Ground motion intensity measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 413-438

  Kramer, Steven L ^a   Mitchell, Robert A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Shannon and Wilson Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; HAZARDS; SOIL LIQUEFACTION;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION INTENSITY; LIQUEFACTION HAZARD;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; LIQUEFACTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; PORE PRESSURE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SOIL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745588288     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2194970     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abrahamson, N. A., and Silva, W. J., 1997. Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68, 94-127.
2. Abrahamson, N. A., and Youngs, R. R., 1992. A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 82 (1), 505-510.
3. Ambraseys, N. N., 1988. Engineering seismology, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 17 (1), 1-105.
4. Andrus, R. D., and Stokoe, K. H. II, 1997. Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity, Proceedings, NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, pp. 89-128.
5. Arango, I., 1996. Magnitude scaling factors for soil liquefaction evaluations, J. Geotech. Eng. 122 (11), 929-936.
6. Arias, A., 1970. A measure of earthquake intensity, Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants edited by R. J. Hansen, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 438-483.
7. Baska, D. A., 2002. An Analytical/Empirical Model for Prediction of Lateral Spread Displacements, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 539 pp.
8. Bazzurro, P., 1998. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 329 pp.
9. Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., 1970. Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 684 pp.
10. Benjamin and Associates, 1988. A Criterion for Determining Exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake, EPRI Report NP-5930, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
11. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W B., and Fumal, T. E., 1997. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work, Seismol. Res. Lett. 68 (1), 128-153.
12. Building Seismic Safety Council, 1998. 1997 Edition NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA-302), issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 337 pp.
13. Cornell, C. A., and Krawinkler, H., 2000. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, PEER News, April, pp. 1-3.
14. Deierlein, G. G., Krawinkler, H., and Cornell, C. A., 2003. A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering, Proceedings, 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
15. Dobry, R., and Ladd, R. S., 1980. Discussion to "Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes," by H. B. Seed, J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 106 (GT6), 720-724.
16. Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., and Powell, D., 1982. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method, NBS Building Science Series 138, National Bureau of Standards, 150 pp.
17. Horne, J. C., 1996. Effects of Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading on Pile Foundations, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 371 pp.
18. Insightful Corporation, 2001. S-PLUS version 6.1, Seattle, WA.
19. Kayen, R. E., and Mitchell, J. K., 1997. Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123, 1162-1174.
20. Kramer, S. L., and Arduino, P., 1999. Constitutive modeling of cyclic mobility and implications for site response, Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, Vol. 3, pp. 1029-1034.
21. Krawinkler, H., 2002. A general approach to seismic performance assessment, Proceedings, International Conference on Advances and New Challenges in Earthquake Engineering Research (ICANCEER), Hong Kong.
22. Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A., 2001. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions, Earthquake Spectra (submitted).
23. Martin, G. R., Finn, W. D. L., and Seed, H. B., 1975. Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading, J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 101 (GT5), 423-438.
24. Paciello, A., Rinaldis, D., and Romeo, R., 2000. Incorporating ground motion parameters related to earthquake damage and to seismic hazard analysis, Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Seismic Zonation: Managing Earthquake Risk in the 21st Century, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
25. Pinheiro, J. C., and Bates, D. M., 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus, Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 528 pp.
26. Pyke, R. M., 1979. Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings, J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 105 (GT6), 715-726.
27. Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E., 1998. Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test, Can, Geotech. J. 35 (3), 442-459.
28. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., 1970. Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses, Report No. EERC 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
29. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., 1971. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 107 (SM9), 1249-1274.
30. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., 1982. Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA, 134 pp.
31. Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., Makdisi, F., and Banerjee, N., 1975. Representation qf Irregular Stress Time Histories by Equivalent Uniform Stress Series in Liquefaction Analyses, Report No. EERC 75-29, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
32. Seed, H. B., and Silver, M. L., 1972 Settlement of dry sands during earthquakes, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (SM4), 381-397.
33. Shome, N., and Cornell, C. A., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, Reliability of Marine Structures Program Report No. RMS-35, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
34. Travasarou, T., Bray, J. D., and Abrahamson, N. A., 2003. Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias intensity, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 1133-1155.
35. Youd, T. L., 1972. Compaction of sands by repeated shear straining, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (SM7), 709-725.
36. Youd, T. L., Idriss, I. M., Andrus, R. D., Arango, L, Castro, G., Christian, J. T., Dobry, R., Finn, W. D. J., Harder, L. F, Hynes, M. E., Ishihara, K., Koester, J. P, Liao, S. C., Marcuson, W. F., Martin, G. R., Mitchell, J. K., Moriwaki, Y., Power, M. S., Robertson, P K., Seed, R. B., and Stokoe, K. H., 2001. Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10), 817-833.
37. Youd, T. L., and Noble, S. K., 1997. Magnitude scaling factors, Proceedings, NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, pp. 149-165.