Molecular imaging in breast cancer: From whole-body PET/CT to dedicated breast PET

Journal of Oncology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Koolen, B B ^a   Vogel, W V ^a   Vrancken Peeters, M J T F D ^a   Loo, C E ^a   Rutgers, E J Th ^a   Valdes Olmos R A ^a  

^a ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

AXILLARY LYMPH NODE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; HUMAN; LIMIT OF DETECTION; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY TUMOR; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WHOLE BODY PET;

EID: 84864945402     PISSN: 16878450     EISSN: 16878469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2012/438647     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Siegel R., Naishadham D., Jemal A., Cancer statistics A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2012 62 10 29
2. DeSantis C., Siegel R., Bandi P., Jemal A., Breast cancer statistics A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2011 61 409 418
3. Berry D. A., Cronin K. A., Plevritis S. K., Fryback D. G., Clarke L., Zelen M., Mandelblatt J. S., Yakovlev A. Y., Habbema J. D. F., Feuer E. J., Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer The New England Journal of Medicine 2005 353 17 1784 1792 (Pubitemid 41549890)
4. van der Hoeven J. J. M., Krak N. C., Hoekstra O. S., Comans E. F. I., Boom R. P. A., Van Geldere D., Meijer S., Van Der Wall E., Buter J., Pinedo H. M., Teule G. J. J., Lammertsma A. A., 18 F positron emission tomography in staging of locally advanced breast cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004 22 7 1253 1259 (Pubitemid 41079839)
5. Fuster D., Duch J., Paredes P., Velasco M., Muoz M., Santamara G., Fontanillas M., Pons F., Preoperative staging of large primary breast cancer with [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with conventional imaging procedures Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008 26 29 4746 4751
6. Aukema T. S., Straver M. E., Peeters M. J. T. F. D. V., Russell N. S., Gilhuijs K. G. A., Vogel W. V., Rutgers E. J. T., Olmos R. A. V., Detection of extra-axillary lymph node involvement with FDG PET/CT in patients with stage II-III breast cancer European Journal of Cancer 2010 46 18 3205 3210
7. Aukema T. S., Rutgers E. J. T., Vogel W. V., Teertstra H. J., Oldenburg H. S., Vrancken Peeters M. T. F. D., Wesseling J., Russell N. S., Valdés Olmos R. A., The role of FDG PET/CT in patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence: a comparison to conventional imaging techniques European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010 36 4 387 392
8. Peare R., Staff R. T., Heys S. D., The use of FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2010 123 1 281 290
9. Koolen B. B., Peeters M. J. T. F. D., Aukema T. S., Vogel W. V., Oldenburg H. S. A., van der Hage J. A., 18 F PET/CT as a staging procedure in primary stage II and III breast cancer: comparison with conventional imaging techniques Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2012 131 117 126
10. Gil-Rendo A., Martnez-Regueira F., Zornoza G., Garca-Velloso M. J., Beorlegui C., Rodriguez-Spiteri N., Association between [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognostic parameters in breast cancer British Journal of Surgery 2009 96 2 166 170
11. Groheux D., Giacchetti S., Moretti J. L., Porcher R., Espié M., Lehmann-Che J., De Roquancourt A., Hamy A. S., Cuvier C., Vercellino L., Hindié E., Correlation of high 18 F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2011 38 3 426 435
12. Wang Y., Zhang C., Liu J., Huang G., Is 18 F-FDG PET accurate to predict neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer? A meta-analysis Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2012 131 2 357 369
13. Avril N., Rose C. A., Schelling M., Dose J., Kuhn W., Bense S., Weber W., Ziegler S., Graeff H., Schwaiger M., Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations Journal of Clinical Oncology 2000 18 20 3495 3502
14. ermik T. F., Mavi A., Basu S., Alavi A., Impact of FDG PET on the preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2008 35 3 475 483 (Pubitemid 351661670)
15. Garami Z., Hascsi Z., Varga J., Dinya T., Tanyi M., Garai I., Damjanovich L., Galuska L., The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2012 38 1 31 37
16. Vidal-Sicart S., Aukema T. S., Vogel W. V., Hoefnagel C. A., Valdés-Olmos R. A., Added value of prone position technique for PET-TAC in breast cancer patients Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear 2010 29 5 230 235
17. Fletcher J. W., Djulbegovic B., Soares H. P., Siegel B. A., Lowe V. J., Lyman G. H., Coleman R. E., Wahl R., Paschold J. C., Avril N., Einhorn L. H., Suh W. W., Samson D., Delbeke D., Gorman M., Shields A. F., Recommendations on the use of 18 F-FDG PET in oncology Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2008 49 3 480 508 (Pubitemid 351355215)
18. Hodgson N. C., Gulenchyn K. Y., Is there a role for positron emission tomography in breast cancer staging? Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008 26 5 712 720 (Pubitemid 351264383)
19. Kolb T. M., Lichy J., Newhouse J. H., Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 2002 225 1 165 175
20. Berg W. A., Gutierrez L., NessAiver M. S., Carter W. B., Bhargavan M., Lewis R. S., Ioffe O. B., Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 2004 233 3 830 849
