Extreme short-term environmental constraints do not update internal models of action as assessed from motor imagery in adults

Neuroscience

Volumn 222, Issue , 2012, Pages 69-74

  Chabeauti, P Y ^a   Assaiante, C ^a   Vaugoyeau, M ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Internal models; Microgravity; Motor imagery

Indexed keywords

SCOPOLAMINE;

ACTUAL MOVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BACK TO SIT TASK; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; IMAGINATION; IMAGINED MOVEMENT; MALE; MICROGRAVITY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR IMAGERY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SIT TO STAND TASK;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANTIEMETICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SCOPOLAMINE HYDROBROMIDE; WEIGHTLESSNESS;

EID: 84864943240     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Berthoz A. Parietal and hippocampal contribution to topokinetic and topographic memory. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 1997, 352:1437-1448.
2. Casellato C., Tagliabue M., Pedrocchi A., Papaxanthis C., Ferrigno G., Pozzo T. Reaching while standing in microgravity: a new postural solution to oversimplify movement control. Exp Brain Res 2012, 216(2):203-215.
3. Cheung B.S., Howard I.P., Money K.E. Visually-induced tilt during parabolic flights. Exp Brain Res 1990, 81:391-397.
4. Clement G., Lestienne F. Adaptive modifications of postural attitude in conditions of weightlessness. Exp Brain Res 1988, 72:381-389.
5. Collet C., Guillot A., Lebon F., MacIntyre T., Moran A. Measuring motor imagery using psychometric, behavioral, and psychophysiological tools. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2011, 39:85-92.
6. Courtine G., Papaxanthis C., Gentili R., Pozzo T. Gait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004, 22:67-75.
7. Decety J. Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1996, 3:87-93.
8. Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behav Brain Res 1995, 72:127-134.
9. Demougeot L., Papaxanthis C. Muscle fatigue affects mental simulation of action. J Neurosci 2011, 31:10712-10720.
10. Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4:423-431.
11. Fadiga L., Craighero L. Electrophysiology of action representation. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 21:157-169.
12. Fitts P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1954, 47:381-391.
13. Gentili R., Cahouet V., Ballay Y., Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 2004, 155:231-239.
14. Grabherr L., Cuffel C., Guyot J.P., Mast F.W. Mental transformation abilities in patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 2011, 209:205-214.
15. Grabherr L., Karmali F., Bach S., Indermaur K., Metzler S., Mast F.W. Mental own-body and body-part transformations in microgravity. J Vestib Res 2007, 17:279-287.
16. Grabherr L., Mast F.W. Effects of microgravity on cognition: the case of mental imagery. J Vestib Res 2010, 20:53-60.
17. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14:S103-S109.
18. Jeannerod M., Decety J. Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1995, 5:727-732.
19. Keeler J.D., Pichler E.E., Ross J. Noise in neural networks: thresholds, hysteresis, and neuromodulation of signal-to-noise. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989, 86:1712-1726.
20. Maruff P., Wilson P.H., De Fazio J., Cerritelli B., Hedt A., Currie J. Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:379-384.
21. Paillard J. Motor neglect - issues and prospects. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1990, 146:600-611.
22. Papaxanthis C., Dubost V., Pozzo T. Similar planning strategies for whole-body and arm movements performed in the sagittal plane. Neuroscience 2003, 117:779-783.
23. Papaxanthis C., Pozzo T., Kasprinski R., Berthoz A. Comparison of actual and imagined execution of whole-body movements after a long exposure to microgravity. Neurosci Lett 2003, 339:41-44.
24. Papaxanthis C., Pozzo T., Skoura X., Schieppati M. Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behav Brain Res 2002, 134:209-215.
25. Papaxanthis C., Schieppati M., Gentili R., Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 2002, 143:447-452.
26. Personnier P., Paizis C., Ballay Y., Papaxanthis C. Mentally represented motor actions in normal aging II. The influence of the gravito-inertial context on the duration of overt and covert arm movements. Behav Brain Res 2008, 186:273-283.
27. Roll J.P., Popov K., Gurfinkel V., Lipshits M., André-Deshays C., Gilhodes J.C., et al. Sensorimotor and perceptual function of muscle proprioception in microgravity. J Vestib Res 1993, 3:259-273.
28. Roll R., Gilhodes J.C., Roll J.P., Popov K., Charade O., Gurfinkel V. Proprioceptive information processing in weightlessness. Exp Brain Res 1998, 122:393-402.
29. Vaugoyeau M, Assaiante C (2007) Sit-to-stand and back-to-stand motion under microgravity condition. In: ISPGR 2007 (18th international conference). July 14-18th, 2007.
30. Vaugoyeau M., Assaiante C. Postural orientation in microgravity depends on straightening up movement performed. Acta Astronaut 2009, 65:347-353.
31. Viel S, Vaugoyeau M, Assaiante C (2010). Postural adaptation of the spatial reference frames to microgravity: back to the egocentric reference frame. Plos One. 20;5(4):e10259.
32. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr Biol 2001, 11:R729-R732.
33. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3(Suppl.):1212-1217.
34. Wolpert D.M., Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw 1998, 11:1317-1329.
35. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C., Kawato M. Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends Cogn Sci 1998, 2:338-347.
36. Young L.R., Shelhamer M., Modestino S. M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 2. Visual vestibular tilt interaction in weightlessness. Exp Brain Res 1986, 64:299-307.
37. Zacks J.M. Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: a meta-analysis and review. J Cognit Neurosci 2008, 20:1-19.