Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 450-459

  Kamburoǧlu, Kivanç ^a   Kolsuz, E ^a   Murat, S ^a   Yuksel S ^a   Ozen T ^b  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bitewing radiography; Dental caries; Panoramic radiography; Radiography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL CARIES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84865238792     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30526171     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kidd EA, Pitts NB. A reappraisal of the value of the bite-wing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior proximal caries. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 195-200.
2. Svenson B, Gröndahl HG, Petersson A, Olving A. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds. Swed Dent J 1985; 9: 37-43.
3. Eli I, Weiss EI, Tzohar A, Littner MM, Gelernter I, Kaffe I. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions. J Dent 1996; 24: 379-383. (Pubitemid 126372802)
4. Weiss EI, Tzohar A, Kaffe I, Littner MM, Gelernter I, Eli I. Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 2. Evaluation of the size of approximal lesions and need for treatment. J Dent 1996; 24: 385-388. (Pubitemid 126372803)
5. Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Uçok O, Yü ksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 501-511.
6. Newman B, Seow WK, Kazoullis S, Ford D, Holcombe T. Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography. Aust Dent J 2009; 54: 23-30.
7. Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J Dent Res 2004; 83: Spec No C: C72-75. (Pubitemid 44131379)
8. Noujeim M, Prihoda T, McDavid WD, Ogawa K, Seki K, Okano T, Sue T, Langlais RP. Pre-clinical evaluation of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on tomosynthesis method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 42-46.
9. Ogawa K, Langlais RP, McDavid WD, Noujeim M, Seki K, Okano T, Yamakawa T, Sue T. Development of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on a tomosynthesis method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 47-53.
10. Flint DJ, Paunovich E, Moore WS, Wofford DT, Hermesch CB. A diagnostic comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Med Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 731-735. (Pubitemid 128641978)
11. Akkaya N, Kansu O, Kansu H, Cagirankaya LB, Arslan U. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 170-174. (Pubitemid 43724558)
12. Hintze H, Wenzel A. A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults. Caries Res 1999; 33: 380-386.
13. Akarslan ZZ, Akdeveliog̈lu M, Güngö r K, Erten H. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 458-463.
14. Eickholz P, Kolb I, Lenhard M, Hassfeld S, Staehle H. Digital radiography of interproximal caries: Effect of different filters. Caries Res 1999; 33: 234-241.
15. Schulze RK, Grimm S, Schulze D, Voss K, Keller HP, Wedel M. Diagnostic yield of ink-jet prints from digital radiographs for the assessment of approximal carious lesions: ROC-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2011; 79: 277-282.
16. Benediktsdó ttir IS, Wenzel A. Accuracy of digital panoramic images displayed on monitor, glossy paper, and film for assessment of mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 98: 217-222. (Pubitemid 39078027)
17. Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Pauwels H, Jacobs R. Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media. Clinical Oral Investigations 2004; 8: 25-29.
18. Haiter-Neto F, Casanova MS, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Taskspecific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 116-121.
19. Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12: 217-223.
20. Parrott LA, Ng SY. A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: A retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 102-109.
21. Young SM, Lee JT, Hodges RJ, Chang TL, Elashoff DA, White SC. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 445-451.