Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 83, Issue SPEC. ISS. C, 2004, Pages

  Wenzel, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Dental caries; Digital radiography

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

CLINICAL TRIALS; DENTAL CARIES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 4143081769     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301S14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (53)

1. Bahrami G, Hagstrom C, Wenzel A (2003). Bitewing examination with four digital receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:317-321.
2. Firestone AR, Sema D, Heaven TJ, Weems RA (1998). The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images. Caries Res 32:127-134.
3. Gröndahl H-G (1994). The value of the radiologic examination in caries diagnosis. In: Textbook of clinical cariology. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O, editors. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, pp. 376-382.
4. Halse A, Espelid I, Tveit AB, White SC (1994). Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77:177-182.
5. Heaven TJ, Firestone AR, Feagin FF (1992). Computer-based image analysis of natural approximal caries on radiographic films. J Dent Res 71:846-849.
6. Hintze H (1993). Screening with conventional and digital bite-wing radiography compared to clinical examination alone for caries detection in low-risk children. Caries Res 23:499-504.
7. Hintze H, Wenzel A (1994). Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 23:19-23.
8. Hintze H, Wenzel A (1996). Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:115-118.
9. Hintze H, Wenzel A (1999). A two-film versus a four-film bite-wing examination for caries diagnosis in adults. Caries Res 33:380-386.
10. Hintze H, Wenzel A (2002). Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:44-49.
11. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C (1994). In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and Visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Caries Res 28:363-367.
12. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B (1998). Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bitewing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces. Caries Res 32:204-209.
13. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B (1999). Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5-year longitudinal study in young adults. Caries Res 33:415-422.
14. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M (2002). Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:170-175.
15. Jensen ØE, Handelman SL, Iker HP (1987). Use and quality of bitewing films in private dental offices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 63:249-253.
16. Kaffe I, Gordon M, Laufer B, Littner MM (1984). Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography. Oral Surg 57:567-571.
17. Kidd EAM, Pitts NB (1990). A re-appraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Br Dent J 169:195-200.
18. Mauriello SM, Overman VP, Platin ER (1995). Radiographic imaging for the dental team. Philadelphia: Lippincott, pp. 131-132, 161-169.
19. Nielsen L-L, Hoernoe M, Wenzel A (1996). Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study. Int J Paediat Dent 6:167-172.
20. Pearce EIF, Coote GE, Larsen MJ (1995). The distribution of fluoride in carious human enamel. J Dent Res 74:1775-1782.
21. Pitts NB (1984a). Film-holding, beam-aiming and collimating devices as an aid to standardization in intra-oral radiography: a review. J Dent 12:36-46.
22. Pitts NB (1984b). Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis of bitewing radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58:358-366.
23. Pitts NB (1986). Approximal radiolucencies in partially overlapped enamel: the need for quantitation and a preliminary assessment of a computer-aided image analysis method. Quintessence Int 17:229-236.
24. Pitts NB (1996). The use of bitewing radiographs in the management of dental caries: scientific and practical considerations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:5-16.
25. Pitts NB, Kidd EAM (1992). Some of the factors to be considered in the prescription and timing of bitewing radiography in the diagnosis and management of dental caries. J Dent 20:74-84.
26. Pitts NB, Longbottom C (1987). Temporary tooth separation with special references to the diagnosis and preventive management of equivocal approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int 18:563-573.
27. Pitts NB, Rimmer PA (1992). An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 26:146-152.
28. Raper HR (1925). Practical clinical preventive dentistry based upon periodic Roentgen-ray examinations. J Am Dent Assoc Sept:1084-1100.
29. Ratledge DK, Kidd EAM, Beighton D (2001). A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Part 1: The relationship between cavitation, radiographic lesion depth, the site specific gingival index and the level of infection of the dentine. Caries Res 35:3-7.
30. Ricketts D, Kidd E, Weerheijm K, de Soet H (1997). Hidden caries: what is it? Does it exist? Does it matter? Int Dent J 47:259-265.
31. Rossmann K (1969). Image quality. Radiol Clin North Am 7:419-433.
32. Verdonschot EH, Angmar-Månsson B, ten Bosch JJ, Deery CH, Huysmans MCDNJM, Pitts NB, et al. (1999). Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality care. Caries Res 33:32-40.
33. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, van Ginkel FC, van der Stell PF (1998). An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:97-101.
34. Webber RL, Horton DA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB (1997). Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT™). Theory and application for three-dimensional dento-alveolar imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:53-62.
35. Wenzel A (1991). Influence of computerized information technologies on image quality in dental radiographs. Danish Dent J 95:527-559.
36. Wenzel A (1995). Current trends in radiographic caries imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80:527-539.
37. Wenzel A (1998). Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27:3-11.
38. Wenzel A (1999). Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent 4:269-290.
39. Wenzel A (2000). Digital imaging for dental caries. Dent Clinic North Am 44:319-338.
40. Wenzel A (2001). Computer-automated caries detection in digital bitewings: consistency of a program and its influence on observer agreement. Caries Res 35:12-20.
41. Wenzel A, Andersen L (1994). A quantitative analysis of subtraction images based on bite-wing radiographs for simulated victim identification in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 12:1-5.
42. Wenzel A, Fejerskov O (1992). Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars. Caries Res 26:188-194.
43. Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E (2000). An interview study with Danish dentists who work with direct digital radiography (in Danish with an English summary). Tandlaegebladet 3:130-136.
44. Wenzel A, Gröndahl H-G (1995). Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 45:27-34.
45. Wenzel A, Halse A (1992). Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74:824-828.
46. Wenzel A, Moystad A (2001a). Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radial 30:197-202.
47. Wenzel A, Moystad A (2001b). Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30:203-208.
48. Wenzel A, Pitts N, Verdonschot EM, Kalsbeek H (1993). Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis. J Dent 21:131-140.
49. Wenzel A, Frandsen EG, Hintze H (1999). Patient discomfort and cross-infection control in bitewing examination with a storage phosphor plate and a CCD-based sensor. J Dent 27:243-246.
50. Wenzel A, Anthonisen PN, Juul MB (2000). Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography. Caries Res 34:214-218.
51. Wenzel A, Hintze H, Kold LM, Kold S (2002). Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Eur J Oral Sci 110:1-5.
52. White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors (2000). Oral radiology-principles and interpretation. 4th rev. ed. St. Louis: Mosby, pp. 122-157.
53. White SC, Yoon DC (1997). Comparative performance of digital and conventional images for detecting proximal surface caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 26:32-38.