Expectations for the next generation of electronic patient records in primary care: A triangulated study

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 21-28

  Christensen, Tom ^a   Grimsmo, Anders ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Decision support systems; Personal health records; Problem oriented medical records

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPERIENCE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 45349102515     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v16i1.671     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nilsen JF and Fosse S. A computerized medical record system for primary health care. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 1982;102:1285-8.
2. Valnes KN and Aarseth HP. A user evaluation of software programs in family practice. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 1995;115:230-3.
3. Delpierre C, Cuzin L, Fillaux J, Alvarez M, Massip P and Lang T. A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach? International Journal for Quality Health Care 2004;16:407-16.
4. Loomis G, Ries J, Saywell JR and Thakker N. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? Journal of Family Practice 2002;51: 636-41.
5. Kounalakis D, Lionis C, Okkes I and Lamberts H. Developing an appropriate EPR system for the Greek primary care setting. Journal of Medical Systems 2003; 27:239-46.
6. Christensen T and Grimsmo A. Development of functional requirements for electronic health communication: preliminary results from the ELIN project. Informatics in Primary Care 2005;13:203-8.
7. Meijer S, Hoopen A, van der Maas A and Kamphuis H. Pain clinic EPR: requirements determination and configuration. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002;93:111-18.
8. Dumont R, van der Loo R, van Merode F and Tange H. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record. Medinfo 1998;9:64-9.
9. Helles R and Ruland C. Developing a module for nursing documentation integrated in the electronic patient record. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2001;10:799-805.
10. Christensen T and Grimsmo A. In contrast to hospitals, primary care electronic patient record systems excel in supporting physicians' clinical work. Submitted for publication. 2007.
11. Weed LJ. The problem oriented record as a basic tool in medical education, patient care and clinical research. Annals of Clinical Research 1971;3:131-4.
12. Salmon P, Rappaport A, Bainbridge M, Hayes G and Williams J. Taking the problem oriented medical record forward. Proceedings: a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Fall Symposium 1996: 463-7.
13. Lundsgaarde HP. Human Problems in Computerized Medicine. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1981.
14. Branger PJ, van der Wouden JC, Schudel BR et al. Electronic communication between providers of primary and secondary care. British Medical Journal 1992;305: 1068-70.
15. Johansen I, Henriksen G, Demkjaer K, Jensen HB and Jorgensen L. Quality assurance and certification of health IT-systems communicating data in primary and secondary health sector. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2003;95:601-5.
16. Dee C and Blazek R. Information needs of the rural physician: a descriptive study. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1993;81:259-64.
17. Johannessen T. The Norwegian Electronic Medical Handbook. 2008. Available from: www.legehandboka.no
18. Bassoe CF and Soerli W. A problem-oriented computerized medical record worked, whereas a chronological did not. In: Hansen R, Solheim BG, O'Moore RR and Roger FH (eds) Proceedings: Medical Informatics Europe '88; 1988: lecture notes in medical informatics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988: 190-4.
19. Bayegan E and Nytr O. A problem-oriented, knowledge-based patient record system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2002; 90:272-6.
20. Linnarsson R and Nordgren K. A shared computer-based problem-oriented patient record for the primary care team. Medinfo 1995;8:1663.
21. Bossen C. Evaluation of a computerized problem-oriented medical record in a hospital department: does it support daily clinical practice? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:592-600.
22. Bassoe CF. Data hygiene. Data security, prevention of wrong or useless information and high quality of communication. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 1995;115(2):252-5.
23. Grimsmo A. Electronic medical handbooks - are they suitable for implementation of guidelines in health care? Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 2006;126:2377-9.
24. Balas EA, Austin SM, Mitchell JA, Ewigman BG, Bopp KD and Brown GD. The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. Archives of Family Medicine 1996; 5:271.
25. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA and Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. British Medical Journal 2005; 330:765.
26. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 2005; 293:1223-38.
27. Bergus GR, Sinift SD, Randall CS and Rosenthal DM. Use of an email curbside consultation service by family physicians. Journal of Family Practice 1998;47:357-60.
28. Jadad AR and Delamothe T. What next for electronic communication and health care? British Medical Journal 2004;328:1143-4.
29. van der Kam WJ, Moorman PW and Koppejan-Mulder MJ. Effects of electronic communication in general practice. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2000;60:59-70.
30. Safran C, Jones PC, Rind D, Bush B, Cytryn KN and Patel VL. Electronic communication and collaboration in a health care practice. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1998;12:137-51.
31. Keating NL, Zaslavsky AM and Ayanian JZ. Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. Journal of the American Medical Association 1998;280: 900-4.
32. Pagliari C, Detmer D and Singleton P. Potential of electronic personal health records. British Medical Journal 2007;335:330.
33. Wifstad A. Medicine based on information technology-effect on autonomy and vulnerability. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 2002;122:720-2.
34. Mandl KD, Szolovits P and Kohane IS. Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. British Medical Journal 2001;322:283-7.
35. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R and Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005 (4)CD004274.
36. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM and Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:121-6.
37. Kim MI and Johnson KB. Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002;9:171.
38. Mays N and Pope C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal 1995;311: 109-12.
39. Lincoln YS. Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry 1995;1: 275.
40. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet 2001;358:483-8.
41. Christensen T and Grimsmo A. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of patient information; a multi-method study of GP's use of electronic patient records. Submitted for publication. 2008.