A method to reconstruct patient-specific proximal femur surface models from planar pre-operative radiographs

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1180-1188

  Galibarov, P E ^a   Prendergast, P J ^a   Lennon, A B ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Finite element analysis; Image processing; Patient specific

Indexed keywords

3D DATA; 3D MODELS; 3D RECONSTRUCTION; 3D SURFACE MODELS; ACTIVE CONTOURS; AUTOMATED METHODS; CONTOUR EXTRACTION; CT SCAN; ERROR LEVELS; ERROR VALUES; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GENERIC MODELS; GEOMETRIC PRECISION; MECHANICAL SIMULATIONS; MEDICAL IMAGES; PATIENT-SPECIFIC; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGES; RECONSTRUCTION ACCURACY; STRAIN FIELDS; SURFACE MODELS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTION;

AUTOMATION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; X RAY;

FEMUR; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAYS;

EID: 78449231927     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. McCollough C.H., Primak A.N., Braun N., Kofler J., Yu L., Christner J. Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2009, 47(1):27-40.
2. Krüger J., Westermann R. Acceleration techniques for GPU-based volume rendering. VIS 2003 2003, 287-292. IEEE, Seattle Washington, USA, ISBN: 0-7803-8120-3, doi:10.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250384. G. Tork, J.J. van Wijk, R. Moorhead (Eds.).
3. Keyak J.H., Meagher J.M., Skinner H.B., Mote C.D. Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1990, 12(5):389-397.
4. Lorensen W.E., Cline H.E. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics 1987, 21(4).
5. Hounsfield G.N. Nobel lecture, 8 December 1979. Computed medical imaging. Journal of Radiology 1980, 61(6-7):459-468.
6. Couteau B., Hobatho M.-C., Darmana R., Brignola J.-C., Arlaud J.-Y. Finite element modelling of the vibrational behaviour of the human femur using CT-based individualized geometrical and material properties. Journal of Biomechanics 1998, 31(4):383-386.
7. Yosibash Z., Trabelsi N., Milgrom C. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40(16):3688-3699.
8. Viceconti M., Davinelli M., Taddei F., Cappello A. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37(10):1597-1605.
9. Viceconti M., Zannoni C., Testi D., Cappello A. CT data sets surface extraction for biomechanical modeling of long bones. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 1999, 59(3):159-166.
10. Barratt D.C., Chan C.S.K., Edwards P.J., Penney G.P., Slomczykowski M., Carter T.J., et al. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 12(3):358-374.
11. Rajamani K.T., Styner M.A., Talib H., Zheng G., Nolte L.P., Ballester M.A.G. Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data. Medical Image Analysis 2007, 11(2):99-109.
12. Talib H., Rajamani K., Kowal J., Nolte L.P., Styner M., Ballester M.A.G. A comparison study assessing the feasibility of ultrasound-initialized deformable bone models. Computer Aided Surgery 2005, 10(5-6):293-299.
13. Heimann T., Meinzer H.-P. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Medical Image Analysis 2009, 13(4):543-563.
14. Fleute M., Lavallee S., Julliard R. Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Medical Image Analysis 1999, 3(3):209-222.
15. Shim V.B., Pitto R.P., Streicher R.M., Hunter P.J., Anderson I.A. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40(1):26-35.
16. Bras A.L., Laporte S., Bousson V., Mitton D., Guise J.A.D., Laredo J.D., et al. Personalised 3D reconstruction of proximal femur from low-dose digital biplanar radiographs. International Congress Series 2003, 1256:214-219.
17. Zanetti E.M., Crupi V., Bignardi C., Calderale P.M. Radiograph-based femur morphing method. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2005, 43(2):181-188.
18. Zheng G. Statistically deformable 2D/3D registration for accurate determination of post-operative cup orientation from single standard X-ray radiograph. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2009, 12(Pt 1):820-827.
19. Zheng G., Gollmer S., Schumann S., Dong X., Feilkas T., Ballester M.A.G. A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images. Medical Image Analysis 2009, 13(6):883-899.
20. Zheng G.Y. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP X-ray radiograph. Medical Physics 2010, 37(4):1424-1439.
21. Langton C.M, Pisharody S., Keyak J.H. Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. Medical Engineering & Physics 2009, 31(6):668-672.
22. Langton C.M., Pisharody S., Keyak J.H. Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image. Osteoporosis International 2009, 20(3):455-461.
23. Bredbenner TL, Nicolella DP. Reconstructing High Fidelity 3D Finite Element Models of a Human Proximal Femur from 2D DXA Data. In: Transactions of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. The Orthopaedic Research Society; 2008. p. Poster No. 911.
24. Lennon A.B., Britton J.R., MacNiocaill R.F., Byrne D.P., Kenny P.J., Prendergast P.J. Predicting revision risk for aseptic loosening of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty in individual patients-a finite element study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2007, 25(6):779-788.
25. Hou Z., Han C. Force field analysis snake: an improved parametric active contour model. Pattern Recognition Letters 2005, 26(5):513-526.
26. Caselles V., Kimmel R., Sapiro G. Geometric active contours for image segmentation 2005, 613-627. Academic Press, Burlington. A. Bovik (Ed.).
27. Lim J.S. Two-dimensional signal and image processing 1990, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
28. Noble P.C., Alexander J.W., Lindahl L.J., Yew D.T., Granberry W.M., Tullos H.S. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1988, (235):148-165.
29. Sugano N., Noble P.C., Kamaric E. Predicting the position of the femoral head center. The Journal of Arthroplasty 1999, 14(1):102-107.
30. Leavers V.F. Which Hough transform?. CVGIP: Image Understanding 1993, 58(2):250-264.
31. Viceconti M., Casali M., Massari B., Cristofolini L., Bassini S., Toni A. The 'Standardized femur program' proposal for a reference geometry to be used for the creation of finite element models of the femur. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29(9):1241-11241.
32. Cheung G., Zalzal P., Bhandari M., Spelt J.K., Papini M. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Medical Engineering & Physics 2004, 26(2):93-108.
33. Van Sint Jan S. The VAKHUM-project: virtual animation of the kinematics of the human. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2005, 6(3):277-1277.
34. Ackerman M.J. The Visible Human Project. The Journal of biocommunication 1991, 18(2):14-114.
35. Viceconti M., Bellingeri L., Cristofolini L., Toni A. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. Medical Engineering & Physics 1998, 20(1):1-10.
36. Ramos A., Simões J.A. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur. Medical Engineering & Physics 2006, 28(9):916-924.
37. Messmer P., Long G., Suhm N., Regazzoni P., Jacob A.L. Volumetric model determination of the Tibia based on 2D Radiographs using a 2D/3D database. Computer Aided Surgery 2001, 6(4):183-194.