Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis

Dermatitis

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 22-26

  Wenk, Kurt S ^a   Ehrlich, Alison ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; FRAGRANCE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; DERMATITIS; EYELID; EYELID DISEASE; FEMALE; FRAGRANCE SERIES TESTING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN TEST;

ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; EYELID DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 84864977164     PISSN: 17103568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d180f     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Amin KA, Belsito DV. The aetiology of eyelid dermatitis: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:280-285.
2. Valsecchi R, Imberti G, Martino D, et al. Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 150 patients. Contact Dermatitis 1992;27:143-147.
3. Ayala F, Fabbrocini G, Bacchilega R, et al. Eyelid dermatitis: an evaluation of 447 patients. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14:69-74.
4. Guin JD. Eyelid dermatitis: experience in 203 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:755-765.
5. Guin JD. Eyelid dermatitis: a report of 215 patients. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:87-90.
6. Peralejo B, Beltrani V, Bielory L. Dermatologic and allergic conditions of the eyelid. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2008;28:137-168.
7. Cuesta L, Silvestre JF, Toledo F, et al. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study. Contact Dermatitis 2010:63;77-84.
8. Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JF Jr, et al. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006. Dermatitis 2009;20(3): 149-160.
9. Goossens A. Contact allergic reactions on the eyes and eyelids. Bull Soc Belge Opthalmol 2004;292:11-17.
10. Marks JG Jr, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed-type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:911-918.
11. Frosch PJ, Pirker C, Rastogi SC, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:207-215.
12. Rietschel RL, Warshaw EM, Sasseville D, et al. Common contact allergens associated with eyelid dermatitis: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis 2007;18:78-81.
13. Katsarma G, Gawkrodger DJ. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41:193-197.
14. De Groot AC, Frosch J. Adverse reactions to fragrances: a clinical review. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36:57-86.
15. Johansen JD, Menne T. The fragrance mix and its constituents: a 14-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:18-23.
16. Malanin G, Ohela K. Allergic reactions to fragrance mix and its components. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21:62-63.
17. Frosch PJ, Rastogi SC, Pirker C, et al. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:216-225.
18. Enders F, Przybilla B, Ring J. Patch-testing with fragrance-mix and its constituents: discrepancies are largely due to the presence or absence of sorbitan sesquioleate. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:238-239.
19. Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Burrows D, et al. Testing with fragrance mix - is the addition of sorbitan sesquioleate to the constituents useful? Contact Dermatitis 1995;32:266-272.
20. Johansen JD, Skov L, Volund A, et al. Allergens in combination have a synergistic effect on the elicitation response: a study of fragrance-sensitized individuals. Br J Dermatol 1998;139:264-270.
21. De Groot AC, Van der Klev AMJ, Bruynzeel DP, et al. Frequency of falsenegative reactions to the fragrance mix. Contact Dermatitis 1993;28: 139-140.