Initial clinical test of a breast-PET scanner

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 58-64

  Raylman, Raymond R ^a   Abraham, Jame ^b   Hazard, Hannah ^c   Koren, Courtney ^a   Filburn, Shannon ^d   Schreiman, Judith S ^a   Kurian, Sobha ^b   Majewski, Stan ^a   Marano, Gary D ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine Hematology Oncology   (Australia)

^c Surgical Oncology   (Australia)

^d WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; clinical test; dedicated imaging; FDG; PET

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DETECTOR;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PILOT PROJECTS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79952594267     PISSN: 17549477     EISSN: 17549485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02230.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the society of breast imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7: 18-27.
2. Peters NHGM, Rinkes IHMB, Zuithoff NPA, Mali WPTM, Moons KGM, Peeters PHM,. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008; 265: 116-24. (Pubitemid 350305034)
3. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH,. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 124912-54.
4. Hruska CB, O'Connor MK, Collins DA,. Comparison of small field of view gamma camera systems for scintimammography. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26: 441-5. (Pubitemid 40617733)
5. Brem RF, Petrovitch I, Rapelyea JA, Young H, Teal C, Kelly T,. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer-a comparative study. Breast J 2007; 13: 465-9. (Pubitemid 47329333)
6. Isasi CR, Moadel RM, Blaufox MD,. A meta-analysis of FDG-PET for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 90: 105-12. (Pubitemid 40568893)
7. Smith IC, Gilbert FJ,. Role of positron emission tomography in the management of breast cancer. Breast 1999; 8: 303-10.
8. 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 480-508. (Pubitemid 351355215)
9. Thompson CJ, Murthy K, Weinberg IN, Mako F,. Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. Med Phys 1994; 21: 529-38. (Pubitemid 24129931)
10. Brambilla M, Secco C, Dominietto M, Matheoud R, Sacchetti G, Inglese E,. Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 2083-91. (Pubitemid 46657457)
11. Weinberg IN, Beylin D, Zavarzin V, et al. Technol Positron emission mammography: high-resolution biochemical breast imaging. Cancer Res Treat 2005; 4: 55-60. (Pubitemid 40189670)
12. Wu Y, Yang K, Packard N, et al. Characteristics of the PET component of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner prototype. 2006 IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2007; 4: 2335-9. (Pubitemid 351164749)
13. Wang G-C, Huber JS, Moses WW, Qi J, Choong W-S,. Characterization of the LBNL PEM camera. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006; 53: 1129-35. (Pubitemid 44109405)
14. Abreu MC, Almeida P, Balau F, et al. CLEAR-PEM: a dedicated PET camera for improved breast cancer detection. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 116: 208-10. (Pubitemid 43153902)
15. Rosen EL, Turkington TG, Soo MS, Baker JA, Coleman RE,. Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 234: 527-34. (Pubitemid 40139925)
16. Raylman RR, Majewski S, Smith MF, et al. The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction, and phantom-based measurements. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 637-53. (Pubitemid 351496210)
17. Budinger TF, Derenzo SE, Gullberg GT, Greenberg WL, Huesman RH,. Emission computer assisted tomography with single-photon and positron annihilation photon emitters. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977; 1: 131-45. (Pubitemid 8059390)
18. Smith MF, Raylman RR,. PEM-PET image reconstruction in a clinically-relevant time frame. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec 2007; 5: 1792-6. (Pubitemid 351164489)
19. Raylman RR,. Positron emission tomography-guided biopsy with a dedicated breast scanner: initial evaluation. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2009; 56: 620-4.
20. Raylman RR, Smith MF, Kinahan PE, Majewski S,. Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system. Med Phys 2008; 35: 4989-97.