Investigating patients' and general practitioners' views of computerised decision support software for the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-44

  Wilson, Anne ^a   Duszynski, André ^a   Turnbull, Deborah ^a   Beilby, Justin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular; Decision aid; Electronic decision support software; Evaluation; Medical informatics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSULTATION; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELEPHONE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TIME;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; RISK FACTORS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34447621945     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v15i1.642     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. National Electronic Decision Support Task Force. Electronic Decision Support for Australia's Health Sector. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing; 2003.
2. O'Connor A, Stavey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2004.
3. Carroll C, Marsden P, Soden P, Naylor E, New J and Dornan T. Involving users in the design and usability evaluation of a clinical decision support system. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2002;69: 123-35.
4. Bindels R, Hasman A, Derickx M, van Wersch JWJ and Winkens RAG. User satisfaction with a real-time automated feedback system for general practitioners: a quantitative and qualitative study. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 2003;15:501-8.
5. Murff HJ, Gandhi TK, Karson AK et al. Primary care physician attitudes concerning follow-up of abnormal test results and ambulatory decision support systems. International Journal of Medical Informarics 2003;71: 137-49.
6. Ahearn M and Kerr S. General practitioners' perceptions of the pharmaceutical decision-support tools in their prescribing software. Medical Journal of Australia 2003; 179:34-7.
7. Wyatt J. Quantitative evaluation of clinical software, exemplified by decision support systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1997;47:165-73.
8. Pagliari C, Clark D, Hunter K et al. DARTS 2000 online diabetes management system: formative evaluation in clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2003;9:391-400.
9. Johnston JM, Leung GM, Tin KYK, Ho L-M, Lam W and Fielding R. Evaluation of a handheld clinical decision support tool for evidence-based learning and practice in medical undergraduates. Medical Education 2004;38: 628-37.
10. Liaw ST, Sulaiman N, Pearce C et al. Falls prevention within the Australian general practice data model: methodology, information model, and terminology issues. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2003;10:425-32.
11. Liaw ST and Schattner P. Electronic decision support in general practice. What's the hold-up? Australian Family Physician 2003;32:941-4.
12. O'Neill ES, Dluhy NM, Fortier PJ and Michel HE. Knowledge acquisition, synthesis, and validation: a model for decision support systems. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2004;47:134-42.
13. Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, van der Hoorn S, Murray C, and the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. The Lancet 2002;360:1347-60.
14. Hunter D. Disease management: has it a future? British Medical Journal 2000;320:530.
15. Epstein R and Sherwood L. From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed. Annals of Internal Medicine 1996;124:832-42.
16. Bauman A, Fardy H and Harris P. Getting it right: why bother with patient-centred care? Medical Journal of Australia 2003;179:253-6.
17. Boulware LE, Daumit GL, Frick KD, Minkovitz CS, Lawrence RS and Powe NR. An evidence-based review of patient-centered behavioral interventions for hypertension. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2001; 21:221-32.
18. Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Havelsrud K, Treweek S, Kristoffersen DT and Bjorndal A. Rational prescribing in primary care (RaPP): a cluster randomized trial of a tailored intervention. PLoS Medicine 2006;3:e134.
19. National Prescribing Service (NPS). New Zealand Cardiovascular Risk Calculator. New South Wales: National Prescribing Service; 2004.
20. National Heart Foundation. Hypertension Management Guide for Doctors. National Heart Foundation; 2004. www.heartfoundation.com.au/ downloads/hypertension_management_guide2004.pdf
21. Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO-ISH. WHO-ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension. Journal of Hypertension 1999; 17:151-83.
22. American National Standards Institute Inc. American National Standard for Information Technology: common industry format for usability test reports. New York: American National Standards Institute Inc.; 2001.
23. Beanland C, Schneider Z, LoBiondo-Wood G and Haber J. Nursing Research: methods, critical appraisal and utilization. 1st Australian edn. Artarmon: Mosby Publishers Australia Pty Ltd; 1999.
24. Liu J, Wyatt J and Altman D. Decision tools in health care: focus on the problem, not the solution. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2006;6:4.