Behavioral health providers' beliefs about health information exchange: A statewide survey

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 562-569

  Shank, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; WORKFLOW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; NEBRASKA;

EID: 84865161547     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000374     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Bourgeois FC, Olson KL, Mandl KD. Patients treated at multiple acute health care facilities. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1989-95.
2. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (US). Report to the Congress: New Approaches in Medicare. 2004. http://www.medpac.gov/documents/June04_Entire_Report.pdf (accessed 6 Apr 2011).
3. Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ 2006;174:1573-8.
4. Wright A, Soran C, Jenter CA, et al. Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:66-70.
5. Audet A, Doty MM, Peugh J, et al. Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? MedGenMed 2004;6:8. http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/493210 (accessed 6 Apr 2011).
6. Austin D, Pier C, Mitchell J, et al. Do GPs use electronic mental health resources? A qualitative study. Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:365-6.
7. Aydin CE, Rosen PN, Felitti VJ. Transforming information use in preventive medicine: learning to balance technology with the art of caring. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:563-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2247893/pdf/procascamc00001-0556.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
8. Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, et al. Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia's nurses: a national survey. J Clin Nurs 2008;18:1151-8.
9. Gans D, Kralewksi J, Hammons T, et al. Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Aff 2005;24:1323-33.
10. Marshall PD, Chin HL. The effects of an electronic medical record on patient care: clinician attitudes in a large HMO. Proc AMIA Symp 1998:150e4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2232329/pdf/procamiasymp00005-0186.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
11. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff 2004;23:116-26.
12. Penrod LE, Gadd CS. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:528-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2243431/pdf/procamiasymp00002-0567.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
13. Scheck McAlearney A, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ 2004; 328:1162-6. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7449/1162 (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
14. Lefkovitz PM. Behavioral health/human services information systems survey: executive summary/media release. 2009. http://www.thenationalcouncil.org/galleries/policy-file/HIT%20Joint%20Survey%20Exec%20Summary.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
15. Mojtabai R. Use of information technology by psychiatrists and other medical providers. Psychiatr Serv 2007;58:1261.
16. SK&A. Physician Office Usage of Electronic Healthcare Records Software. 2010. http://www.skainfo.com/press_releases.php?article=99 (accessed 20 Jul 2011).
17. Dickey B, Normand SLT, Weiss RD, et al. Medical morbidity, mental illness and substance use disorders. Psychiatr Serv 2002;53:861-7.
18. Farley T. Isolation to integration: the great leap forward. Fam Syst Health 2002;20:379-82.
19. Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care For Mental and Substance-Use Conditions: Quality Chasm Series. 2006. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309100445 (accessed 20 Jul 2011).
20. Klusman LE. Prescribing psychologists and patients' medical needs: lessons from clinical psychiatry. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2001;32:496-500.
21. Maj M. Physical illness and access to medical services in people with schizophrenia. Int J Ment Health 2008;37:13-21.
22. Pincus HA. The future of behavioral health and primary care: drowning in the mainstream or left on the bank? Psychosomatics 2003;44:1-11.
23. Pincus HA, Page AEK, Druss B, et al. Can psychiatry cross the quality chasm? Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance use conditions. Am J Psychiatry 2007;164:712-19.
24. Reynolds KM, Chesney BK, Capobianco J. A collaborative model for integrated mental and physical health care for the individual who is seriously and persistently mentally ill: the Washtenaw Community Health Organization. Fam Syst Health 2006;24:19-27.
25. Rost K, Humphrey J, Kelleher K. Physician management preferences and barriers to care for rural patients with depression. Arch Fam Med 1994;3:409-14.
26. 26. Ram S, Sheth JN. Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing 1989;6:5-14.
27. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1989;13:318-40.
28. Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2003;12. Article 50. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol12/iss1/50
29. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. J Pers Soc Psychol 1973;27:41-57.
30. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovation. 4th edn. New York, NY: Free Press, 1995.
31. Davis FD, Bagozzi R, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989;35:982-1003.
32. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 2000;46:186-204.
33. Holden RJ, Karsh B-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010;43:159-72.
34. Ma Q, Liu L. The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2004;16:59-72.
35. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:650-72.
36. Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Maruping LM, et al. Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2008;32:483-502.
37. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 2003;19:9-30.
38. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems 2007;16:725-37.
