Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: Contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  BenMessaoud, Christine ^a   Kharrazi, Hadi ^a   MacDorman, Karl F ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPEN SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SURGEON; SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TECHNOLOGY;

DATA COLLECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 79251609110     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016395     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bergeron B (2002) Achieving clinician buy-in to technology. Medscape General Medicine 4(4). Available: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/446224. Accessed 2010 Sept 15.
2. Talamini MA, Hanly EJ (2005) Technology in the operating suite. Journal of the American Medical Association 293: 863-866.
3. Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: Applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Medscape General Medicine 7(3): 72.
4. Holden RJ, Karsh TB (2009) Atheoretical model of health information technology usage behaviour with implications for patient safety. Behaviour & Information Technology 28: 1-17.
5. Haggag AA (2006) Robotic surgery: When technology meets surgical precision. Internet Journal of Health 5(1): 3.
6. Tabor W (2007) On the cutting edge of robotic surgery. Nursing 37(2): 48-50.
7. Furukawa T, Morikawa Y, Ozawa S, Wakabayashi G, Kitajima M (2001) The revolution of computer-aided surgery: The dawn of robotic surgery. Minimal Invasive Theraphy & Allied Technology 10(6): 283-288.
8. Karamanoukian RL, Donias HW, Glick PL, Bergsland J, Karamanoukian H (2002) Survey of resident training in robotic surgery. American Surgeon 68(2): 177-181.
9. Gomez G (2004) Emerging technology in surgery: Informatics, electronics, robotics. In: Townsend Jr. CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, eds. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 17th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Saunders. 2000 p.
10. Meadows M (2002) Robots lend a helping hand to surgeons. FDA Consumer 36(3): 10.
11. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: A current perspective. Annals of Surgery 239: 14-21.
12. Lowenfels AB (2004) Robotics. Available: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/511854_4. Accessed 2010 Sept 15.
13. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Finley D, Stevens M, Paya M (2004) Application of robotics in general surgery: Initial experience. American Surgeon 70(10): 914-917.
14. Finan MA, Rocconi RP (2010) Overcoming technical challenges with robotic surgery in gynechologic oncology. Surgical Endoscopy 24: 1256-1260.
15. von Gruenigen VE, Sawyer MD, Ponsky LE, Hurd WW (2009) Recent innovations in minimally invasive surgery and implications for gynecology. Journal of Gynecology Surgery 25(2): 67-72.
16. Marescaux J, Rubino F (2005) Robotic surgery: Potentials, barriers, and limitations. European Surgery 37(5): 279-283.
17. Van J (2007, Sept 7) Robotic help at heart of hospital's initiative - U. of C. hires expert in bypass procedure. Chicago Tribune. Available: http://www. highbeam.com/doc/1G1-168370175.html. Accessed 2010 Sept 15.
18. Mathews CA (2010) Application of robotic surgery in gynecology. Journal of Woman's Health 19(5): 863-867.
19. Berci G, Phillips E, Fujita F (2004) The operating room of the future: What, when and why? Surgical Endoscopy 18: 1-5.
20. Murphy DA, Miller JS, Langford DA, Snyder AB (2006) Endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 132: 776-781.
21. Nazemi T, Galich A, Smith L, Balaji K (2006) Robotic urological surgery in patients with prior abdominal operations is not associated with increased complications. International Journal of Urology 13: 248-251.
22. Bocca S, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S (2007) Current status of robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine and gynaecology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14: 765-772.
23. McLeod IK, Mair EA, Melder PC (2005) Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology, ENT - Ear, Nose & Throat Journal 84(8): 484-487.
24. Geffen D (2009) UCLA Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology. Available: http://casit.ucla.edu/body.cfm?id = 13. Accessed 2010 Sept 15.
25. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB (2007) Technology acceptance among physicians: A new take on TAM. Medical Care Research and Review 64: 650-672.
26. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly 27(3): 425-478.
27. Chau PYK, Hu PJ (2002) Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(4): 191-229.
28. Schurr M, Arezzo A, Buess G (1999) Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedures: Experiences in general surgery. European Journal of Cardiothorac Surgery 16: 97-105.
29. Camarillo D, Krummel T, Salisbury K (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: Past, present, and future. American Journal of Surgery 188: 2S-15S.
30. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3): 319-340.
31. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35: 982-1003.
32. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 278 p.
33. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 480 p.
34. Malhotra Y, Galletta DF (1999) Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp 1-14.
35. Rawstorne P, Jayasuriya R, Caputi P (2000) Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems. pp 35-44.
36. Holden RJ, Karsh BT (2010) The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 43: 159-172.
37. Creswell JW (2003) Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 296 p.
38. Neuendorf KA (2002) The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 320 p.
39. Kvale S (1996) InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 344 p.