Introduction: The present and the future in metacognition

Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-18

  Efklides, Anastasia ^a   Misailidi, Plousia ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Individual differences; Metacognition; Nonconscious vs. conscious processes; Self regulation; Uncertainty monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865125366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_1     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. Ariel, R., Dunlonsky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432-447.
2. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
3. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391-408.
4. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
5. Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgments, and their interrelations. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19-34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14.
7. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287.
8. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-325). Hillsddale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
10. Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.
12. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (1999). Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Informationbased and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 483-502). New York: Guilford.
14. Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36-69.
15. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
16. Mangan, B. (1993). Some philosophical and empirical implications of the fringe. Consciousness and Cognition, 2, 142-154.
17. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
18. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000.
20. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., & Dardenne, B. (Eds.). (1998). Metacognition: Cognitive and socialdimensions. London: Sage.
21. Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students' development of academic selfregulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Vol. 4. Big theories revisited. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.