Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledoneae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-61

  Hernández Hernández, Tania ^a   Hernández, Héctor M ^a   Arturo De Nova, J ^a   Puente, Raul ^b   Eguiarte, Luis E ^c   Magallón, Susana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b NONE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cactoideae; Opuntioideae; Pachycereeae; Parsimony ratchet; Ppc; RAxML; Rpl16; Trichocereeae; TrnK matK; TrnL trnF

Indexed keywords

ARID REGION; CACTUS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GROWTH FORM; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

BLOSSFELDIA; CACTACEAE; CACTEAE; CACTOIDEAE; CARYOPHYLLALES; OPUNTIOIDEAE; PACHYCEREEAE; PERESKIOIDEAE; TRICHOCEREEAE;

EID: 78651070818     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000129     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Anderson, E. F. 2001. The cactus family. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
2. Applequist, W. L., and R. S. Wallace. 2001. Phylogeny of the Portulacaceous cohort based on ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 26: 406-419.
3. Applequist, W. L., and R. S. Wallace. 2002. Deletions in the plastid trnT-trnL intergenic spacer define clades within Cactaceae subfamily Cactoideae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 231: 153-162.
4. Arias, S., T. Gama, and L. U. Guzmán. 1997. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán- Cuicatl á n, Fasc í culo 14. Cactaceae A.L. Juss. Instituto de Biolog í a, Universidad Nacional Aut ó noma de M é xico, M é xico, D.F., Mexico.
5. Arias, S., and T. Terrazas. 2006. An á lisis clad í stico del g é nero Pachycereus (Cactaceae) con caracteres morfológicos. Brittonia 58: 197-216.
6. Arias, S., T. Terrazas, H. J. Arreola-Nava, M. Vázquez-Sánchez, and K. M. Cameron. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships in Peniocereus (Cactaceae) inferred from plastid DNA sequence data. Journal of Plant Research 118: 317-328.
7. Arias, S., T. Terrazas, and K. M. Cameron. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 28: 547-557.
8. Barthlott, W., and D.R. Hunt. 1993. Cactaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
9. Barthlott, W., and G. Voit. 1979. Mikromorphologie der Samenschalen und Taxonomie der Cactaceae: Ein raster-elektronenmikroskopischer Überblick. Plant Systematics and Evolution 132: 205-229.
10. Britton, N. L., and J. N. Rose. 1919-1923. The Cactaceae, 4 vols. Carnegie Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
11. Butterworth, C. A. 2006. Resolving "Nyffeler' s puzzle" - The intriguing taxonomic position of Blossfeldia. Haseltonia 12: 3-10.
12. Butterworth, C. A., J. H. Cota-Sánchez, and R. S. Wallace. 2002. Molecular systematics of tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae: Cactoideae): A phylogeny based on rpl16 intron sequence variation. Systematic Botany 27: 257-270.
13. Butterworth, C. A., and R. S. Wallace. 2004. Phylogenetic studies of Mammillaria (Cactaceae) - Insights from chloroplast sequence variation and hypothesis testing using the parametric bootstrap. American Journal of Botany 91: 1086-1098.
14. Butterworth, C. A., and R. S. Wallace. 2005. Molecular phylogenetics of the leafy cactus genus Pereskia (Cactaceae). Systematic Botany 30: 800-808.
15. Buxbaum, F. 1951. Morphology of cacti, section I. Roots and stems. Abbey Garden Press, Pasadena, California, USA.
16. Buxbaum, F. 1958. The phylogenetic division of the subfamily Cereoideae, Cactaceae. Madro ñ o 14: 177-216.
17. Buxbaum, F. 1969. Die entwicklungswege der Kakteen in Sudamerika. In E. J. Fittkau, J. Illies, H. Klineg, G. H. Schwabe, and H. Sioli [eds.], Biogeography and ecology in South America, 583-623. W. Junk, The Hauge, Netherlands.
18. Cantino, P. D., J. A. Doyle, S. W. Graham, W. S. Judd, R. G. Olmstead, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. J. Donoghue. 2007. Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56: 822-846.
19. Crozier, B. 2004. Subfamilies of Cactaceae Juss., including Blossfeldioideae subfam. nov. Phytologia 86: 52-64.
20. Cuénoud, P., V. Savolainen, L. W. Chatrou, M. Powell, R. J. Grayer, and w. Chase. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB and matK DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 132-144.
21. De Kock, G. C. 2001. The use of Opuntia as a fodder source in arid areas of southern Africa. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 169: 101-105.
22. Downie, S. R., and J. D. Palmer. 1994. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Caryophyllales based on structural and inverted repeat restriction site variation. Systematic Botany 19: 236-252.
23. Drezner, T. D., and R. C. Balling Jr. 2002. Climatic controls of saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea) regeneration: A potential link with El Ni ñ o. Physical Geography 23: 465-475.
24. Edgar, R. C. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797.
25. Edwards, E. J., R. Nyffeler, and M. J. Donoghue. 2005. Basal cactus phylogeny: Implications of Pereskia (Cactacae) paraphyly for the transition to the cactus life form. American Journal of Botany 92: 1177-1188.