39. Bradley L, Stewart K. A Delphi study of the drivers and inhibitors of Internet banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing 2002;20:250-60.
40. Sheth JN. Psychology of innovation resistance: the less developed concept in diffusion research. Research in Marketing 1981;4:273-82.
41. Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects. J Mark 1989;53:35-49.
42. Szmigin I, Foxall G. Three forms of innovation resistance: the case of retail payment methods. Technovation 1998;18:459-68.
43. Venkatesh V, Brown SA. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. Management Information Systems Quarterly 2001;25:71-102.
44. Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consum Res 1998;25:187-217.
45. Cenfetelli RT. Inhibitors and enablers as dual factor concepts in technology usage. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2004;5:472-92.
46. Shank N, Willborn E, PytlikZillig L, et al. Electronic health records: eliciting behavioral health providers' beliefs. Community Ment Health J. Published Online First: 15 May 2011. doi:10.1007/s10597-011-9409-6.
47. BenMessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF. Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS One 2011;6:e16395.
48. Salomon RM, Blackford JU, Rosenbloom ST, et al. Openness of patients' reporting with use of electronic records: psychiatric clinicians' views. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:54-60. doi:10.1197/jamia.M3341.
49. Chen C, Hung S. To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management 2010;47:226-36.
50. Hertzum M. The importance of trust in software engineers' assessment and choice of information sources. Information and Organization 2002;12:1-18.
51. Hsiao C, Beatty PC, Hing ES, et al. Electronic Medical Record/Electronic Health Record Use By Office-Based Physicians: United States, 2008 and Preliminary 2009. 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/emr_ehr/emr_ehr.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
52. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
53. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991;50:179-211.
54. Ajzen I. Constructing a TpB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. 2006. http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf (accessed 20 Jul 2011).
55. Cassidy S, Eachus P. Developing the Computer User Self-Efficacy (CUSE) scale: investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2002;26:133-53.
56. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes. Austin, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1993.
57. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Wiley, 2000.
58. Widaman KF. Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behav Res 1993;28:263-311.
59. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, et al. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 1999;4:272-99.
60. Finch H. Comparison of the performance of varimax and promax rotations: factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement 2006;43:39-52.
61. Grice JW. A comparison of factor scores under conditions of factor obliquity. Psychol Methods 2001;6:67-83.
62. Grice JW. Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychol Methods 2001;6:430-50.
63. Lorr M. Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
64. SPSS. IBM SPSS Statistics Base 19. 2010. http://www.unileon.es/ficheros/servicios/informatica/spss/english/IBM-SPSS_basico.pdf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
65. th edn. Deerfield, IL: American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2011. http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm? Section=Standard_Definitions2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay. cfm&ContentID=3156 (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
66. Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat 2008;61:1139-60.
67. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
68. Fontaine P, Zink T, Boyle RB, et al. Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:622-9.
69. Cost and confidentiality: The unforeseen challenges of electronic health records in small specialty practices, 2008: Hearings before the House Small Business Committee, 110th Cong. 2nd Sess (testimony of Robert M. Plovnick, director, Department of Quality Improvement and Psychiatric Services, American Psychiatric Association). (accessed 31 Jul 2008).
70. Privacy and confidentiality issues concerning the National Health Information Network: 2005: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Privacy and Confidentiality, National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, 109th Cong. 1st Sess. (testimony of Russ Newman, Executive Director for Professional Practice, American Psychological Association). (accessed 30 Mar 2005).
71. Office of the Surgeon General. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General-Executive Summary. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, 1999.
72. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, 26 U.S.C. 1 Title XIII. 2009. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ5/pdf/PLAW-111publ5.pdf (accessed 20 Jul 2011).
73. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. 2008. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/91xx/doc9168/HealthITTOC.2.1.htm (accessed 20 Jul 2011).
74. Fleming NS, Culler SD, McCorkle R, et al. The financial and nonfinancial costs of implementing electronic health records in primary care practices. Health Aff 2011;30:481-9.
75. Duffy FF, West JC, Wilk J, et al. Mental health practitioners and trainees. In: Manderscheid RW, Henderson MJ, eds. Mental Health, United States, 2002. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration. 2004:327-68. DHHS Pub No. (SMA) 3938.
76. Hess TJ, Joshi K, McNab AL. An alternative lens for understanding technology acceptance: an equity comparison perspective. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 2010;20:123-54.