Health information exchange: Participation by Minnesota primary care practices

Archives of Internal Medicine

Volumn 170, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 622-629

  Fontaine, Patricia ^a   Zink, Therese ^a   Boyle, Raymond G ^a   Kralewski, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MINNESOTA; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950988935     PISSN: 00039926     EISSN: 15383679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Open Congress for the 111th United States Congress Web site. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1/ show. Accessed January 4, 2010.
2. Grossman JM, Kushner KL, November EA. Creating sustainable local health information exchanges: can barriers to stakeholder participation be overcome? Res Briefs. 2008;2(2):1-12.
3. McGowan JJ, Jordan C, Sims T, Overhage JM. Rural RHIOs: common issues in the development of two state-wide health information networks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;10(11):528-532.
4. Solomon MR. Regional health information organizations: a vehicle for transforming health care delivery? J Med Syst. 2007;31(1):35-47.
5. Measuring and reporting health care quality in Minnesota. Minnesota Community Measurement Web site. http://www.mncm.org/site/?p=home. Accessed January 15, 2010.
6. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining Key Health Information Technology Terms. Washington, DC: United States Dept of Health and Human Services; 2008.
7. Defining key health information technology terms. Department of Health and Human Services Web site. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/ PTARGS-0-10741-848133-0-0-18/10-2-hit-terms.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2010.
8. Rosenfeld S, Koss S, Caruth K, Fuller G. Evolution of State Health Information Exchange. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006. AHRQ publication 06-0057.
9. Minnesota Department of Health, Office of the Commissioner. Minnesota e-Health Initiative: Report to the Minnesota Legislature 2009. Minnesota Department of Health Web site. http://www.health.state.mn.us/e-health/ legrpt2009.html. Accessed October 5, 2009.
10. Health information and technology infrastructure: 2007. Office of the Revisor of Statutes of the State of Minnesota Web site. https://www.revisor.leg. state.mn.us/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT-CHAP-SEC&year=current§ion= 62J.495&image.x=12&image.y=9. Accessed January 4, 2010.
11. Holmquest DL. Another lesson from Santa Barbara. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):w592-w594.
12. Hripcsak G, Kaushal R, Johnson KB, et al. The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(6)(suppl):S3-S10. (Pubitemid 350087815)
13. Rudin RS, Simon SR, Volk LA, Tripathi M, Bates D. Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(5):950-955.
14. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co; 1967.
15. Kralewski JE, Dowd BE, Cole-Adeniyi T, Gans D, Malakar L, Elson B. Factors influencing physician use of clinical electronic information technologies after adoption by their medical group practices. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33(4):361-367.
16. Kralewski J, Dowd BE, Kaissi A, Curoe A, Rockwood T. Measuring the culture of medical group practices. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30(3):184-193.
17. Borkan J. Immersion/crystallization. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1999:179-194.
18. Electronic medical records and immunization registries: the benefits of exchanging data. Minnesota Department of Health Web site. http://www.health. state.mn.us/divs/idepc/immunize/registry/hp/emedrecords.html. Accessed January 4, 2010.
19. Electronic prescribing incentive fact sheet. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services/United States Department of Health and Human Services Web site. http://cms.hhs.gov/pqri/downloads/pqrieprescribingfactsheet.pdf. Accessed January 30, 2010.
20. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50-60.
21. Frisse ME, Holmes RL. Estimated financial savings associated with health information exchange and ambulatory care referral. J Biomedical Informatics. 2007;40(6)(suppl):S27-S32.
22. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Middleton B. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; Jan-Jun(suppl):WS-10-WS-18.
23. Adler-Milstein J, McAfee AP, Bates DW, Jha AK. The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(1):w60-w69.
24. Carter P, Lemery C, Mikels D, Bowen R, Hjort B. Privacy and security in health information exchange. J AHIMA. 2006;77(10):64A-64C.
25. Diamond C, Ricciardi L. Building consumer trust into health information exchange. J AHIMA. 2006;77(10):36-38.
26. Halamka J, Overhage JM, Ricciardi L, Rishel W, Shirky C, Diamond C. Exchanging health information: local distribution, national coordination. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(5):1170-1179.
27. Electronic health care record landscape assessment: Minnesota's primary care clinics. Stratis Health Web site. http://www.stratishealth.org/documents/ ClinicEHRLandscapeAssessment0807.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2010.
28. Health Information Technology Policy Committee Meaningful Use Comments. Minnesota Department of Health Web site. http://www.health.state.mn.us/e-health/ hitech/ht062609meaningful.pdf. Accessed January 4, 2010.