Estimation of 3D shape, internal density and mechanics of proximal femur by combining bone mineral density images with shape and density templates

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 791-800

  Väänänen, Sami P ^a,b   Jurvelin, Jukka S ^a   Isaksson, Hanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Bone strength; Finite element; Proximal femur; Shape estimation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ERRORS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MINERALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

3-D SHAPE; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS; DENSITY IMAGES; DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY; FINITE ELEMENT; FRACTURE RISKS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; SHAPE ESTIMATION;

BONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84865197765     PISSN: 16177959     EISSN: 16177940     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-011-0352-9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M et al (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34: 859-871 (Pubitemid 32530054)
2. Bookstein F (1989) Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 11:567-585
3. Cody D, Gross G, Hou FJ et al (1999) Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32:1013-1020 (Pubitemid 29356040)
4. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ (2001) Active appearance models. IEEE PAM 23:681-685 (Pubitemid 32585279)
5. Dragomir-Daescu D, Op Den Buijs J, McEligot S et al (2011) Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip. Ann Biomed Eng. 39:742-755
6. Edwards W, Gillette J, Thomas J et al (2008) Internal femoral forces and moments during running: implications for stress fracture development. Clin Biomech 23:1269-1278
7. Fang Q, Boas DA (2009) Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. In: International symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. IEEE, Boston
8. Filippi S, Motyl B, Bandera C (2007) Analysis of existing methods for 3D modelling of femurs starting from two orthogonal images and development of a script for a commercial software package. Comput Meth Prog Biol 89:76-82 (Pubitemid 50018974)
9. Galibarov PE, Prendergast PJ, Lennon AB (2010) A method to reconstruct patient-specific proximal femur surface models from planar pre-operative radiographs. Med Eng Phys 32:1180-1188
10. Gower J (1975) Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51
11. Humbert L,Whitmarsh T, De Craene M et al (2010) 3D reconstruction of both shape and bone mineral density distribution of the femur fromDXAimages. Biomedical imaging: from nano tomacro, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on April 14-17, pp 456-459
12. Keyak J, Rossi S, Jones K et al (1998) Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 31: 125-133 (Pubitemid 28195808)
13. Keyak J, Rossi S, Jones K et al (2001) Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models.Med Eng Phys 23:657-664 (Pubitemid 34072903)
14. Keyak J, Falkinstein Y (2003) Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25:781-787 (Pubitemid 39089844)
15. Kolta S, Le Bras A, Mitton D et al (2005) Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): A method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device. Osteoporos Int 16:969-976 (Pubitemid 41127107)
16. Kurazume R, Nakamura K, Okada T et al (2009) 3D reconstruction of a femoral shape using a parametricmodel and two 2Dfluoroscopic images. Comput Vis Image Und 113:202-211
17. Langton C, Pisharody S, Keyak J (2009a) Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 31:668-672
18. Langton C, Pisharody S, Keyak J (2009b) Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image. Osteoporos Int 20:455-461
19. Laporte S, Skalli W, De Guise J et al (2003) A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: Application to the distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6:1-6
20. Lu PJ, Oki H, Frey CA et al (2010) Orders-of-magnitude performance increases in GPU-Accelerated correlation of images from the International Space Station. J Real-Time Image Proc 5:179-193
21. Morgan E, Bayraktar H, Keaveny T (2003) Trabecular bone modulus- density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36: 897-904 (Pubitemid 36566627)
22. Pasco J, Seeman E, Henry M et al (2006) The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1404-1409 (Pubitemid 44127328)
23. Schileo E, Taddei F, Malandrino A et al (2007) Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. J Biomech 40:2982-2989 (Pubitemid 47385813)
24. Väänänen SP, IsakssonH, Julkunen P et al (2011) Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10:529-538
25. Wirtz D, Pandorf T, Portheine F et al (2003) Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. J Biomech 36:289-293 (Pubitemid 36110593)