Comparative analysis of Codon usage bias and Codon context patterns between dipteran and hymenopteran sequenced genomes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Behura, Susanta K ^a   Severson, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEDES AEGYPTI; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ANOPHELES GAMBIAE; ANT; ARTICLE; ATTA CEPHALOTES; BIOINFORMATICS; CAMPONOTUS FLORIDANUS; CODON; CODON CONTEXT PATTERN; CODON USAGE BIAS; CULEX QUINQUEFASCIATUS; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA ANANASSAE; DROSOPHILA ERECTA; DROSOPHILA GRIMSHAWI; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS; DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS; DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA; DROSOPHILA SECHELLIA; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; DROSOPHILA VIRILIS; DROSOPHILA WILLISTONI; DROSOPHILA YAKUBA; FLY; GC RICH SEQUENCE; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HARPEGNATHOS SALTATOR; HONEYBEE; HYMENOPTERA; INSECT GENOME; LINEPITHEMA HUMILE; NASONIA VITRIPENNIS; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POGONOMYRNEX BARBATUS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES COMPARISON; START CODON; STOP CODON; SYNONYMOUS CODON USAGE ORDER; TRINUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; WASP;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DIPTERA; GENOME, INSECT; HYMENOPTERA; LOGISTIC MODELS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84865066278     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bulmer M, (1988) Are codon usage patterns in unicellular organisms determined by selection- mutation balance. J Evol Biol 1: 15-26.
2. Sharp PM, Stenico M, Peden JF, Lloyd AT, (1993) Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both? Biochem Soc Trans 21: 835-841.
3. Kliman RM, Hey J, (2003) Hill-Robertson interference in Drosophila melanogaster: reply to Marais, Mouchiroud and Duret. Genet Res 81: 89-90.
4. Akashi H, (1997) Codon bias evolution in Drosophila. Population genetics of mutation-selection drift. Gene 205: 269-278.
5. Rocha EP, (2004) Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. Genome Res 14: 2279-2286.
6. Hershberg R, Petrov DA, (2008) Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet 42: 287-299.
7. Sharp PM, Emery LR, Zeng K, (2010) Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365: 1203-1212.
8. Plotkin JB, Kudla G, (2011) Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet 12: 32-42.
9. Sharp PM, Matassi G, (1994) Codon usage and genome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 4: 851-860.
10. Powell JR, Moriyama EN, (1997) Evolution of codon usage bias in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 7784-7790.
11. Moriyama EN, Powell JR, (1998) Gene length and codon usage bias in Drosophila melanogaster, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 3188-3193.
12. Powell JR, Sezzi E, Moriyama EN, Gleason JM, Caccone A, (2003) Analysis of a shift in codon usage in Drosophila. J Mol Evol 57 (Suppl 1): S214-225.
13. Moura G, Pinheiro M, Arrais J, Gomes AC, Carreto L, et al. (2007) Large scale comparative codon-pair context analysis unveils general rules that fine-tune evolution of mRNA primary structure. PLoS One 2: e847.
14. Vicario S, Moriyama EN, Powell JR, (2007) Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol Biol 7: 226.
15. Heger A, Ponting CP, (2007) Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species. Genetics 177: 1337-1348.
16. Jørgensen FG, Schierup MH, Clark AG, (2007) Heterogeneity in regional GC content and differential usage of codons and amino acids in GC-poor and GC-rich regions of the genome of Apis mellifera. Mol Biol Evol 24: 611-961.
17. Wright F, (1990) The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 87: 23-29.
18. Das S, Roymondal U, Sahoo S, (2009) Analyzing gene expression from relative codon usage bias in Yeast genome: A statistical significance and biological relevance. Gene 443: 121-131.
19. Dunnett CW, (1980) Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. J Am Stat Assoc 75: 796-800.
20. Vinogradov AE, (2001) Intron length and codon usage. J Mol Evol 52: 2-5.
21. Füllen G, Youvan DC (1994) Genetic algorithms and recursive ensemble mutagenesis in protein engineering. Complex Int 1.
22. Suen G, Teiling C, Li L, Holt C, Abouheif E, et al. (2011) The genome sequence of the leaf-cutter ant Atta cephalotes reveals insights into its obligate symbiotic lifestyle. PLoS Genet 7: e1002007.
23. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH, (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 10240: 14338-14343.
24. Behura SK, Stanke M, Desjardins CA, Werren JH, Severson DW, (2010) Comparative analysis of nuclear tRNA genes of Nasonia vitripennis and other arthropods, and relationships to codon usage bias. Insect Mol Biol 19 (Suppl 1): 49-58.
25. Behura SK, Severson DW, (2011) Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol 20: 177-187.
26. Moura GR, Pinheiro M, Freitas A, Oliveira J, Frommlet JC, et al. (2011) Species-specific codon context rules unveil non-neutrality effects of synonymous mutations. PLoS One 6: e26817.
27. Tats A, Tenson T, Remm M, (2008) Preferred and avoided codon pairs in three domains of life. BMC Genomics 9: 463.
28. Buchan JR, Aucott LS, Stansfield I, (2006) tRNA properties help shape codon context preferences in open reading frames. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 1015-1027.
29. Kopelowitz J, Hampe C, Goldman R, Reches M, Engelberg-Kulka H, (1992) Influence of codon context on UGA suppression and readthrough. J Mol Biol 225: 261-269.
30. Pesole G, Gissi C, Grillo G, Licciulli F, Liuni S, et al. (2000) Analysis of oligonucleotide AUG start codon context in eukariotic mRNAs. Gene 261: 85-91.
31. Wong JT, (1975) A co-evolution theory of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72: 1909-1912.
32. Wernersson R, Pedersen AG, (2003) RevTrans: Multiple alignment of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 3537-3539.
33. Sharp PM, Li WH, (1986) An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24: 28-38.
34. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S, (2004) Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics. 20: 1453-1454.
35. Chamary JV, Hurst LD, (2005) Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals. Genome Biol 6: R75.
36. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech J 27: 379-423, 623-656.
37. Schneider TD, Stormo GD, Gold L, Ehrenfeucht A, (1986) Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences. J Mol Biol 188: 415-431.
38. Wan XF, Xu D, Kleinhofs A, Zhou J (20040 Quantitative relationship between synonymous codon usage bias and GC composition across unicellular genomes. BMC Evol Biol 4: 19.
39. Angellotti MC, Bhuiyan SB, Chen G, Wan X, (2007) CodonO: codon usage bias analysis within and across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W132-136.
40. Eyre-Walker A, Hurst LD, (2001) The evolution of isochors. Nat Rev Genet 2: 549-555.
41. Aoi MC, Rourke BC, (2011) Interspecific and intragenic differences in codon usage bias among vertebrate myosin heavy-chain genes. J Mol Evol 73: 74-93.