On the correlation of seismic intensity with fourier amplitude spectra

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 679-694

  Sokolov, V Yu ^a   Chernov, Yu K ^b  

^a Lenhydroprojekt   (Russian Federation)

^b SK IGC   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC WAVE; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ARMENIA [WEST ASIA]; CALIFORNIA; COALINGA; SPITAK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0000507317     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586022     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aki, K., 1987, Strong motion seismology, Strong Ground Motion Seismology, M. Erdic and M. Toksöz, Editors, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 3-40.
2. Ambraseys, N.N., 1973, Dynamics and response of foundation materials in epicentral regions of strong earthquakes, Proc. 5th World Conf. on Earthq. Eng., Rome, 1, CXXVI-CXLVIII.
3. Ambraseys, N. N., and Jackson, J. A., 1981, Earthquake hazard and vulnerability in the north eastern Mediterranean: the Corinth earthquake sequence of February-March 1981, Disasters, 5, N 4, 355-368.
4. Aptikaev, F. F., 1981, On the correlation of MM-intensity with parameters of ground shaking. Proc. VII Conf. EACC, Athens, 117-126.
5. Aptikaev, F. F., and Shebalin, N. V., 1988, The correlation between macroseismic effects and dynamic parameters of ground motion, Investigations of seismic hazard (Engineering seismology problems, iss. 29), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 98-108 (in Russian).
6. Atkinson, G. M., 1993, Earthquake source spectra in Eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 83, 1778-1798.
7. Atkinson, G. M., and Boore, D. M., 1995, Ground motion relations for eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 85, 17-30.
8. Atkinson, G. M., and Suva W., 1997, An empirical study of earthquake source spectra for California earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 97-113.
9. Barosh, P. J., 1969, Use of seismic intensity data to predict the effects of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions in various geological settings, US Geol. Survey Bull., 1279.
10. Boatwright, J., Seekins, L. C., Fumal, T. E., Hsi-Ping Liu, and Mueller, G. S., 1991, Ground motion amplification in the Marina district, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81, 1980-1997.
11. Boore, D. M., 1983, Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions, based on seismological model of the radiated spectra, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. ,73, 1865-1894.
12. Boore, D. M., 1989, Quantative ground motion estimations, Earthquake hazard and the design of constructed facilities in the Eastern United States, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 558, New York.
13. Boore, D. M., and Atkinson, G. M., 1987, Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 77, 440-467.
14. Boore, D. M., and Atkinson, G. M., 1992, Source spectra for the 1988 Saguenay, Quebec earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82, 683-719.
15. Boore, D. M., and Joyner, W. B., 1997, Site amplifications for generic rock sites, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 87, 327-341.
16. Bubnov, S., 1979, Impact of the Montenegro Earthquake on buildings, Gradbeni Vestnik, Ljubljana, 28, 182-192.
17. Chernov, Yu. K., 1984, Strong ground motion spectra in earthquake near-field zone, Prediction of seismic influence (Engineering Seismology problems, iss. 25), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 16-28 (in Russian).
18. Chernov, Yu. K., and Sokolov, V. Yu., 1983, Relations between ground motion parameters and felt intensity. Seismic hazard assessment (Engineering seismology problems, iss. 24), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 96-111, (in Russian).
19. Chernov, Yu. K., and Sokolov, V. Yu., 1996, Probabilistic assessments of the seismic hazard in northern Armenia (Spitak region), Earthquake Spectra, 12, 199-216.
20. Chernov, Yu. K., Sokolov, V. Yu, and Serebryakova, E. V., 1989, The quantitative estimation of the seismic hazard in terms of engineering parameters of the seismic vibration and intensity of shaking, Proc. 4th Intern. Symp. Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, Bechyne Castle, Czechoslovakia, September 4-9, vol. II, 462-469.
21. Darragh, R. B., and Shakal, A. F., 1991, The site response of two rock and soil station pairs to strong and weak ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 81, 1885-1899.
22. Denham, D., and Smith W., 1993, Earthquake hazard assessment in the Australian Southwest Pacific Region. A review of the status quo, Annali di Geofisica, XXXVI, N 3-4, 27-39.
23. Dowrick, D. J., 1983, An earthquake catastrophe model with particular reference to central New Zealand, Bull. NZ Nat. Soc. for Earthq. Eng., 16, N 4, 213-221.
24. Evernden, J. F., Kohler, W. M., and Glow, G. D., 1991, Seismic intensities of earthquakes of conterminous United States - their prediction and interpretation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Profess. Papers, 1223, Washington.
25. Gupta, I. M., 1980, A note of correlation of Modified Mercalli Intensity with peaks of far-field ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 70, 925-932.
26. Hanks, C., and Brady, A. G., 1991, The Loma Prieta earthquake, ground motion and damage in Oakland, Treasure Island, and San Francisco, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 81, 2019-2047.
27. Irikiura, K., Iwata, T., Sekiguchi, H. and Pitarka, A., 1996, Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake: why were such destructive motions generated to buildings? Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 17, N 2, 99-127.
