The molecular characterization of new types of Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii hybrid yeasts unveils a high genetic diversity

Yeast

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 81-91

  Peris, David ^a   Belloch, Carmela ^b   Lopandić, Ksenija ^c   Álvarez Pérez, José Manuel ^c   Querol, Amparo ^b   Barrio, Eladio ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Clinical yeasts; Dietary; S. cerevisiae; S. kudriavzevii; Saccharomyces hybrids; Wine

Indexed keywords

CYCLOOXYGENASE 2; SCATTER FACTOR RECEPTOR; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE SUBUNIT II; FUNGAL DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; EXTRACHROMOSOMAL INHERITANCE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HYBRID; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTRICTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; YEAST; CHIMERA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; SACCHAROMYCES; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII;

BASE SEQUENCE; CHIMERA; DNA, FUNGAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; HAPLOTYPES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; WINE;

EID: 84856599123     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.2891     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arroyo-López FN, Pérez-Través L, Querol A, Barrio E. 2011. Exclusion of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from a wine model system mediated by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28: 423-435.
2. Barrio E, González SS, Arias A, et al. 2006. Molecular mechanisms involved in the adaptive evolution of industrial yeasts. In Yeasts in Food and Beverages, Querol A, Fleet GH (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 153-174.
3. Belloch C, Pérez-Torrado R, González SS, et al. 2009. Chimeric genomes of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2534-2544.
4. Belloch C, Querol A, García MD, Barrio E. 2000. Phylogeny of the genus Kluyveromyces inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase II gene. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 405-416.
5. Berger KH, Yaffe MP. 2000. Mitochondrial DNA inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Microbiol 8: 508-513.
6. Bradbury J, Richards K, Niederer H, et al. 2006. A homozygous diploid subset of commercial wine yeast strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 89: 27-37.
7. Demuyter C, Lollier M, Legras JL, Le Jeune C. 2004. Predominance of Saccharomyces uvarum during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation, for three consecutive years, in an Alsatian winery. J Appl Microbiol 97: 1140-1148.
8. González SS, Barrio E, Gafner J, Querol A. 2006. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res 6: 1221-1234.
9. González SS, Barrio E, Querol A. 2008. Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii from brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2314-2320.
10. González SS, Gallo L, Climent MD, et al. 2007. Enological characterization of natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii. Int J Food Microbiol 116: 11-18.
11. Groth C, Hansen J, Piškur J. 1999. A natural chimeric yeast containing genetic material from three species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49: 1933-1938.
12. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59: 307-321.
13. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254-267.
14. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, et al. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
15. Kodama Y, Kielland-Brandt MC, Hansen J. 2005. Lager brewing yeast. In Comparative Genomics: Using Fungi as Models, Sunnerhagen P, Piškur J (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin; 145-164.
16. Kurtzman CP. 2003. Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces, Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora. FEMS Yeast Res 4: 233-245.
17. Lee HY, Chou JY, Cheong L, et al. 2008. Incompatibility of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes causes hybrid sterility between two yeast species. Cell 135: 1065-1073.
18. deLlanos R, Querol A, Planes AM, Fernández-Espinar MT. 2004. Molecular characterization of clinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates and their associaton with non-clinical strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 27: 427-435.
19. Lopandić K, Gangl H, Wallner E, et al. 2007. Genetically different wine yeasts isolated from Austrian vine-growing regions influence wine aroma differently and contain putative hybrids between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 953-965.
20. Lopes CA, Barrio E, Querol A. 2010. Natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae×Saccharomyces kudriavzevii share alleles with European wild populations of S. kudriavzevii. FEMS Yeast Res 10: 412-421.
21. Masneuf I, Hansen J, Groth C, et al. 1998. New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3887-3892.
22. Naumov GI, Masneuf I, Naumova ES, et al. 2000. Association of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum with some French wines: genetic analysis of yeast populations. Res Microbiol 151: 683-691.
23. Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Antunovics Z, Sipiczki M. 2002. Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum in Tokaj wine-making of Slovakia and Hungary. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59: 727-730.
24. Naumov GI, Nguyen HV, Naumova ES, et al. 2001. Genetic identification of Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum, a cider-fermenting yeast. Int J Food Microbiol 65: 163-171.
25. Naumova ES, Naumov GI, Masneuf-Pomarède I, et al. 2005. Molecular genetic study of introgression between Saccharomyces bayanus and S. cerevisiae. Yeast 22: 1099-1115.
26. Orlić S, Arroyo-López FN, Huic-Babić K, et al. 2010. A comparative study of the wine fermentation performance of Saccharomyces paradoxus under different nitrogen concentrations and glucose:fructose ratios. J Appl Microbiol 108: 73-80.
27. Posada D. 2003. Inferring evolutionary relationships: using Modeltest and PAUP* to select a model of nucleotide substitution. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, Baxevanis AD, Page RDM, Petsko GA, et al. (eds). Wiley: New York; 6.5.1-6.5.14.
28. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1253-1256.
29. Querol A, Bond U. 2009. The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett 293: 1-10.
30. Querol A, Barrio E, Huerta T, Ramón D. 1992. Molecular monitoring of wine fermentations conducted by active dry yeast strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 58: 2948-2953.
31. Querol A, Fernández-Espinar MT, del Olmo M, Barrio E. 2003. Adaptative evolution of wine yeast. Int J Food Microbiol 86: 3-10.
32. Redzepović S, Orlić S, Sikora S, et al. 2002. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus strains isolated from Croatian vineyards. Lett Appl Microbiol 35: 305-310.
33. Rementería A, Rodríguez JA, Cadaval A, et al. 2003. Yeast associated with spontaneous fermentations of white wines from the 'Txakoli de Bizkaia' region (Basque Country, North Spain). Int J Food Microbiol 86: 201-207.
34. Sampaio JP, Gonçalves P. 2008. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2144-2152.
35. Schütz M, Gafner J. 1994. Dynamics of the yeast strain population during spontaneous alcoholic fermentation determined by CHEF gel electrophoresis. Lett Appl Microbiol 19: 253-257.
36. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596-1599.
37. Torriani S, Zapparoli G, Suzzi G. 1999. Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Saccharomyces sensu stricto strains isolated from Amarone wine. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 75: 207-215.
38. Vaughan-Martini A, Martini A. 2011. Saccharomyces Meyen ex. Reess (1870). In The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 5th edn, Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (eds). Elsevier: London; 733-746.
39. Wang SA, Bai FY. 2008. Saccharomyces arboricolus sp. nov., a yeast species from tree bark. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58: 510-514.