The effects of hands-free communication device systems: Communication changes in hospital organizations

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 91-98

  Richardson, Joshua E ^a   Ash, Joan S ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HANDS FREE COMMUNICATION DEVICE SYSTEM; HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; IN SERVICE TRAINING; INSTRUMENTATION; LOCAL AREA NETWORK; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION; HOSPITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; HOSPITALS, COMMUNITY; INSERVICE TRAINING; LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; OREGON; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; TELEPHONE;

EID: 77950499362     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3307     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviours in a hospital setting: an observational study. BMJ 1998;316:673-6.
2. Welton JM, Decker M, Adam J, et al. How far do nurses walk? Medsurg Nurs 2006;15:213-16.
3. Coiera E, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, et al. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust 2002;177:333-5.
4. Alvarez G, Coiera E. Interdisciplinary communication: an uncharted source of medical error? J Crit Care 2006;21:236-42; discussion 242.
5. Alvarez G, Coiera E. Interruptive communication patterns in the intensive care unit ward round. Int J Med Inform 2005;74:791-6.
6. Taylor D, Coakley A, Reardon G, et al. An analysis of inpatient nursing communications needs. Medinfo 2004;11(Part 2):1393-7.
7. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:277-86.
8. Coiera E. Clinical communication: a new informatics paradigm. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:17-21.
9. Jacques PS, France DJ, Pilla M, et al. Evaluation of a hands-free wireless communication device in the perioperative environment. Telemed J E Health 2006;12:42-9.
10. Breslin S, Greskovich W, Turisco F. Wireless technology improves nursing workflow and communications. Comput Inform Nurs 2004;22:275-81.
11. Kuruzovich J, Angst CM, Faraj S, et al. Wireless communication role in patient response time: a study of vocera integration with a nurse call system. Comput Inform Nurs 2008;26:159-66.
12. Friedman CP, Wyatt J. Evaluation methods in medical informatics. New York: Springer, 2006.
13. Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:104-12.
14. Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, et al. Multiple perspectives on physician order entry. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:27-31.
15. Reddy MC, Pratt W, McDonald DW, et al. Challenges to physicians' use of a wireless alert pager. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:544-8.
16. Reddy MC, McDonald DW, Pratt W, et al. Technology, work, and information flows: lessons from the implementation of a wireless alert pager system. J Biomed Inform 2005;38:229-38.
17. Mates J, Branstetter BF, Morgan MB, et al. 'Wet Reads' in the age of PACS: technical and workflow considerations for a preliminary report system. J Digit Imaging 2007;20:296-306.
18. Sneiderman CA, Ackerman MJ. Cellular radio telecommunication for health care: benefits and risks. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:479-81.
19. Fowkes W, Christenson D, McKay D. Analysis of the use of the telephone in the management of patients in skilled nursing facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:67-70.
20. Olson LL. Commentary on introducing a two-way wireless communication system. [original article by Minnick A et al appears in Nurs Manage 1994;25(7):42e7]. AONE's Leadership Prospectives 1995;3:17.
21. Bardram JE. I love the systemdI just don't use it! Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work: the integration challenge. Phoenix, Arizona, USA: ACM Press, 1997.
22. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applicationsdsome alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001;64:39-56.
23. Kaufman D, Roberts WD, Merrill J, et al. Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nurs Res 2006;55 (Suppl 2):S37-42.
24. Ash J, Sittig DF, Campbell EM, et al. Some unintended consequences of clinical decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007 Oct 11:26-30.
25. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1967.
26. Linstone HA. Decision making for technology executives: using multiple perspectives to improve performance. Boston, MA: Artech House, 1999.
27. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 1984.
28. Richardson JE, Ash J. The effects of hands free communication devices on clinical communication: balancing communication access needs with user control. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:621-5.
29. Reddy M, Spence PR. Finding answers: information needs of a multidisciplinary patient care team in an emergency department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:649-53.
30. Reddy MC, Pratt W, Dourish P, et al. Asking questions: information needs in a surgical intensive care unit. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:647-51.
31. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn. Thosand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.