Cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) and seismic intensity based on the PEER-NGA database

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 457-485

  Campbell, Kenneth W ^a   Bozorgnia, Yousef ^b  

^a EQECAT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURES; CUMULATIVE ABSOLUTE VELOCITIES; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGES; GENERAL CLASS; GROUND MOTIONS; JAPAN METEOROLOGICAL AGENCIES; MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; SEISMIC INTENSITY;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; DATABASE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GROUND MOTION; SEISMICITY; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84865007283     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000012     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., and Youngs, R. R., 1992. A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82, 505-510.
2. Akkar, S., and Özen, Ö., 2005. Effect of peak ground velocity on deformation demands for SDOF systems, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 1551-1571. (Pubitemid 41522547)
3. Aoi, S., Kunugi, T., and Fujiwara, H., 2004. Strong-motion seismograph network operated by NIED: K-Net and KiK-Net, J. Japan Assoc. Earthq. Eng. 4, 65-74.
4. Arias, A., 1970. A measure of earthquake intensity, in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants (Hansen, R. J., ed.), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 438-483.
5. Atkinson, G. M., and Kaka, S. I., 2007. Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 497-510.
6. Atkinson, G. M., and Sonley, E., 2000. Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 537-544. (Pubitemid 30391107)
7. Bozorgnia, Y., Hachem, M. M., and Campbell, K. W., 2010. Ground motion prediction equation ("attenuation relationship") for inelastic response spectra, Earthquake Spectra 26, 1-23.
8. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2009. NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA P-750), 2009 edition, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.
9. Cabañas, L., Benito, B., and Herráiz, M., 1997. An approach to the measurement of the potential structural damage of earthquake ground motions, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 79-92.
10. Campbell, K. W., 1986. An empirical estimate of near-source ground motion for a major, mb 6.8, earthquake in the eastern United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 76, 1-17.
11. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2007. Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, PEER 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
12. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2008. NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD, and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s, Earthquake Spectra 24, 139-171.
13. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2010a. Analysis of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) and JMA Instrumental Seismic Intensity (IJMA) Using the PEER-NGA Strong Motion Database, PEER 2010/102, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
14. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2010b. A ground motion prediction equation for the horizontal component of cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) using the PEER-NGA database, Earthquake Spectra 26, 635-650.
15. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2011a. A ground motion prediction equation for JMA instrumental seismic intensity for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regimes, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40, 413-427.
16. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2011b. Predictive equations for the standardized version of cumulative absolute velocity as adapted for use in the shutdown of U.S. nuclear power plants, Nucl. Eng. Des. 241, 2558-2569.
17. Campbell, K. W., and Bozorgnia, Y., 2011c. A comparison of ground motion prediction equations for Arias intensity and cumulative absolute velocity developed using a consistent database and function form, Earthquake Spectra, accepted for publication.
18. Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W., 2008. NGA project strong-motion database, Earthquake Spectra 24, 23-44.
19. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Lawrence Erbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Danciu, L., and Tselentis, G., 2007. Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97, 162-183.
21. Davenport, P. N., 2003. Instrumental measures of earthquake intensity in New Zealand, Paper 071, 7th Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 13-15 February 2003, Christchurch, New Zealand.
22. Dengler, L. A., and Dewey, J. W., 1998. An intensity survey of households affected by the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January 1994, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 88, 441-462.
23. Dewey, J. W., Reagor, B. G., Dengler, L., and Moley, K., 1995. Intensity distribution and isoseismal maps for the Northridge, California, earthquake of January 17, 1994, U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report 95-92, Reston, VA.
24. Earthquake Research Committee, 1998. Seismic Activity in Japan, Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, Prime Minister's Office, Government of Japan, Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo.
25. Ebel, J. E., andWald, D. J., 2003. Bayesian estimations of peak ground acceleration and5%damped spectral acceleration from modified Mercalli intensity data, Earthquake Spectra 19, 511-529.
26. Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1988. A Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake, EPRI NP-5930, Palo Alto, CA.
27. Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1991. Standardization of the Cumulative Absolute Velocity, EPRI TR-100082-T2, Palo Alto, CA.
28. Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI), 2006. Program on Technology Innovation: Use of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) in Determining Effects of Small Magnitude Earthquakes on Seismic Hazard Analyses, EPRI 1014099, Palo Alto, CA.
29. Faenza, L., and Michelini, A., 2010. Regression analysis of MCS intensity and ground motion parameters in Italy and its application in ShakeMap, Geophys. J. Int. 180, 1138-1152.
30. Fraser, W. A., Wald, D. J., and Lin, K. W., 2008. Using ShakeMaps and ShakeCast to prioritize post-earthquake dam inspections, in Proc., 4th Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference, Sacramento, CA, American Society of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Special Publication 181, 1-10.
31. Grünthal, G. (ed.), 1998. European Macroseismic Scale 1998, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Conseil de l'Europe, Luxembourg.
32. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), 1996. On Seismic Intensity, Gyosei, Tokyo, 46-224 (in Japanese).
33. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), 2011. Tables Explaining the JMA Seismic Intensity Scale, http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/inttable.pdf, accessed December 2011.
34. Kostov, M., 2005. Site-specific estimation of cumulative absolute velocity, in Proc., 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18), Beijing, 3041-3050.
35. Kramer, S. L., and Mitchell, R. A., 2006. Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation, Earthquake Spectra 22, 413-438. (Pubitemid 43984329)
36. Musson, R. M. W., Grünthal, G., and Stucchi, M., 2010. The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales, J. Seismol. 14, 413-428.
37. Power, M., Chiou, B., Abrahamson, N., Bozorgnia, Y., Shantz, T., and Roblee, C., 2008. An overview of the NGA project, Earthquake Spectra 24, 3-21.
38. Reed, J. W., and Kassawara, R. P., 1990. A criterion for determining exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake, Nucl. Eng. Des. 123, 387-396.
39. Richter, C. F., 1958. Elementary Seismology, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
40. Shabestari, K. T., and Yamazaki, F., 2001. A proposal of instrumental seismic intensity scale compatible with MMI evaluated from three-component acceleration records, Earthq. Spectra 17, 711-723. (Pubitemid 34149281)
41. Sokolov, V. Y., 2002. Seismic intensity and Fourier acceleration spectra: Revised relationship, Earthquake Spectra 18, 161-187. (Pubitemid 34720646)
42. Sokolov, V. Y., and Chernov, Y. K., 1998. On the correlation of seismic intensity with Fourier amplitude spectra, Earthquake Spectra 14, 679-694. (Pubitemid 128625640)
43. Sokolov, V., and Furumura, T., 2008. Comparative analysis of two methods for instrumental intensity estimations using the database accumulated during recent large earthquakes in Japan, Earthquake Spectra 24, 513-532.
44. Sokolov, V., and Wald, D. J., 2002. Instrumental intensity distribution for the Hector Mine, California, and the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquakes: Comparison of two methods, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2145-2162. (Pubitemid 36000107)
45. Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G., 1975. On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65, 139-162.
46. Tselentis, G. A., and Danciu, L., 2008. Empirical relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and engineering ground-motion parameters in Greece, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98, 1863-1875.
47. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2000. The Severity of an Earthquake, General Interest Publication, Reston, VA, 15 pp., http://pubs/usgs.gov/gip/ earthq4/severitygip.htlm.
48. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC), 1997. Pre-earthquake Planning and Immediate Nuclear Power Plant Operator Postearthquake Actions, Regulatory Guide 1.166, Washington, D.C.
49. Wald, D. J., Dengler, L. A., and Dewey, J. W., 1999a. Utilization of the Internet for rapid community intensity maps, Seismol. Res. Lett. 70, 680-697.
50. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., and Kanamori, H., 1999b. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity and modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthquake Spectra 15, 557-564.
51. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., Kanamori, H., Serivner, V. W., and Worden, C. B., 1999c. TriNet "ShakeMaps": Rapid generation of instrumental ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California, Earthquake Spectra 15, 537-555.
52. Wald, D. J., Lin, K., Worden, B., and Turner, L., 2006. ShakeCast: Facilitating the use of ShakeMap for post-earthquake decision-making and response within Caltrans and other critical lifeline communities, Paper A22, 5th National Seismic Conference on Bridges & Highways, 18-20 September 2006, San Mateo, CA, MCEER-06-SP09, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
53. Wald, D., Lin, K. W., and Porter, K., 2008. ShakeCast: Automating and improving the use of ShakeMap for post-earthquake decision-making and response, Earthquake Spectra 24, 533-553.
54. Wood, H. O., and Neumann, F., 1931. Modified Mercalli intensity scale of 1931, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 21, 277-283.