Comparative genomics among Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces kudriavzevii natural hybrid strains isolated from wine and beer reveals different origins

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Peris, David ^a   Lopes, Christian A ^b,c   Belloch, Carmela ^b   Querol, Amparo ^b   Barrio, Eladio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEER; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENOME; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS ISOLATION; LOW TEMPERATURE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; PLOIDY; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; WINE;

BEER; DNA, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII;

EID: 84865049155     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-407     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. González SS, Barrio E, Gafner J, Querol A. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6:1221-1234. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00126.x, 17156019.
2. González SS, Barrio E, Querol A. Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:2314-2320. 10.1128/AEM.01867-07, 2293171, 18296532.
3. Lopandić K, Gangl H, Wallner E, Tscheik G, Leitner G, Querol A, Borth N, Breitenbach M, Prillinger H, Tiefenbrunner W. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 2007, 7:953-965. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00240.x, 17484739.
4. de Barros Lopes M, Bellon JR, Shirley NJ, Ganter PF. Evidence for multiple interspecific hybridization in Saccharomyces sensu stricto species. FEMS Yeast Res 2002, 1:323-331.
5. Groth C, Hansen J, Piškur J. A natural chimeric yeast containing genetic material from three species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999, 49:1933-1938. 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1933, 10555378.
6. Liti G, Peruffo A, James SA, Roberts IN, Louis EJ. Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR-retrotransposons and telomeric-associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Yeast 2005, 22:177-192. 10.1002/yea.1200, 15704235.
7. Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, Piškur J, Dubourdieu D. New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64:3887-3892. 106574, 9758815.
8. Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, Gonçalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011, 108:14539-14544. 10.1073/pnas.1105430108, 3167505, 21873232.
9. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:2144-2152. 10.1128/AEM.02396-07, 2292605, 18281431.
10. Lopes CA, Barrio E, Querol A. Natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces kudriavzevii share alleles with European wild populations of S. kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 2010, 10:412-421. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00614.x, 20337723.
11. Arroyo-López FN, Orlić S, Querol A, Barrio E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrids. Int J Food Microbiol 2009, 131:120-127. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.035, 19246112.
12. Salvadó Z, Arroyo-López FN, Barrio E, Querol A, Guillamón JM. Quantifying the individual effects of ethanol and temperature on the fitness advantage of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Food Microbiol 2011, 28:1155-1161. 10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.008, 21645814.
13. Belloch C, Pérez-Torrado R, González SS, Pérez-Ortín JE, García-Martínez J, Querol A, Barrio E. Chimeric genomes of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:2534-2544. 10.1128/AEM.02282-08, 2675219, 19251887.
14. Haase SB, Reed SI. Improved flow cytometric analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2002, 1:132-136.
15. Querol A, Barrio E, Ramón D. A comparative study of different methods of yeast-strain characterization. Syst Appl Microbiol 1992, 15:439-446.
16. Brazma A. ArrayExpress, a public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:68-71. 10.1093/nar/gkg091, 165538, 12519949.
17. Myers CL, Dunham MJ, Kung SY, Troyanskaya OG. Accurate detection of aneuploidies in array CGH and gene expression microarray data. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3533-3543. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth440, 15284100.
18. Cliften PF, Sudarsanam P, Desikan A, Fulton L, Fulton B, Majors J, Waterston R, Cohen BA, Johnston M. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 2003, 301:71-76. 10.1126/science.1084337, 12775844.
19. Peris D, Belloch C, Lopandić K, Álvarez-Pérez JM, Querol A, Barrio E. The molecular characterization of new types of S. cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii hybrid yeasts unveils a high genetic diversity. Yeast 2012, 29:81-91.
20. Doniger SW, Salomonis N, Dahlquist KD, Vranizan K, Lawlor SC, Conklin BR. MAPPFinder: using Gene Ontology and GenMAPP to create a global gene-expression profile from microarray data. Genome Biol 2003, 4:R7. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-1-r7, 151291, 12540299.
21. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package 2005, University of Washington, Seattle, v. 369.
22. Dunn B, Sherlock G. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res 2008, 18:1610-1623. 10.1101/gr.076075.108, 2556262, 18787083.
23. Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T, Kodama Y, Rainieri S, Nakamura N, Shimonaga T, Hattori M, Ashikari T. Genome sequencing of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res 2009, 16:115-129. 10.1093/dnares/dsp003, 2673734, 19261625.
24. Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 2010, 468:321-325. 10.1038/nature09529, 2978756, 20962780.
25. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, Egholm M, Chambers PJ. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:88-96. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x, 22136070.
26. Sipiczki M. Interspecies hybridisation and recombination in Saccharomyces wine yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:996-1007. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00369.x, 18355270.
27. Barrio E, González SS, Arias A, Belloch C, Querol A. Molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptive evolution of industrial yeasts. Yeasts in Food and Beverages 2006, 153-174. Springer, Berlin, Querol A, Fleet GH, 1.
28. Antunovics Z, Nguyen HV, Gaillardin C, Sipiczki M. Gradual genome stabilisation by progressive reduction of the Saccharomyces uvarum genome in an interspecific hybrid with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2005, 5:1141-1150. 10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.04.008, 15982931.
29. Rainieri S, Kodama Y, Nakao Y, Pulvirenti A, Giudici P. The inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in lager brewing strains. FEMS Yeast Res 2008, 8:586-596. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00363.x, 18318709.
30. Solieri L, Antúnez O, Pérez-Ortín JE, Barrio E, Giudici P. Mitochondrial inheritance and fermentative: oxidative balance in hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum. Yeast 2008, 25:485-500. 10.1002/yea.1600, 18615860.
31. Vero LDE, Pulvirenti A, Gullo M, Bonatti P, Giudici P. Sorting of mitochondrial DNA and proteins in the progeny of Saccharomyces interspecific hybrids. Ann Microbiol 2003, 53:219-231.
32. Lee HY, Chou JY, Cheong L, Chang NH, Yang SY, Leu JY. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 2008, 135:1065-1073. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.047, 19070577.
33. Chou JY, Hung YS, Lin KH, Lee HY, Leu JY. Multiple molecular mechanisms cause reproductive isolation between three yeast species. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000432. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000432, 2907292, 20652018.
34. Sickmann A, Reinders J, Wagner Y, Joppich C, Zahedi R, Meyer HE, Schönfisch B, Perschil I, Chacinska A, Guiard B, Rehling P, Pfanner N, Meisinger C. The proteome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:13207-13212. 10.1073/pnas.2135385100, 263752, 14576278.
35. Aguilera J, Rández-Gil F, Prieto JA. Cold response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new functions for old mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2007, 31:327-341. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00066.x, 17298585.
36. Beltrán G, Novo M, Leberre V, Sokol S, Labourdette D, Guillamón JM, Mas A, François J, Rozès N. Integration of transcriptomic and metabolic analyses for understanding the global responses of low-temperature winemaking fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 2006, 6:1167-1183. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00106.x, 17156014.
37. Higgins VJ, Beckhouse AG, Oliver AD, Rogers PJ, Dawes IW. Yeast genome-wide expression analysis identifies a strong ergosterol and oxidative stress response during the initial stages of an industrial lager fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:4777-4787. 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4777-4787.2003, 169144, 12902271.
38. Belloch C, Orlić S, Barrio E, Querol A. Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Int J Food Microbiol 2008, 122:188-195. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.083, 18222562.
39. Dunn B, Levine RP, Sherlock G. Microarray karyotyping of commercial wine yeast strains reveals shared, as well as unique, genomic signatures. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:53. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-53, 1097725, 15833139.
40. Carreto L, Eiriz M, Gomes A, Pereira P, Schuller D, Santos M. Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:524. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-524, 2588607, 18983662.
41. Di Rienzi SC, Collingwood D, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ. Fragile genomic sites are associated with origins of replication. Genome Biol Evol 2009, 1:350-363. 2817429, 20333204.
42. Kim JM, Vanguri S, Boeke JD, Gabriel A, Voytas DF. Transposable elements and genome organization: a comprehensive survey of retrotransposons revealed by the complete Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome sequence. Genome Res 1998, 8:464-478.
43. Pérez-Ortín JE, Querol A, Puig S, Barrio E. Molecular characterization of a chromosomal rearrangement involved in the adaptive evolution of yeast strains. Genome Res 2002, 12:1533-1539. 10.1101/gr.436602, 187534, 12368245.
44. Hittinger CT, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP, Dover J, Johnston M, Rokas A. Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 2010, 464:54-58. 10.1038/nature08791, 2834422, 20164837.