Molecular phylogenetics of Echinopsis (Cactaceae): Polyphyly at all levels and convergent evolution of pollination modes and growth forms

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 99, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1335-1349

  Schlumpberger, Boris O ^a,b   Renner, Susanne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cactaceae; Chromosome counts; Echinopsis; Growth form evolution; Phylogenetics; Pollination modes; Polyploidy; Trichocereeae

Indexed keywords

CACTUS; CHLOROPLAST; CHROMOSOME; CLADISTICS; CONVERGENT EVOLUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 84865027065     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1100288     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ANDERSON, E. F. 2001. The cactus family. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
2. ANDERSON, E. F. 2005. Das große Kakteen-Lexikon. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.
3. ARAKAKI, M., P. A. CHRISTIN, B. NYFFELER, A. LENDEL, U. EGGLI, R. M. OGBURN, E. SPRIGGS, M. J. MOORE, and E. J. EDWARDS. 2011. Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world's major succulent plant lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 8379-8384.
4. ARAKAKI, M., D. E. SOLTIS, and P. SPERANZA. 2007. New chromosome counts and evidence of polyploidy in Haageocereus and related genera in tribe Trichocereeae and other tribes of Cactaceae. Brittonia 59: 290-297.
5. ASMUSSEN, C. B. 1999. Toward a chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the tribe Geonomeae (Palmeae). In A. Henderson, and F. Borchsenius [eds.], Evolution, variation, and classification of palms. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 83: 121-129.
6. BACKEBERG, C. 1958-1962. Die Cactaceae. Handbuch der Kakteenkunde, 6 vols. Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
7. BAKER, M. A. 2002. Chrosmosome numbers and their significance in some Opuntioideae and Cactoideae (Cactaceae) of mainland Ecuador and Peru. Haseltonia 9: 69-77.
8. BARTHLOTT, W., and D. R. HUNT. 1993. Cactacae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer, and V. Bittrich [eds.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
9. BRITTON, N. L., and J. N. ROSE. 1919-1923. The Cactaceae, 4 vols. Carnegie Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. COTA, J. H., and C. T. PHILBRICK. 1994. Number variation and polyploidy in the genus Echinocereus (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1054-1062.
11. COTA, J. H., and R. S. WALLACE. 1995. Karyotypic studies in the genus Echinocereus and its taxonomic implications. Caryologia 48: 105-122.
12. DIERS, L. 2008a. Over chromosomen bij cactussen-ter herinnering aan Albert Buining (1). Succulenta 87: 83-92.
13. DIERS, L. 2008b. Over chromosomen bij cactussen-ter herinnering aan Albert Buining (2). Succulenta 87: 127-140.
14. DIERS, L. 2008c. Over chromosomen bij cactussen-ter herinnering aan Albert Buining (3). Succulenta 87: 180-187.
15. DIERS, L. 2009. Lobivia krahn-juckeri (Cactaceae)-eine neue Art aus Bolivien. Kakteen und andere Sukkulenten 8: 215-223.
16. FRIEDRICH, H. 1974. Zur Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Echinopsidinae (Trichocereinae). IOS-Bulletin 3: 79-93.
17. FRIEDRICH, H., and W. GLÄTZLE. 1983. Seed morphology as an aid to classifying the genus Echinopsis Zucc. Bradleya 1: 91-104.
18. FONT, F., and P. PICCA. 2001. Geographical distribution and state of conservation of the populations of Lobivia walteri Kiesling and Trichocereus smrzianus (Backeb.) Backeb. (Cactaceae) in the province of Salta, Argentina. British Cactus and Succulent Journal 19: 2-14.
19. HALDA, J. J., and L. HORÁCEK. 1999. New descriptions and combinations. Acta Musei Richnoviensis 6: 234-238.
20. HAMILTON, M. B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Molecular Ecology 8: 521-525.
21. HANSEN, A. K., L. E. GILBERT, B. B. SIMPSON, S. R. DOWNIE, A. C.C ERVI, and R. K. JANSEN. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships and chromosome number evolution in Passiflora. Systematic Botany 31: 138-150.
22. Hernández-Hernández, T., H. M.H ERNÁNDEZ, J. A. De-Nova, R. PUENTE, L. E. EGUIARTE, and S. MAGALLÓN. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae). American Journal of Botany 98: 44-61.
23. HERSHKOVITZ, M. A. E., and A. ZIMMER. 1997. On the evolutionary origin of the cacti. Taxon 46: 217-232.
24. HIPP, A. L., P. E. ROTHROCK, A. A. REZNICEK, and P. E. BERRY. 2007. Chromosome number changes associated with speciation in sedges: A phylogenetic study in Carex section Ovales (Cyperaceae) using AFLP data. Aliso 23: 193-203.
25. HUNT, D. 1999. CITES Cactaceae checklist, 2nd ed. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
26. HUNT, D. [ED.]. 2006. The new cactus lexicon, vols. I, II. DH Books, Milborne Port, UK.
27. KATAGIRI, S. 1952. Studies on the chromosome number in certain Cactaceae species. Japanese Journal of Breeding 1: 233-236.
28. KIESLING, R., D. J. FERGUSON, and O. FERRARI. 2001. The first geophytic Lobivia (Cactaceae). Cactus and Succulent Journal 73: 179-186.
