ShakeCast: Automating and improving the use of shakemap for post-earthquake deeision-making and response

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 533-553

  Wald, David ^a   Lin, Kuo Wan ^a   Porter, Keith ^b   Turner, Loren ^c  

^a DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MANAGERS;

EARTHQUAKE SHAKING; EMERGENCY RESPONDERS; EMERGENCY RESPONSE; HIERARCHICAL LIST; INTENSITY MEASURE; PUBLIC INFORMATION; SITUATIONAL AWARENESS; SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY;

EMERGENCY SERVICES;

DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 49049084304     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2923924     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Basoz, N., and Mander, J., 1999. Enhancement of the Highway Transportation and Lifeline Module in HAZUS, National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) Report.
2. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2002. CALTRANS SMART 2.0 Users Manual, Caltrans Internal Report, 152 pp.
3. Fraser, W. A., Wald, D. J., and Lin, K.-W., 2007. Using ShakeMap and ShakeCast to Prioritize Post-Earthquake Dam Inspections, Proceedings of the Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Conference IV, Sacramento, CA.
4. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1997. Uniform Building Code, Whittier, CA.
5. Lin, K.-W., and Wald, D. J., 2007. ShakeCast Users Manual, USGS Open File Report 2008-1158, 90 pp.
6. Lin, K. W., Wald, D. J., Worden, B., and Shakal, A. F., 2005. Quantifying ShakeMap Uncertainty, CSMIP'05 Seminar on the Utilization of Strong Motion Data, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program User's Workshop, Proceedings, Los Angeles, CA., pp. 37-49.
7. Luco, N., and Karaca, E., 2007. Extending the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps and ShakeMaps to probabilistic building damage and risk maps, Proceedings of the 10th Int'l Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
8. MH Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 690 pp.
9. Ranf, R. T., Eberhard, M. O., and Malone, S., 2007. Post-earthquake prioritization of bridge inspections, Earthquake Spectra 23, 131-146.
10. U.S. Department of Transportation USDOT, Federal Highway Administration, 2005. National Bridge Inventory, Washington, D.C.
11. Wald, D. J., Worden, B. C., Quitoriano, V., and Pankow, K. L., 2005. ShakeMap Manual: Users Guide, Technical Manual, and Software Guide, USGS Techniques and Methods 12-A1,128 pp. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/ 2005/12A01/
12. Wald, D. J., Naecker, P., Roblee, C., and Turner, L., 2003. Development of a ShakeMap-based, earthquake response system within Caltrans, 2003, in Advancing Mitigation Technologies and Disaster Response for Lifeline Systems, J. Beavers, Ed., Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Monograph No. 25, August 2003, ASCE.
13. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, v., Heaton, T. H., and Kanamori, H., 1999a. Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California, Earthquake Spectra 15, 557-564.
14. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., Kanamori, H., Scrivner, C. W., and Worden, C. B., 1999b. TriNet 'ShakeMaps': Rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California, Earthquake Spectra 15, 537-555.
15. Wills, C. J., Petersen, M. D., Bryant, W. A., Reichle, M. S., Saucedo, G. J., Tan, S. S., Taylor, G. C., and Treiman, J. A., 2000. A site-conditions map for California based on geology and shear wave velocity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, S187-S208.