Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast

Medical Physics

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6187-6198

  O'Connor, Michael K ^a   Li, Hua ^a   Rhodes, Deborah J ^a   Hruska, Carrie B ^a   Clancy, Conor B ^b   Vetter, Richard J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b ST JAMES S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

BSGI; mammography; MBI; PEM; radiation risk

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; IONIZING RADIATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

BSGI; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MOLECULAR BREAST IMAGING; NATURAL BACKGROUNDS; POSITRON EMISSION MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION RISK; RADIATION-INDUCED CANCER; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHIES;

RADIOTHERAPY;

EID: 78650151327     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.3512759     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. R. Smith-Bindman, " Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated attributable risk of cancer.," Arch. Intern Med. AIMDAP 0003-9926 169, 2078-2086 (2009). 10.1001/archinternmed. 2009.427
2. C. H. Lee, " Breast cancer screening with imaging: Recommendations from the society of breast imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.," J. Am. Coll. Radiol. ZZZZZZ 1546-1440 7, 18-27 (2010). 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022
3. P. A. Carney, " Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.," Ann. Intern Med. ZZZZZZ 0003-4819 138, 168-175 (2003).
4. D. S. M. Buist, " Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years.," J. Natl. Cancer Inst. JNCIEQ 0027-8874 96, 1432-1440 (2004). 10.1093/jnci/djh269 (Pubitemid 39429667)
5. C. K. Kuhl, " Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.," J. Clin. Oncol. JCONDN 0732-183X 23, 8469-8476 (2005). 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.4960
6. N. Calonge, D. B. Petitti, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, " Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.," Ann. Intern Med. ZZZZZZ 0003-4819 151, 716-726 (2009).
7. J. G. Elmore, K. Amstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher, " Screening for breast cancer.," JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. JAMAAP 0098-7484 293, 1245-1256 (2005). 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245 (Pubitemid 40327910)
8. W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, J. B. Cormack, and ACRIN 6666 Investigators, " Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.," JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. JAMAAP 0098-7484 299, 2151-2163 (2008). 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 (Pubitemid 351679706)
9. W. A. Berg, J. D. Blume, and A. M. Adams, " Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666.," Radiology RADLAX 0033-8419 254, 79-87 (2010). 10.1148/radiol. 2541090953
10. W. A. Berg, " High resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (positron emission mammography') is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer.," Breast J. BRJOFK 1075-122X 12, 309-323 (2006). 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00269.x (Pubitemid 43989975)
11. R. F. Brem, " Occult breast cancer: Scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer.," Radiology RADLAX 0033-8419 237, 274-280 (2005). 10.1148/radiol.2371040758 (Pubitemid 41346174)
12. M. K. O'Connor, D. Rhodes, and C. Hruska, " Molecular breast imaging.," Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 9, 1073-1080 (2009). 10.1586/era.09.75 1473-7140
13. D. J. Rhodes, C. B. Hruska, S. W. Phillips, D. H. Whaley, and M. K. O'Connor, " Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.," Radiology RADLAX 0033-8419 (in press).
14. National Research Council, BEIR VII: Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2006).
15. International Commission on Radiation Protection, ICRP Publication 99: Low-Dose Extrapolation of Radiation Related Cancer Risk (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006).
16. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes (United Nations, New York, 2006).
17. J. Law and K. Faulkner, " Cancers detected and induced, and associated risk and benefit, in a breast screening program.," Br. J. Radiol. BJRAAP 0007-1285 74, 1121-1127 (2001).
18. D. L. Preston, A. Mattsson, E. Holmberg, R. E. Shore, N. G. Hildreth, and J. D. Boice, " Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: A pooled analysis of eight cohorts.," Radiat. Res. RAREAE 0033-7587 158, 220-235 (2002). 10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0220:REOBCR]2.0.CO;2
19. J. Law, K. Faulkner, and K. C. Young, " Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by x-rays and their implications for breast screening.," Br. J. Radiol. BJRAAP 0007-1285 80, 261-266 (2007). 10.1259/bjr/20496795 (Pubitemid 47022817)
