Reliability-based evaluation of steel structures using energy concepts

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1745-1759

  Bojorquez, Eden ^a   Ruiz, Sonia E ^a   Teran Gilmore, Amador ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Normalized dissipated hysteretic energy spectra; Reliability based evaluation procedure; Transformation factors; Uniform annual failure rate

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); HYSTERESIS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

NORMALIZED DISSIPATED HYSTERETIC ENERGY SPECTRA; RELIABILITY-BASED EVALUATION PROCEDURE; TRANSFORMATION FACTORS; UNIFORM ANNUAL FAILURE RATE;

STEEL STRUCTURES;

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); HYSTERESIS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; RELIABILITY; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 43249114682     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Moehle JP. Displacement based design of reinforced concrete structures subjected to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 8 3 (1992) 403-428
2. Priestley MJN.. Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering-conflicts between design and reality. Publication. American Concrete Institute; 1993. SP-157. p. 231-54
3. {ring operator} World conference on earthquake engineering (CD). 2000
4. Fajfar P., and Krawinkler H. Conclusions and recommendations. Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes (1997), A.A. Balkema
5. Park Y., and Ang AH. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 111 ST4 (1985) 740-757
6. Williams M., and Sexsmith RG. Seismic assessment of concrete bridges using inelastic damage analysis. Engineering Structures 19 3 (1997) 208-216
7. Stephens J., and Yao JTP. Damage assessment using response measurements. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 113 4 (1987) 787-801
8. Silva-Olivera H, Lopez-Batiz O.. Estudio experimental sobre índices de daño en estructuras de concreto reforzado sujetas a cargas laterales. In: XIII Mexican conference on earthquake engineering. 2001 [in Spanish]. (CD)
9. Teran-Gilmore A.. Características mecánicas y desempeño sísmico de marcos dúctiles de concreto reforzado. In: XI Mexican conference on earthquake engineering. 1998 [in Spanish]. (CD)
10. Rodriguez M., and Aristizabal JC. Evaluation of a seismic damage parameter. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28 (1999) 463-477
11. Huerta-Garnica B., and Reinoso-Angulo E. Espectros de energía de movimientos fuertes registrados en México. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 66 (2002) 45-72 [in Spanish]
12. {ring operator} World conference on earthquake engineering (CD), paper 516, 2004
13. Arroyo D, Ordaz M.. Demandas de energía plástica disipada en sistemas de un grado de libertad ubicados en suelos blandos. In: XV Mexican conference on earthquake engineering. 2006 [in Spanish]. (CD), Paper V-02
14. Teran-Gilmore A., and Jirsa J. A damage model for practical seismic design that accounts for low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Spectra 21 (2005) 803-832
15. Seed HB, Sun JI.. Implications of site effects in the Mexico City Earthquake of Sept. 19, 1985 for earthquake-resistant design criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Report no.UCB/EERC-89/03. University of California at Berkeley; 1989
16. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21 (1992) 837-848
17. Cosenza E, Manfredi G.. Seismic design based on low cycle fatigue criteria. In: XI World conference on earthquake engineering (CD), paper 1141. 1996
18. Bertero VV.. Performance-based seismic engineering: A critical review of proposed guidelines. In: Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes 1997. Bled, Slovenia, p. 1-31
19. Teran-Gilmore A., and Jirsa J. Energy demands for seismic design against low cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36 3 (2007) 383-404
20. Krawinkler H., and Nassar A. Seismic design based on ductility and cumulative damage demands and capacities. In: Krawinkler H., and Fajfar P. (Eds). Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings (1992), Elsevier Applied Science, UK 95-104
21. Krawinkler H., and Zohrei M. Cumulative damage in steel structure subjected to earthquake ground motions. Computer and Structures 16 (1983) 531-541
22. Bozorgnia Y, Bertero V.. Improved shaking and damage parameters for post-earthquake applications. In: Proceedings of the SMIP01 seminar on utilization of strong-motion data. 2001
23. Housner GW.. Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes. In: First world conference on earthquake engineering. 1956
