" Everything is plentiful-Except attention" Attention data of scientific journals on social web tools

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 661-668

  Kortelainen, Terttu ^a   Katvala, Mari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attention; Facebook; Scientific publishing; Social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864808004     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams S.A. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of Web 2.0: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2010, 79(6):291-400.
2. Aharony N. Librarians and information scientists in the blogosphere: An exploratory analysis?. Library and Information Science Research 2009, 31(3):174-181.
3. Anderson, K. (2012, March 26). The problems with calling comments post-publication peer-review. The Scholarly Kitchen blog. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/.
4. Anderson P. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and ideas for education 2007, February, JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
5. Bar-Ilan J. Information hub blogs. Journal of Information Science 2005, 31(4):297-307. http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/31/4/297.
6. Borgman C. Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the internet 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Casati R., Origgi G., Simon J. Micro-credits in scientific publishing. Journal of Documentation 2011, 67(6):958-974.
8. Chua A.Y.K., Goh D.H. A study of Web 2.0 applications in library websites. Library and Information Science Research 2010, 32:203-211.
9. Clyde L.A. Weblogs and libraries 2004, Chandos Publishing, Oxford, UK.
10. Coyne P. Loosely joined: The discovery and consumption of scholarly content in the digital era. Envisioning future academic library services. Initiatives, ideas and challenges 2010, 104-118. Facet Publishing, London. S. McKnight (Ed.).
11. Cronin B., Shaw D. Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2002, 53(14):1267-1270.
12. Davenport T.H., Beck J.C. The attention economy 2001, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
13. Dolmaya J.M. A window into the profession: What translation blogs have to offer translation studies. Translator 2011, 17(1):77-104.
14. Eysenbach G. Can Tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of medical Internet Research 2011, 13(4):e123. http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/, 10.2196/jmir.2012.
15. Falkinger J. Limited attention as a scarce resource in information-rich economies. The Economic Journal 2008, October, 118:1596-1620.
16. Frank G. The scientific economy of attention: A novel approach to the collective rationality of science. Scientometrics 2002, 55(1):3-6.
17. Giustini D. How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. British Medical Journal 2006, 333:1283-1284.
18. Goldhaber M.H. The attention economy and the net. First Monday 1997, 2(4-7). http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/519/440.
19. Gray K., Thompson C., Clerehan R., Sheard J., Hamilton M. Web 2.0 authorship: Issues of referencing and citation for academic integrity. The Internet and Higher Education 2008, 11(2):112-118.
20. Halper S. Uses of Web 2.0 by UK social science researchers and libraries. ALISS Quarterly 2008, 3(3):3-10.
21. Haustein S., Siebenlist T. Applying social bookmarking data to evaluate journal usate. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5:446-457.
22. Krishnamurthy B., Gill P., Arlitt M. A few chirps about Twitter. ACM SIGCOMM workshop online social networks 2008, ACM. http://www2.research.att.com/bala/papers/twit.pdf.
23. Meyer, J. (2006, August 19). What is attention data? Using Attention blog. http://www.usingattention.com/.
24. Priem, J. & Hemminger, M. (2010) Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. Firstmonday 15(7 July) http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570.
25. Priem J., Taraborelli D., Groth P., Neylon C. Altmetrics: A manifesto 2011, http://altmetrics.org/manifesto.
26. Savolainen R. Requesting and providing information in blogs and internet discussion forums. Journal of Documentation 2011, 67(5):863-886.
27. Scott D.M. What we all really want: Attention. EContent 2009, 32(7):48. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer%3Fvid=5%26hid=15%26sid=19a55e15-eaf3-4c14-a446-5d5244dbaedd%40sessionmgr12.
28. Schroeder R., Power L., Meyer E.T. Putting scientometrics 2.0 in its place [vO]. Altmetrics11. Tracking scholarly impact on the social web. An ACM web science conference 2011 workshop 2011, http://altmetrics.org/workshop2011/schroeder-v0/.
29. Simon H.A. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, communications, and the public interest 1971, The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD. M. Greenberger (Ed.).
30. Skågeby J. Exploring qualitative sharing practices of social metadata: Expanding the attention economy. The Information Society 2009, 25:60-72.
31. Smith D. A parallel universe? Blogs, wikis, Web 2.0 and a complicated future for scholarly communication. Serials 2008, 21(1):14-18.
32. Sterling, B. (1992). Free as the air free as water free as knowledge. Speech to the Library and Information Technology Association. San Francisco, CA, June 1992. http://www.cscs.umich.edu/crshalizi/Sterling/Free_as_the_Air_Free_as_Water_Free_as_Knowledge.html.
33. Thelwall M. No place for news in social network web sites?. Online Information Review 2008, 32(6):726-744.
34. Thomson. Journal citation reports. http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/JCR%3FSID=W2NhPaMKfMd9pcDbdgJ.
35. Torres-Salinas D., Delgado-Lopez-Cozar E. Strategies to improve the dissemination of research results with the Web 2.0. Profesional de la Informacion 2009, 18(5):534-539.
36. Torres-Salinas D., Cabezas-Clavijo á., Ruiz-Pérez R., López-Cózar E.D. State of the library and information science blogosphere after social networks boom: A metric approach. Library and Information Science Research 2011, 33(2):168-174.
37. Tripathi M., Kumar S. Use of web 2. 0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape. The International Information & Library Review 2010, 42:195-207.
38. Wang X., Jiang T., Ma F. Blog-supported scientific communication: An exploratory analysis based on social hyperlinks in a Chinese blog community. Journal of Information Science 2010, 36:5.
39. Wassermann, T. (2011). Facebook launches new metric: " People talking about" Mashable Social Media. http://mashable.com/2011/10/02/facebook-people-talking-about/.
40. Yardi S., Golder S.A., Brzozowski M.J. Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy. CHI 2009, 2071-2080.
41. Yardi S., Golder S.A., Brzozowski M.J. Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy. CHI 2009 - Social software in office 2009, http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/blogging/chi2009/.