Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image

Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 529-538

  Väänänen, Sami P ^a   Isaksson, Hanna ^a   Julkunen, Petro ^b   Sirola, Joonas ^a   Kröger, Heikki ^a   Jurvelin, Jukka S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone strength; Computed tomography; Finite element; Proximal femur; Shape estimation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; ERRORS; ESTIMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE; GEOMETRY; X RAY RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE MINERAL DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENSITY IMAGES; FINITE ELEMENT; FRACTURE RISKS; GEOMETRICAL ERROR; PROXIMAL FEMUR; SHAPE ESTIMATION; SHAPE TEMPLATES;

BONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80054070019     PISSN: 16177959     EISSN: 16822978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-010-0253-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M et al (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34: 859-871 (Pubitemid 32530054)
2. Bland M, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327: 307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
3. Bookstein F (1989) Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 11:567-585
4. Cody D, Gross G, Hou FJ et al (1999) Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32:1013-1020 (Pubitemid 29356040)
5. Dryden I, Mardia K (1998) Statistical shape analysis.Wiley, New York
6. Edwards W, Gillette J, Thomas J et al (2008) Internal femoral forces and moments during running: implications for stress fracture development. Clin Biomech 23:1269-1278
7. Fang Q, Boas DA (2009) Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. In: International symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. IEEE, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
8. Filippi S, Motyl B, Bandera C (2007) Analysis of existing methods for 3D modelling of femurs starting from two orthogonal images and development of a script for a commercial software package. Comput Meth Prog Bio 89:76-82 (Pubitemid 50018974)
9. Gower J (1975) Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40: 33-51
10. Keyak J, Falkinstein Y (2003) Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. Med Eng Phys 25:781-787 (Pubitemid 39089844)
11. Keyak J, Rossi S, Jones K et al (2001) Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models.Med Eng Phys 23:657-664 (Pubitemid 34072903)
12. Keyak J, Rossi S, Jones K et al (1998) Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 31: 125-133 (Pubitemid 28195808)
13. Kolta S, Le Bras A, Mitton D et al (2005) Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device. Osteoporos Int 16:969-976 (Pubitemid 41127107)
14. Langton C, Pisharody S, Keyak J (2009) Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur. Med Eng Phys 31:668-672
15. Langton C, Pisharody S, Keyak J (2009) Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image. Osteoporos Int 20:455-461
16. Laporte S, Skalli W, De Guise J et al (2003) A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: application to the distal femur. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 6:1-6
17. Morgan E, Bayraktar H, Keaveny T (2003) Trabecular bone modulus- density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36: 897-904 (Pubitemid 36566627)
18. Pasco J, Seeman E, Henry M et al (2006) The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1404-1409 (Pubitemid 44127328)
19. Wirtz D, Pandorf T, Portheine F et al (2003) Concept and development of an orthotropic FE model of the proximal femur. J Biomech 36:289-293 (Pubitemid 36110593)