26. Eggli, U., and R. Nyffeler 1998. Proposal to conserve the name Parodia against Frailea (Cactaceae). Taxon 47: 475-476.
27. Eggli, U., and R. Nyffeler. 2007. Parodia allosiphon (Marchesi) N.P. Taylor (Cactaceae-Cactoideae) - A cladistically 'basal' species with a restricted distribution range (Notes towards a checklist of Cactaceae of Uruguay, 2). Bradleya 25: 37-44.
28. Endler, J., and F. Buxbaum. 1982. Die Pflanzenfamilie der Kakteen. 3rd ed. Lehrmeister-B ü cherei Nr. 872, Alberch Philler, Minden, Germany.
29. Ferguson, D. J. 1991. In defense of the genus Glandulicactus Backeb. Cactus and Succulent Journal 63: 87-91.
30. Feugang, J. M., P. Konarski, D. Zou, F. C. Stintzing, and C. Zou. 2006. Nutritional and medicinal use of Cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) cladodes and fruits. Frontiers in Bioscience 11 (suppl. 2): 2574-2589.
31. Gibson, A. C. 1982. Phylogenetic relationships of Pachycereeae. In J. S. F. Barker and W. T. Stramer [eds.], Ecological genetics and evolution: The cactus-yeast-Drosophila model system, 3-16. Academic Press, Sydney, Australia.
32. Gibson, A. C., and K. E. Horak. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phylogeny of Mexican columnar cacti. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 65: 999-1057.
33. Gibson, A. C., and P. S. Nobel. 1986. The cactus primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
34. Godínez-Álvarez, H., T. Valverde, and P. Ortega-Baes. 2003. Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. Botanical Review 69: 173-203.
35. Goloboff, P., S. Farris, and K. C. Nixon. 2000. TNT (Tree analysis using New Technology) (beta) [computer program]. Published by the authors, Tucum á n, Argentina.
36. Gómez-Hinostrosa, C., and H. M. Hern á ndez. 2005. A new combination in Peniocereus (Cactaceae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76: 129-135.
37. Gorelick, R. 2004. Resolving the phylogenetic placement of Blossfeldia liliputana (Cactaceae): Reticulate evolution, chloroplast inheritance, and graft-chimeras. Bradleya 22: 9-14.
38. Griffith, M. P., and J. M. Porter. 2009. Phylogeny of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 107-116.
39. Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
40. Hernández, H. M., and C. Gómez-Hinostrosa. 2005. Cactus diversity and endemism in the Chihuahuan Desert Region. In J. L. Cartron, R. Felger, and G. Ceballos [eds.], Biodiversity and conservation in northern Mexico, 264-275. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
41. Hernández, H. M., C. Gómez-Hinostrosa, and R. Bárcenas. 2001. Diversity, spatial arrangement, and endemism of Cactaceae in the Huizache area, a hot-spot in the Chihuahuan Desert. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1097-1112.
42. Hordijk, W., and O. Gascuel. 2005. Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics 21: 4338-4347.
43. Hunt, D. 1999. CITES Cactaceae checklist, 2nd ed. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and International Organization for Succulent Plant Study, London, UK.
44. Hunt, D., N. P. Taylor, and G. Charles. 2006. The new cactus lexicon. dh Books, Milborne Port, UK.
45. Kattermann, F. 1994. Eriosyce (Cactaceae). The genus revised and amplify ed. In D. Hunt and N. Taylor [eds.], Succulent plant research, vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
46. Kiesling, R., and J. Mauseth. 2000. History and taxonomy of Neoraimondia herzogiana (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 7: 47-52.
47. Leuenberger, B. E. 1976. Die pollenmorphologie der Cactaceae und ihre bedeutung fur die systematik. Dissertationes Botanicae 31: 1-321.
48. Leuenberger, B. E. 1986. Pereskia (Cactaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 41.
49. Leuenberger, B. E. 1997. Maihuenia: Monograph of a Patagonian genus of Cactaceae. Reprint of Botanische Jahrbucher f ü r Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 119
50. Leuenberger, B. E., and U. Eggli. 2000. The genus Eulychnia (Cactaceae) in Chile: Notes on the taxonomy, types, and other old specimens. Haseltonia 7: 63-76.
51. Loup, C. 1983. Premi è res donn é es sur l' architecture des Cactaceae. Dipl ô me d' etudes, Universit é des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier, France.
52. Mandujano, M. D. C., C. Montaña, and L. E. Eguiarte. 1996. Reproductive ecology and inbreeding depression in Opuntia rastrera (Cactaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert: Why are sexually derived recruitments so rare? American Journal of Botany 83: 63-70.
53. Mauseth, J., and R. Kiesling. 1998. Comparative anatomy of Neoraimondia roseiflora and Neocardenasia herzogiana (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 5: 37-50.
54. Mauseth, J. D. 1999. Anatomical adaptations to xeric conditions in Maihuenia (Cactaceae), a relictual, leaf-bearing cactus. Journal of Plant Research 112: 307-315.
55. Mauseth, J. D. 2004. Wide-band tracheids are present in almost all species of Cactaceae. Journal of Plant Research 117: 69-76.