28. Kawase, H., 1996, The cause of the Damage Belt in Kobe: "the basin edge effect," constructive interference of the direct S-wave with the basin-induced diffracted/Rayleigh waves, Seis. Res. Let., 67, N 5, 25-34.
29. Krinitzsky, E. L., and Marcuson, W. F., 1983, Principles for selecting earthquake motions in engineering design, Bull. Ass. of Eng. Geol., XX, 253-265.
30. Medvedev, S. V., 1965, Elementary seismology, Israel program for scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
31. Molotkov, C. G., 1987, Spectral content and polarization of strong ground motions due to Kamchatka Earthquakes occuring 1983-1985, Strong earthquakes and seismic influence (Engineering Seismology problems, iss. 28), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 209-227, (in Russian).
32. Murphy, J. R., and O'Brien, J. L., 1977, The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 67, 877-915.
33. Nazarov, A. G., and Shebalin, N. V. (Editors), 1975. Seismic scale and the methods of seismic intensity measuring. Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 280 pp. (in Russian).
34. North, R. G., Wetmiller, R. J., Adams, J., Anglin, F. M., Hasegawa, H. S., Lamontage, M., Du Berger, R., Seeber, L., and Armbruster, J. 1989. Preliminary results from the November 25, 1988 Saguenay (Quebec) earthquake. Seism. Res. Let., 60, N 3, 89-93.
35. Ohta, Y., and Ohashi, H., 1987, Seismic intensity and its application to engineering: a study in Japan, Strong Ground Motion Seismology, M. Erdic and M. N. Toksöz, Editors, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 369-384.
36. Ohta, Y., Ohashi, H., Ergünay, O., and Tabban, A., 1987, Seismic intensity and its application to engineering: a study in Turkey, Strong Ground Motion Seismology, M. Erdic and M. N. Toksöz, Editors, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 385-401.
37. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on the Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, 1989, Bechyne Castle, Czechoslovakia, September 4-9, vol. II.
38. Rautian, T. G., Khalturin, V. I., Martynov, V. G., and Molnar, P., 1978, Preliminary analysis of the spectral content of P and S waves from local earthquakes in the Garm, Tadjikistan region, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 68, 949-971.
39. Rymer, M. J., and Ellsworth, W. L. (editors), 1990. The Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983. U.S. Geol. Survey Profess. Paper, 1487, Washigton.
40. Shebalin, N. V., 1991, Estimation of the size and position of the Spitak earthquake focus by macroseismic data, Complex estimation of seismic hazard (Engineering Seismology problems, iss. 32), Nauka Publishing House, Moscow, 36-44, (in Russian)
41. Sokolov, V. Yu., 1997, Empirical models for estimating Fourier-amplitude spectra of ground acceleration in the northern Caucasus (Racha seismogenic zone), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 1401-1412.
42. Stover, C. W., 1983, Intensity distribution and isoseismal map. Coalinga, California, earthquake of May 2, 1983: reconnaissance report. Scholl, R. E., and Stratta, J. L. (editors). EERI Report 84-03, 182-188.
43. Stover, C. W., and Coffman, J. A., 1993, Seismicity of the United States 1568-1989 (revised), U.S. Geol. Survey Profes. Paper 1527, Washington.
44. Toshinava, T., Taber J. J., and Berill, J. B., 1997, Distribution of ground-motion intensity inferred from questionnaire survey, earthquake recordings, and microtremor measurements - a case study in Christchurch, New Zealand, during the 1994 Arthurs Pass earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 87, 356-369.
45. Trifunac, M. D., 1976, Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of Modified Mercally Intensity and recording site conditions, Int. J. Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, 7, 63-74.
46. Trifunac, M. D., 1976a, A note on the range of peak amplitudes of recorded acceleration, velocities and displacements with respect to the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale, Earthquake Notes, 47(1), 9-24.
47. Trifunac, M. D., 1977, An instrumental comparison of the Modified Mercalli (MMI) and MedvedevKarnik-Sponheuer (MKS) intensity scales, Proc. 6-th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., New Dehli, India, 2-359.
48. Trifunac, M. D., 1989, Scaling strong motion Fourier spectra by Modified Mercalli Intensity, local soil and local geological site conditions, Structural Eng./Earthquake Eng., 6, 387-394.
49. Trifunac, M.D., and Brady, A.G. 1975, On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 65, p. 139-162.
50. Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W., 1985, Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong motion acceleration in terms of Modified Mercally Intensity and geological site conditions, Dept. of Civil Eng., Report No CE 85-04, Univ. Southern Calif., Los Angeles, California.
51. Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W., 1989, Empirical models for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source to station distance, site intensity and recording site conditions, Int. J. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Eng., 8, 110-125.
52. Wetmiller, R. J., Horner, R. B., Hasegawa, H. S., North, R. G., Lamontage, M., Weichert, D. N., and Evans, S. G., 1988, An analysis of the Nahanni Earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 78, 590-616.
53. Wyllie, L. A., and Filson J. R. (Editors), 1989, Special supplement Armenia Earthquake reconnaissance report, Earthquake Spectra.