Energy demands for seismic design against low-cycle fatigue

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 383-404

  Teran Gilmore, Amador ^a   Jirsa, James O ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage index; Low cycle fatigue; Performance based design; Plastic energy; Target ductility

Indexed keywords

DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION;

DAMAGE INDEX; ENERGY DEMAND; LOW-CYCLE FATIGUE; STRENGTH REDUCTION FACTOR;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; FATIGUE; GROUND MOTION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRENGTH; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 33847752184     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.663     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Housner GW. Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes. Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1956; 5-1-5-13.
2. Zahrah TF, Hall WJ. Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1984; 110(8):1757-1772.
3. Kuwamura H, Galambos TV. Earthquake load for structural reliability. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1989; 115(6):1446-1463.
4. Akiyama H, Takahashi M. Response of reinforced concrete moment frames to strong earthquake ground motions. Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Elsevier Applied Science: 1992; 105-114.
5. Chou CC, Uang CM. Establishing absorbed energy spectra - an attenuation approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29:1441-1455.
6. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:837-848.
7. Bertero RD, Bertero VV. Tall reinforced concrete buildings: conceptual earthquake-resistant design methodology. Report No. UCB/EERC-92/16, University of California, 1992.
8. Teran-Gilmore A. Performance-based earthquake-resistant design of framed buildings using energy concepts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1996.
9. Decanini LD, Mollaloli F. An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2001; 21:113-137.
10. Teran-Gilmore A, Jirsa JO. A simple damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Spectra 2005; 21(3):803-832.
11. Somerville PG, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. Report SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, 1997.
12. Arroyo-Espinoza D, Teran-Gilmore A. Strength reduction factors for ductile structures with passive energy dissipating devices. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(2):297-325.
13. Hirao K, Sasada S, Nariyuki Y. The effect of duration and frequency content of earthquake motion on energy responses of SDOF structures. Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. V, 1988; 141-146.
14. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1975; 65(3):581-626.
15. Tajimi H. A statistical method for determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake. Proceedings of Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. II, 1960; 781-797.
16. Tung A, Wang JN, Kiremidjian AS, Kavazanjian E. Statistical parameters of AM and PSD functions for the generation of site-specific strong ground motions. Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 2, 1982; 867-872.
17. Villa-Velázquez CI, Ruiz-Gomez SE. Modulación de la intensidad y duración de movimientos sísmicos registrados en el Valle de México. Proceedings of the XIII Mexican Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. CD, 2001.
18. Arroyo-Espinoza D, Ordaz-Schroeder M. Estimación analítica de demandas inelásticas en sistemas de un grado de libertad. Proceedings of the IV Mexican Conference on Structural Engineering, vol. CD, 2004.
19. Manfredi G. Evaluation of seismic energy demand. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:485-499.
20. Whittaker A, Constantinou M, Tsopelas P. Displacement estimates for performance-based seismic design. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124(8):905-912.
21. Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Seismic design based on low cycle fatigue criteria. Proceedings of the XI World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. CD, 1996.
22. Arroyo-Espinoza D, Teran-Gilmore A. Use of strength reduction factors to account for low cycle fatigue. Proceedings of the Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. CD, 2002.
23. Riddell R, Garcia JE. Hysteretic energy spectrum and earthquake damage. Proceedings of the Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. CD, 2002.
24. Park YJ, Ang AH. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1985; 111(ST4):740-757.