56. Mauseth, J. D. 2006. Structure-function relationships in highly modify ed shoots of Cactaceae. Annals of Botany 98: 901-926.
57. Mauseth, J. D. 2007. Tiny but complex foliage leaves occur in many "leafless" cacti (Cactaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 168: 845-853.
58. Mauseth, J. D., and J. V. Landrum. 1997. Relictual vegetative anatomical characters in Cactaceae: The genus Pereskia. Journal of Plant Research 110: 55-64.
59. Metzing, D., and R. Kiesling. 2008. The study of cactus evolution: The pre-DNA era. Haseltonia 14: 6-25.
60. Nixon, K. C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
61. Nobel, P. S. 1994. Remarkable agaves and cacti. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
62. Nobel, P. S. 2002. Cacti: biology and uses. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
63. Nyffeler, R. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 312-326.
64. Nyffeler, R. 2007. The closest relatives of cacti: Insights from phylogenetic analyses of chloroplast and mitochondrial sequences with special emphasis on relationships in the tribe Anacampseroteae. American Journal of Botany 94: 89-101.
65. Nyffeler, R., and U. Eggli. 2010. Disintegrating Portulacaceae- A new familial classification of the suborder Portulacineae (Caryophyllales) based on molecular and morphological investigations. Taxon 59: 227-240.
66. Olson, M. E. 2002. Combining data from DNA sequences and morphology for a phylogeny of Moringaceae (Brassicales). Systematic Botany 27: 55-73.
67. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: A general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Boiological Sciences 255:37-45.
68. Pagel, M. 1999. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 48: 612-622.
69. Pagel, M., A. Meade, and D. Barker. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53: 673-684.
70. Parker, K. C. 1989. Nurse plant relationships of columnar cacti in Arizona. Physical Geography 10: 322-335.
71. Porter, J. M. 1999. Sclerocactus and Pediocactus: A summary of the molecular evidence. Cactus Consensus Initiatives 7: 5-6.
72. Porter, J. M., M. S. Kinney,and K. D. Heil. 2000. Relationships between Sclerocactus and Toumeya (Cactaceae) based on chloroplast trnL-trnF sequences. Haseltonia 7: 8-23.
73. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatic 14: 817-818.
74. Ritz, M. C., L. Martins, R. Mecklenburg, V. Goremykin, and F. H. Hellwig. 2007. The molecular phylogeny of Rebutia (Cactaceae) and its allies demonstrates the influence of paleogeography on the evolution of South American mountain cacti. American Journal of Botany 94: 1321-1332.
75. Schulz, R., and A. Kapitany. 1994. Copiapoa in their environment, Cha ñ aral to El Cobre. Southbank Book, Melbourne, Australia.
76. Shishkova, S., T. L. Rost, and J. G. Dubrovsky. 2008. Determinate root growth and meristem maintenance in angiosperms. Annals of Botany 101: 319-340.
77. Sikes, D. S., and P. O. Lewis. 2001. Beta software, version 1. PAUPRat: PAUP* implementation of the parsimony ratchet [computer program]. Distributed by the authors, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
78. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
79. Stintzing, F. C., and R. Carle. 2005. Cactus stems (Opuntia spp.): A review on their chemistry, technology, and uses. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 49: 175-194.
80. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10 for Macintosh and 4.0b10 for UNIX. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
81. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly,G. Pautou,and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplify cation of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molecular Biology 17: 1105-1109.
82. Taylor, N.,and D. Zappi. 2004. Cacti of eastern Brazil. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
83. Terrazas, T.,and S. Arias. 2003. Comparative stem anatomy in the subfamily Cactoideae. Botanical Review 68: 444-473.
84. Wallace, R. S. 1995a. A family-wide phylogeny, subfamilial and tribal relationships, and suggestions for taxonomic realignments. IOS Bulletin 6: 13.
85. Wallace, R. S. 1995b. Molecular systematic study of the Cactaceae: Using chloroplast DNA variation to elucidate cactus phylogeny. Bradleya 13: 1-12.
86. Wallace, R. S. 2002. The phylogeny and systematics of columnar cacti: An overview. In T. H. Fleming, and A. Valiente-Banuet [eds.], Columnar cacti and their mutualists: Evolution, ecology and conservation. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
87. Wallace, R. S., and J. H. Cota. 1996. An intron loss in the chloroplast gene rpoC1 supports a monophyletic origin of the subfamily Cactoideae of the Cactaceae. Current Genetics 29: 275-281.
88. Wallace, R. S., and S. L. Dickie. 2002. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA sequence variation in subfam. Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). Succulent Plant Research 6: 9-24.
89. Wallace, R. S., and A. C. Gibson. 2002. Evolution and systematics. In P. S. Nobel [ed.], Cacti, biology and uses. University of California Press, Los Angeles, California, USA.