29. KIESLING, R., and O. E. FERRARI. 2005. 100 cactus argentinos. Editorial Albatros, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
30. LÖYTYNOJA, A., and N. GOLDMAN. 2005. An algorithm for progressive multiple alignment of sequences with insertions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 10557-10562.
31. LAMBROU, M., and W. TILL. 1993. Zur Karyologie der Gattung Gymnocalycium. Arbeitsgruppe Gymnocalycium 6: 85-88.
32. LAS PEÑAS, M. L., J. D. URDAMPILLETA, G. BERNARDELLO, and E. R. Forni-Martins. 2009. Karyotypes, heterochromatin, and physical mapping of 18S-26S rDNA in Cactaceae. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 124: 72-80.
33. MACHADO, M. C. 2008. What is the role of hybridization in the evolution of the Cactaceae? Bradleya 26: 1-18.
34. MADDISON, D. R., and W. P. MADDISON. 2003. MacClade 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
35. MAUSETH, J. D. 1999. Comparative anatomy of Espostoa, Pseudoespostoa, Thrixanthocereus and Vatricania (Cactaceae). Bradleya 17: 27-37.
36. Negrón-Ortiz, V. 2007. Chromosome numbers, nuclear DNA content, and polyploidy in Consolea (Cactaceae), an endemic cactus of the Caribbean Islands. American Journal of Botany 94: 1360-1370.
37. NYFFELER, R. 2002. Phylogentetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 312-326.
38. NYFFELER, R., and U. EGGLI. 2010. A farewell to dated ideas and concepts-Molecular phylogenetics and a revised suprageneric classification of the family Cactaceae. Schumannia 6: 109-149.
39. Ohi-Toma, T., T. SUGAWARA, H. MURATA, S. WANKE, C. NEINHUIS, and J. MURATA. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of Aristolochia sensu lato (Aristolochiaceae) based on sequences of rbcL, matK, and phyA genes, with special reference to differentiation of chromosome numbers. Systematic Botany 31: 481-492.
40. Ortega-Baes, P., M. SARAVIA, S. SÜHRING, H. Godínez-Alvarez, and M. ZAMAR. 2011. Reproductive biology of Echinopsis terscheckii (Cactaceae): The role of nocturnal and diurnal pollinators. Plant Biology 13 (supplement 1): 33-40.
41. PINKAVA, D. J. 2002. On the evolution of the North America Opuntioideae. In D. Hunt and N. Taylor [eds], Studies in the Opuntioideae, 78-99. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
42. PINKAVA, D. J., M. A. BAKER, B. D. PARFITT, M. W. MOHLENBROCK, and R. D. WORTHINGTON. 1985. Chromosome numbers in some cacti of western North America V. Systematic Botany 10: 471-483.
43. RAUSCH, W. 1985. Lobivia 85. Verlag Rudolf Herzig, Vienna, Austria.
44. REMSKI, M. F. 1954. Cytological investigations in Mammillaria and some associated genera. Botanical Gazette 116: 163-171.
45. RITZ, C. M., L. MARTINS, R. MECKLENBURG, V. GOREMYKIN, and F. H. HELLWIG. 2007. The molecular phylogeny of Rebutia (Cactaceae) and its allies demonstrates the influence of paleogeography on the evolution of South American mountain cacti. American Journal of Botany 94: 1321-1332.
46. ROSS, R. 1981. Chromosome counts, cytology, and reproduction in the Cactaceae. American Journal of Botany 68: 463-470.
47. ROWLEY, G. D. 1994. Spontaneous bigeneric hybrids in Cactaceae. Bradleya 12: 2-7.
48. SAHLEY, C. T. 1996. Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 1329-1336.
49. SATO, D. 1958. Chromosome of the Cactaceae. Succulentarum Japonica 3: 88-91.
50. SCHLUMPBERGER, B. O. 2012. A survey on pollination modes in cacti and a potential key innovation. In S. Patiny [ed.], Evolution of plant-pollinator interactions, 301-319. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
51. SCHLUMPBERGER, B. O., and E. I. BADANO. 2005. Diversity of floral visitors to Echinopsis atacamensis ssp. pasacana (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 11: 18-26.
52. SCHLUMPBERGER, B. O., A. A. COCUCCI, M. MORÉ, A. N. SÉRSIC, and R. A. RAGUSO. 2009. Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactus. Annals of Botany 103: 1489-1500.
53. SCHLUMPBERGER, B. O., and R. A. RAGUSO. 2008. Geographic variation in floral scent of Echinopsis ancistrophora (Cactaceae): Evidence for constraints on hawkmoth attraction. Oikos 117: 801-814.
54. SCHUMANN, K. 1899. Gesamtbeschreibung der Kakteen (Monographia Cactacearum). Neumann, Neudamm, Germany.
55. SPEGAZZINI, C. 1921. Plantas nuevos o interesantes. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 92: 77-123.
56. SPEGAZZINI, C. 1923. Breves notas cactológicas. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 96: 61-146.
57. STAMATAKIS, A., P. HOOVER, and J. ROUGEMONT. 2008. A rapid boot-strap algorithm for the RAxML webservers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
58. TABERLET, P., L. GIELLY, G. PAUTOU, and J. BOUVET. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
59. TIMME, R. E., B. B. SIMPSON, and C. R. LINDER. 2007. High-resolution phylogeny for Helianthus (Asteraceae) using the 18S-26S ribosomal DNA external transcribed spacer. American Journal of Botany 94: 1837-1852.
60. WALTER, H. 2010. Floral biology of Echinopsis chiloensis ssp. chiloensis (Cactaceae): Evidence for a mixed pollination syndrome. Flora 205: 757-763.