24. Akiyama H. Earthquake-resistant limit-state design for buildings (1985), University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo
25. Uang C., and Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 19 (1990) 77-90
26. Akbas B., Shen J., and Hao H. Energy Approach in performance-based design of steel moment resisting frames for basic safety objective. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 10 (2001) 193-217
27. Choi H., and Kim J. Energy-based seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames using hysteretic energy spectrum. Engineering Structures 28 (2006) 304-311
28. Inoue T, Cornell CA.. Seismic hazard analysis of MDOF structures, ICASP 6. Ciudad de México 1991;1;p.437-44
29. Esteva L, Ruiz S, Rivera J.. Reliability and performance-based seismic design of structures with energy-dissipating devices. In: 9th World seminar on seismic isolation, energy dissipation and active vibration control of structures. 2005
30. Wen YK. Building Reliability and Code Calibration. Earthquake Spectra 11 (1995) 269-296
31. Cornell CA.. Reliability-based earthquake-resistant design: the future. In: Proceedings, 11th World conference on earthquake engineering. Paper No. 2166
32. Collins KR, Wen YK, Foutch DA.. Investigation of alternative seismic design procedures for standard building. Rep. no. UILU-ENG-95-2003. Urbana-Champaign: Illinois University
33. Rivera J., and Ruiz SE. Design approach based on UAFR spectra for structures with displacement-dependent dissipating elements. Earthquake Spectra 23 (2007) 417-439
34. Gosain N., Brown R., and Jirsa JO. Shear requirements for load reversals on RC members. Journal of Structural Engineering 103 ST7 (1977) 1461-1476
35. Scribner C., and Wight JK. Strength decay in R/C beams under load reversals. Journal of Structural Division. Proc. ASCE 106 ST4 (1980) 861-876
36. Darwin D., and Nmai CK. Energy dissipation in RC beams under cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 112 8 (1985) 1829-1846
37. Akiyama H., and Takahashi M. Response of reinforced concrete moment frames to strong earthquake ground motions. In: Krawinkler H., and Fajfar P. (Eds). Nonlinear seismic analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings (1992), Elsevier Applied Science, UK 105-114
38. Chou C., and Uang CM. Establishing absorbed energy spectra-an attenuation approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 29 (2000) 1441-1455
39. Teran-Gilmore A, Simon R.. Use of constant cumulative ductility spectra for performance-based seismic design of ductile frames. In: 8th US national conference on earthquake engineering (CD), Paper 1781. 2006
40. Decanini L., and Mollaioli F. An energy-based methodology for the assessment of seismic demand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 21 (2001) 113-137
41. Bertero RD, Bertero VV. Tall reinforced concrete buildings: Conceptual earthquake-resistant design methodology. Report no.UCB/EERC-92/16. University of California
42. Somerville PG, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J.. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project. Report SAC/BD- 97/04, SAC Joint Venture
43. Bojorquez E, Diaz MA, Ruiz SE. Teran-Gilmore A. Correlation between local and global cyclic structural capacity of SMR frames. In: First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (CD). 2006
44. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. ASCE/FEMA 273 Prestandard
45. Shome N, Cornell CA.. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Reliability of marine structures program 1999. Report no. RMS-35. Dept. of Civil Eng., Stanford University
46. Shome N., Bazurro P., Cornell C., and Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records and nonlinear MDOF responses. Earthquake Spectra 14 (1998) 469-500
47. Iervolino I., and Cornell CA. Records selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthquake Spectra 21 3 (2005) 685-713
48. Baker J., and Cornell CA. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 34 (2004) 1193-1217
49. Montiel M., and Ruiz SE. Influence of structural capacity uncertainty on seismic reliability of buildings under narrow-band motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 36 (2007) 1915-1934
50. Bojorquez E., Diaz M., Ruiz S., and Garcia-Jarque F. Confiabilidad sísmica de varios edificios (cuatro a diez niveles) localizados en suelo blando de la ciudad de México, diseñados con el RCDF-2004. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 76 (2007) 1-27 [in Spanish]
51. Bojorquez E, Ruiz SE.. Factores de transformación de ductilidades, distorsiones máximas de entrepiso y de energía histerética normalizada entre S1GL y SMGL. In: Third national conference on earthquake engineering, CD [in Spanish]