Generation of a 3D proximal femur shape from a single projection 2D radiographic image

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 455-461

  Langton, C M ^a,d   Pisharody, S ^b   Keyak, J H ^c  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Geometric morphometrics; Proximal femur; Three dimensional shape; Volumetric density

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMUR; IMAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VOLUMETRY; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 60349111200     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0665-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. CF Njeh T Fuerst D Hans GM Blake HK Genant 1999 Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment Appl Radiat Isotopes 50 215 236
2. DR Carter ML Bouxsein R Marcus 1992 New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data J Bone Miner Res 7 137 145
3. M Jergas M Breitenseher CC Gluer W Yu HK Genant 1995 Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual x-ray absorptiometry J Bone Miner Res 10 1101 1110
4. S Cvijetic M Korsic 2004 Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women Osteoporos Int 15 295 300
5. F Duboef R Pommet PJ Meunier PD Delmas 1994 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections Osteoporos Int 4 110 116
6. MA Sabin GM Blake SM MacLaughlin-Black I Fogelman 1995 The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry Calcif Tissue Int 56 210 214
7. NFA Peel R Eastell 1994 Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 9 317 320
8. M Boyanov P Popivanov G Gentchev 2002 Assessment of forearm volumetric bone mineral density from standard areal densitometry data J Clin Densitom 5 391 402
9. WD Leslie G DeVos JO Dupont AE Peterdy 2001 Reproducibility of volume-adjusted bone mineral denity of spine and hip from dual x-ray absorptiometry J Clin Densitom 4 307 312
10. Y-L Hou X-P Wu X-H Luo H Zhang X-Z Cao Y-B Jiang E-Y Liao 2007 Differences in age-related bone mass of proximal femur between Chinese women and different ethnic women in the United States J Bone Miner Metab 25 243 252
11. Caponetti l, Fanelli AM (1990) 3D bone reconstruction from two x-ray views. In Proc IEEE Conf Eng in Medicine and Biology, pp 208-210
12. Nikkhade-Dehkordi B, Bro-Nielsen M, Darvann T, Gramkow C, Egund N, Hermann K (1996) 3D reconstruction of the femoral bone using two x-ray images from orthogonal views. In Proc. Computer Assisted Radiology (CAR'96), pp 1015, Paris, France
13. Foley JD, Dam AV, Feiner SK, Hughes JF (1990) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley
14. S Laporte W Skalli JA de Guise F Lavaste D Mitton 2003 A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours-application to the distal femur Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6 1 6
15. S Kolta A Le Bras D Mitton V Bousson JA De Guise J Fechtenbaum JD Laredo C Roux W Skalli 2005 Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device Osteoporos Int 16 969 976
16. D Kendall 1977 The diffusion of shape Adv Appl Probab 9 428 430
17. Zheng G, Ballester M, Styner M, Nolte L (2006). Reconstruction of patient-specific 3D bone surface from 2D calibrated fluoroscopic images and point distribution model. In Proc International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp 25-32. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg
18. P Lang P Steiger K Faulkner C Gluer HK Genant 1991 Osteoporosis: Current techniques and recent developments in quantitative bone densitometry Radiol Clin North Am 29 49 76
19. JH Keyak TS Kaneko J Tehranzadeh HB Skinner 2005 Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models Clin Orthop Relat Res 437 219 228
20. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric morphometrics for biologists -a primer. Elsevier Academic Press
21. Rohlf FJ (1990) Rotational fit (procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (eds) (1990) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, number 2, University of Michigan
22. FL Bookstein 1989 Principal warps-thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11 567 585
23. Manly BFJ (2000) Multivariate statistical methods, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC
24. KA Ward DK Roy SR Pye TW O'Neill JL Berry CM Swarbrick AJ Silman JE Adams 2007 Forearm bone geometry and mineral content in UK women of European and South-Asian origin Bone 41 117 121
25. E Barrett-Connor ES Siris LE Wehren PD Miller TA Abbott ML Berger AC Santora LM Sherwood 2005 Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups J Bone Miner Res 20 185 194
26. M Meta Y Lua JH Keyak T Lang 2006 Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: a cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women Bone 36 152 158
27. PM Mayhew CD Thomas JG Clement N Loveridge TJ Beck W Bonfield CJ Burgoyne J Reeve 2005 Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability and hip fracture risk Lancet 366 129 135