS. Physician Office Visit Data. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/physician_office_visits.htm (accessed 28 Dec 2010).
62. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3):MR000008.
63. Tufte E. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd edn. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 2001.
64. Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The patient-centered medical home: will it stand the test of health reform? JAMA 2009;301:2038-40.
65. National Committee on Quality Assurance. NCQA's Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011. 2011. https://inetshop01.pub.ncqa.org/publications/product.asp?dept_id2&pf_id30004-301-11.
66. McDaniel S. Family-oriented primary care. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2005.