Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-Gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1016, 2012, Pages

  Suh, Y J ^a   Kim, Min Jung ^a   Kim, E K ^a   Moon, H J ^a   Kwak, J Y ^a   Koo, H R ^a   Yoon, J H ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VACUUM;

EID: 84864839675     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/30974918     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502. (Pubitemid 32121065)
2. Won B, Reynolds HE, Lazaridis CL, Jackson VP. Stereotactic biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted device: persistent underestimation of disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:227-9. (Pubitemid 29291121)
3. Darling M, Smith D, Lester S, Kaelin C, Selland D, Denison C, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1341-6.
4. Jackman R, Nowels K, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FJ, Finkelstein S, Shepard M. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805. (Pubitemid 29124044)
5. Londero V, Zuiani C, Furlan A, Nori J, Bazzocchi M. Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Radio Med 2007;112:863-76. (Pubitemid 350155013)
6. Moon W, Im J-G, Noh D. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 2000;217:849-54.
7. Schoonjans J, Rache R. Sonographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with ultrasonographically guided large core needle biopsy: correlation with mammographic and pathologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2000;19:449-57.
8. Soo M, Baker J, Rosen E. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:941-8. (Pubitemid 36363029)
9. Yang W, Suen M, Ahuja A, Metreweli C. In vivo demonstration of microcalcification in breast cancer using high resolution ultrasound. Br J Radiol 1997;70:685-90. (Pubitemid 127747663)
10. Kim M, Kim EK, Lee JY, Youk JH, Park BW, Kim SI, et al. Breast lesions with imaging-histologic discordance during US-guided 14G automated core biopsy: can the directional vacuum-assisted removal replace the surgical excision? Initial findings. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2376-83. (Pubitemid 47288276)
11. Fajardo L, Pisano E, Caudry D, Gatsonis C, Berg W, Connolly J. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 2004;11:293-308. (Pubitemid 38269468)
12. Liberman L, Feng T, Dershaw D, Morris E, Abramson A. Ultrasound-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717-23. (Pubitemid 28405108)
13. Youk JH, Kim E-K, Kim MJK, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 2007;27:79-94.
14. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracywith directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;202:843-7. (Pubitemid 27093464)
15. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP 3rd, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;204:485-8. (Pubitemid 27337499)
16. Philpotts L, Lee C, Horvath L, Lange R, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1047-50.
17. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Lee SH, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 2005;6:102-9. (Pubitemid 40896873)
18. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:347-51. (Pubitemid 36135012)
19. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
20. Cassano E, Urban LABD, Pizzamiglio M, Abbate F, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;102:103-10. (Pubitemid 46294956)
21. Schueller G, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1761-73.
22. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, Denison CM, Rose DI, Lester S, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:43-9. (Pubitemid 32051820)
23. Youk JH, Kim E-K, Kim MJK, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:202-7.
24. Han B, Choe Y, Ko Y, Nam S, Kim J, Yang J. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up. Korean J Radiol 2003;4:217-23. (Pubitemid 38569462)
25. Schueller G, Jaromi S, Ponhold L, Fuchsjaeger M, Memarsadeghi M, Rudas M, et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 2008;248:406-13.
26. Pinder SE. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): pathological features, differential diagnosis, prognostic factors and specimen evaluation. Mod Pathol 2010;23:S8-13.
27. Kim MJ, Kim E-K, Kwak JY, Son EJ, Park B-W, Kim S-I, et al. Nonmalignant papillary lesions of the breast at US-guided directional vacuum-assisted removal: a preliminary report. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1774-83.
28. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris E, LaTrenta L, Abramson A, Zakowski M, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 2000;89:2538-46.
29. Liberman L, Smolkin J, Dershaw DD, Morris E, Abramson A, Rosen P. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1998;208:251-60.
30. Soo M, Baker J, Rosen E, Vo T. Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1007-15. (Pubitemid 34250248)
31. Parker S, Klanus A. Performing a breast biopsy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiographics 1997;17:1233-52. (Pubitemid 127465191)
32. Ikeda DM, Andersson I. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances. Radiology 1989;172:661-6. (Pubitemid 19211578)
33. Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology 1989;170:411-15. (Pubitemid 19035664)
34. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:967-72. (Pubitemid 32823221)
35. Crowe JP Jr, Patrick RJ, Rybicki LA, Grundfest SF, Kim JA, Lee KB, et al. Does ultrasound core breast biopsy predict histologic finding on excisional biopsy? Am J Surg 2003;186:397-9. (Pubitemid 38368618)
36. Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K, Helms G, Remme E, Koretz K, et al. Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 2005;92:231-5. (Pubitemid 40343134)
37. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33:47-52. (Pubitemid 40194410)