20. M. Vaeth and D. A. Pierce, " Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models.," Environ. Health Perspect. EVHPAZ 0091-6765 87, 83-94 (1990). 10.2307/3431010
21. National Program of Cancer Registries, United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2006 Cancer Incidence and Mortality Data. See http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/ uscs/.
22. Human Mortality Database, University of California, Berkeley, USA and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Germany. Available at www.mortality.org or www.humanmortality.de.
23. R. E. Hendrick, " Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology imaging network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.," AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. AAJRDX 0361-803X 194, 362-369 (2010). 10.2214/AJR.08.2114
24. D. J. Valentin, " Recalculated dose data for 19 frequently used radiopharmaceuticals from ICRP Publication 53.," Ann. ICRP ZZZZZZ 0146-6453 28, 47-83 (1998). 10.1016/S0146-6453(99)00009-3 (Pubitemid 129710673)
25. M. T. Hays, E. E. Watson, S. R. Thomas, and M. Stabin, " MIRD Dose Estimate Report No. 19: Radiation absorbed dose estimates from (18)F-FDG.," J. Nucl. Med. JNMEAQ 0161-5505 43, 210-214 (2002).
26. M. K. O'Connor, C. B. Hruska, A. L. Weinmann, A. Manduca, and D. J. Rhodes, " Development of radiation dose reduction techniques for cadmium zinc telluride detectors in molecular breast imaging.," Proc. SPIE PSISDG 0277-786X (in press).
27. NCRP, " Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.," NCRP Report No. 160 (Bethesda, MD, 2009).
28. J. W. Miller, J. B. King, A. B. Ryerson, C. R. Eheman, and M. C. White, " Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: State-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates.," AJR, Am. J. Roentgenol. AAJRDX 0361-803X 192, 352-360 (2009). 10.2214/AJR.08.1757
29. D. Schopper and C. de Wolf, " How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence.," Eur. J. Cancer EJCAEL 0959-8049 45, 1916-1923 (2009). 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.03.022
30. H. D. Nelson, K. Tyne, A. Nalk, K. Bougatsos, B. K. Chan, and L. Humphrey, " Screening for breast cancer: An update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.," Ann. Intern Med. ZZZZZZ 0003-4819 151, 727-737 (2009).
31. C. M. Vachon, " Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.," Breast Cancer Res. 9, 217-226 (2007). 10.1186/bcr1829 1465-5411
32. S. L. Bailey, B. M. Sigal, and S. K. Plevritis, " A simulation model investigating the impact of tumor volume doubling time and mammographic tumor detectability on screening outcomes in women aged 40-49 years.," J. Natl. Cancer Inst. JNCIEQ 0027-8874 102, 1263-1271 (2010). 10.1093/jnci/djq271
33. R. F. Redberg, " Cancer risks and radiation exposure from computed tomographic scans. How can we be sure that the benefits outweigh the risks?," Arch. Intern Med. AIMDAP 0003-9926 169, 2049-2050 (2009). 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.453
34. D. J. Brenner, " Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know.," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 100, 13761-13766 (2003). 10.1073/pnas.2235592100 (Pubitemid 37499140)
35. N. Hunter and C. R. Muirhead, " Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.," J. Radiol. Prot. JRPREA 0952-4746 29, 5-21 (2009). 10.1088/0952-4746/29/1/R01
36. D. J. Brenner, " Routine screening mammography: How important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation?," Int. J. Radiat. Biol. IJRBE7 0955-3022 78, 1065-1067 (2002). 10.1080/0955300021000016576 (Pubitemid 35462136)
37. J. Law, K. Faulkner, and K. C. Young, " RBE for mammographic x-ray energies.," Br. J. Radiol. BJRAAP 0007-1285 79, 851-852 (2006). 10.1259/bjr/55332466 (Pubitemid 44613689)
38. C. B. Hruska, S. W. Phillips, D. J. Rhodes, and M. K. O'Connor, " Concordance of molecular breast imaging and breast MRI findings: A retrospective review.," Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging EJNMA6 1619-7070 35, S199-S200 (2008). 10.1007/s00259-008-0906-y
39. R. F. Brem, I. Petrovitch, J. A. Rapelyea, H. Young, C. Teal, and T. Kelly, " Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer-A comparative study.," Breast J. BRJOFK 1075-122X 13, 465-469 (2007). 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00466.x (Pubitemid 47329333)
40. S. Y. Chiu, S. Duffy, A. M. Yen, L. Tabar, R. A. Smith, and H. H. Chen, " Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening.," Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. ZZZZZZ 1055-9965 19, 1219-1228 (2010). 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1028