21. van Ufford H. M. E., van Tinteren H., Stroobants S. G., Riphagen I. I., Hoekstra O. S., Added value of baseline 18 F-FDG uptake in serial 18 F-FDG PET for evaluation of response of solid extracerebral tumors to systemic cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment: a meta-analysis Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2010 51 10 1507 1516
22. Vriens D., Disselhorst J. A., Oyen W. J. G., de Geus-Oei L.-F., Visser E. P., Quantitative assessment of heterogeneity in tumor metabolism using FDG-PET International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 2012 82 5 e725 e731
23. Yap T. A., Gerlinger M., Futreal P. A., Pusztai L., Swanton C., Intratumor heterogeneity: seeing the wood for the trees Science Translational Medicine 2012 4 127
24. Gerlinger M., Rowan A. J., Horswell S., Larkin J., Endesfelder D., Gronroos E., Martinez P., Matthews N., Stewart A., Tarpey P., Varela I., Phillimore B., Begum S., McDonald N. Q., Butler A., Jones D., Raine K., Latimer C., Santos C. R., Nohadani M., Eklund A. C., Spencer-Dene B., Clark G., Pickering L., Stamp G., Gore M., Szallasi Z., Downward J., Futreal P. A., Swanton C., Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing The New England Journal of Medicine 2012 366 10 883 892
25. Thompson C. J., Murthy K., Weinberg I. N., Mako F., Feasibility study for positron emission mammography Medical Physics 1994 21 4 529 538 (Pubitemid 24129931)
26. Murthy K., Aznar M., Thompson C. J., Loutfi A., Lisbona R., Gagnon J. H., Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2000 41 11 1851 1858
27. Levine E. A., Freimanis R. I., Perrier N. D., Morton K., Lesko N. M., Bergman S., Geisinger K. R., Williams R. C., Sharpe C., Zavarzin V., Weinberg I. N., Stepanov P. Y., Beylin D., Lauckner K., Doss M., Lovelace J., Adler L. P., Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results Annals of Surgical Oncology 2003 10 1 86 91
28. MacDonald L., Edwards J., Lewellen T., Haseley D., Rogers J., Kinahan P., Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009 50 10 1666 1675
29. Berg W. A., Madsen K. S., Schilling K., Tartar M., Pisano E. D., Larsen L. H., Narayanan D., Ozonoff A., Miller J. P., Kalinyak J. E., Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast Radiology 2011 258 1 59 72
30. Schilling K., Narayanan D., Kalinyak J. E., The J., Velasquez M. V., Kahn S., Saady M., Mahal R., Chrystal L., Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2011 38 1 23 36
31. Wang C. L., MacDonald L. R., Rogers J. V., Aravkin A., Haseley D. R., Beatty J. D., Positron emission mammography: correlation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and 18 F-FDG American Journal of Roentgenology 2011 197 2 W247 W255
32. Berg W. A., Madsen K. S., Schilling K., Tartar M., Pisano E. D., Larsen L. H., Narayanan D., Kalinyak J. E., Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer American Journal of Roentgenology 2012 198 1 219 232
33. Eo J. S., Chun I. K., Paeng J. C., Kang K. W., Lee S. M., Han W., Noh D.-Y., Chung J.-K., Lee D. S., Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size Breast 2012 21 1 66 71
34. Kalinyak J. E., Schilling K., Berg W. A., Narayanan D., Mayberry J. P., Rai R., DuPree E. B., Shusterman D. K., Gittleman M. A., Luo W., Matthews C. G., PET-guided breast biopsy The Breast Journal 2011 17 2 143 151
35. Rosen E. L., Turkington T. G., Soo M. S., Baker J. A., Coleman R. E., Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience Radiology 2005 234 2 527 534 (Pubitemid 40139925)
36. Berg W. A., Weinberg I. N., Narayanan D., Lobrano M. E., Ross E., Amodei L., Tafra L., Adler L. P., Uddo J., Stein W., Levine E. A., High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (positron emission mammography) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer The Breast Journal 2006 12 4 309 323 (Pubitemid 43989975)
37. Hendrick R. E., Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies Radiology 2010 257 1 246 253
38. O'Connor M. K., Li H., Rhodes D. J., Hruska C. B., Clancy C. B., Vetter R. J., Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast Medical Physics 2010 37 12 6187 6198
39. Raylman R. R., Majewski S., Smith M. F., Proffitt J., Hammond W., Srinivasan A., McKisson J., Popov V., Weisenberger A., Judy C. O., Kross B., Ramasubramanian S., Banta L. E., Kinahan P. E., Champley K., The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements Physics in Medicine and Biology 2008 53 3 637 653 (Pubitemid 351496210)
40. Raylman R. R., Abraham J., Hazard H., Koren C., Filburn S., Schreiman J. S., Kurian S., Majewski S., Marano G. D., Initial clinical test of a breast-PET scanner Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 2011 55 1 58 64
41. Wu Y., Bowen S. L., Yang K., Packard N., Fu L., Burkett G., Qi J., Boone J. M., Cherry S. R., Badawi R. D., PET characteristics of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner prototype Physics in Medicine and Biology 2009 54 13 4273 4287
42. Bowen S. L., Wu Y., Chaudhari A. J., Fu L., Packard N. J., Burkett G. W., Yang K., Lindfors K. K., Shelton D. K., Hagge R., Borowsky A. D., Martinez S. R., Qi J., Boone J. M., Cherry S. R., Badawi R. D., Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009 50 9 1401 1408
43. Soriano A., Gonzlez A., Orero A., Moliner L., Carles M., Snchez F., Benlloch J. M., Correcher C., Carrilero V., Seimetz M., Attenuation correction without transmission scan for the MAMMI breast PET Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 2011 648 supplement 1 S75 S78
44. Koolen B. B., Aukema T. S., Martnez A. J. G., Vogel W. V., Ontanaya L. C., Peeters M. J. T., First clinical experience with a dedicated PET for hanging breast molecular imaging. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. In press